The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Silicon-on-insulator integrated source of polarization-entangled photons
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Once generated and analyzed, OAM states can be manipulated with high degree of control to encode quantum information in the infinite OAM Hilbert space.
“Once generated and analyzed, OAM states can be manipulated with high degree of control to encode quantum information in the infinite OAM Hilbert space spanned by l ∈ Z, i.e. in the qudits ψ = l α l |l [34,62,64,66,[75][76][77][78][79][80].”
From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [34]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New High-Intensity Source of Polarization-Entangled Photon Pairs
Kwiat, P. G., Mattle, K., Weinfurter, H., Zeilinger, A., Sergienko, A. V., & Shih, Y. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.75.4337 · Cited by 3,102
James, D. F. V., Kwiat, P. G., Munro, W. J., & White, A. G. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.052312 · Cited by 2,176 · cited 1×
“2 to maximally-entangled states, see e.g. [15,16]. In order to accurately characterize the produced state we realized a standard quantum state tomography analysis. We used the measurements defined in [17] and followed the maximum likelihood method described therein to evaluate the "most probable" density matr…”
MethodBell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption
Giustina, M., Mech, A., Ramelow, S., Wittmann, B., Kofler, J., Beyer, J., Lita, A., Calkins, B., Gerrits, T., Nam, S. W., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12012 · Cited by 660
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Fujii, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 12769, 10.1364/OE.15.012769 · DOI
- Martin, 2010, New J. Phys., 12, 103005, 10.1088/1367-2630/12/10/103005 · DOI
- Takesue, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 70, 031802, 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.031802 · DOI
- Li, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 053601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.053601 · DOI
- Sharping, 2006, Opt. Express, 14, 12388, 10.1364/OE.14.012388 · DOI
- Clemmen, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 16558, 10.1364/OE.17.016558 · DOI
- Takesue, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 201108, 10.1063/1.2814040 · DOI
- Harada, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 20368, 10.1364/OE.16.020368 · DOI
- Takesue, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 5721, 10.1364/OE.16.005721 · DOI
- Matsuda, 2012, Sci. Rep., 2, 00817, 10.1038/srep00817 · DOI · Paper page
- Fulconis, 2007, Phys. Rev. Lett., 99, 120501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.120501 · DOI · Paper page
- Bogaerts, 2010, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 16, 33, 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2039680 · DOI
- Taillaert, 2003, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett., 15, 1249, 10.1109/LPT.2003.816671 · DOI
- Clemmen, 2012, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 29, 1977, 10.1364/JOSAB.29.001977 · DOI
- Hardy, 1993, Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1665, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1665 · DOI · Paper page
- Clauser, 1969, Phys. Rev. Lett., 23, 880, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880 · DOI · Paper page
- Clauser, 1974, Phys. Rev. D, 10, 526, 10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Photonic quantum information processing: a review
Flamini, F., Spagnolo, N., & Sciarrino, F. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aad5b2 · Cited by 770
Recent advances on integrated quantum communications
Orieux, A., & Diamanti, E. (2016) · Journal of Optics · doi:10.1088/2040-8978/18/8/083002 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Olislager, L., Safioui, J., Clemmen, S., Huy, K. P., Bogaerts, W., Baets, R., Emplit, P., & Massar, S.
- Venue
- Optics Letters
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2013-05-30
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1960
- ISSN
- 0146-9592
- 1539-4794
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Belgian Science Policy Office (IAP P7-35)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
