CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 638

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities

Dada, Adetunmise C., Leach, Jonathan, Buller, Gerald S., Padgett, Miles J., Andersson, Erika·2011·Nature Physics
DOI 10.1038/nphys1996
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nphys1996

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The demonstrated capability to efficiently generate and detect hybrid polarization−OAM quantum states with very large OAM creates interesting prospects for high-rate classical communication, coupling with atomic systems, quantum information processing and fundamental tests of quantum mechanics.

    “In addition to metrological applications, the capability we have demonstrated to efficiently generate and detect hybrid polarization−OAM quantum states with very large OAM creates interesting prospects for high-rate classical communication33, coupling with atomic systems34, quantum information processing35 and fundamental tests of quantum mechanics3637.”

    From Photonic polarization gears for ultra-sensitive angular measurements (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Durt, T., Kaszlikowski, D., Chen, J-L. & Kwek, L. C. Security of quantum key distributions with entangled qudits. Phys. Rev. A 69, 032313 (2004). · DOI
  2. Vértesi, T., Pironio, S. & Brunner, N. Closing the detection loophole in Bell experiments using qudits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 060401 (2010). · DOI
  3. Collins, D., Gisin, N-l., Linden, N., Massar, S. & Popescu, S. Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 040404 (2002). · DOI
  4. Walborn, S. P., de Oliveira, A. N., Thebaldi, R. S. & Monken, C. H. Entanglement and conservation of orbital angular momentum in spontaneous parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. A 69, 023811 (2004). · DOI
  5. You-Bang, Z., Qun-Yong, Z., Yu-Wu, W. & Peng-Cheng, M. Schemes for teleportation of an unknown single-qubit quantum state by using an arbitrary high-dimensional entangled state. Chinese Phys. Lett. 27, 10307–10310 (2010). · DOI
  6. Bennett, C. H. & Wiesner, S. J. Communication via one- and two-particle operators on Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2881–2884 (1992). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hillery, M., Bužek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829–1834 (1999). · DOI
  8. Yuan, Z-S. et al. Experimental demonstration of a BDCZ quantum repeater node. Nature 454, 1098–1101 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gao, W-B. et al. Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schrödinger cat state. Nature Phys. 6, 331–335 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  10. Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental two-photon, three-dimensional entanglement for quantum communication. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 240401 (2002). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental realization of Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm gedankenexperiment: A new violation of Bell’s inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91–94 (1982). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Leach, J. et al. Violation of a Bell inequality in two-dimensional orbital angular momentum state-spaces. Opt. Exp. 17, 8287–8293 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  13. Jack, B. et al. Entanglement of arbitrary superpositions of modes within two-dimensional orbital angular momentum state spaces. Phys. Rev. A 81, 043844 (2010). · DOI
  14. Jack, B. et al. Precise quantum tomography of photon pairs with entangled orbital angular momentum. New J. Phys. 11, 103024 (2009). · DOI
  15. Pors, J. B. et al. Shannon dimensionality of quantum channels and its application to photon entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 120502 (2008). · DOI
  16. Gröblacher, S., Jennewein, T., Vaziri, A., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Experimental quantum cryptography with qutrits. New J. Phys. 8, 75 (2006). · DOI
  17. Durt, T., Kaszlikowski, D. & Żukowski, M. Violations of local realism with quantum systems described by N-dimensional Hilbert spaces up to N=16. Phys. Rev. A 64, 024101 (2001). · DOI
  18. Bennett, C. H., Bernstein, H. J., Popescu, S. & Schumacher, B. Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations. Phys. Rev. A 53, 2046–2052 (1996). · DOI
  19. Leach, J., Dennis, M. R., Courtial, J. & Padgett, M. J. Vortex knots in light. New J. Phys. 7, 55 (2005). · DOI
  20. Torres, J. P., Alexandrescu, A. & Torner, L. Quantum spiral bandwidth of entangled two-photon states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 050301 (2003). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Law, C. K. & Eberly, J. H. Analysis and interpretation of high transverse entanglement in optical parametric down conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 127903 (2004). · DOI
  22. Vaziri, A., Pan, J-W., Jennewein, T., Weihs, G. & Zeilinger, A. Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: Qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 227902 (2003). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dada, A. C., Leach, J., Buller, G. S., Padgett, M. J., & Andersson, E.
Venue
Nature Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-05-08
Volume
7
Issue
9
Pages
677-680
ISSN
  • 1745-2473
  • 1745-2481
DOI
10.1038/nphys1996
Cited by
638
References
8
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review