Cited by 368

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exact solution to simultaneous intensity and phase encryption with a single phase-only hologram

Bolduc, Eliot, Bent, Nicolas, Santamato, Enrico, Karimi, Ebrahim, Boyd, Robert W.·2013·Optics Letters

Abstract

A phase-only hologram applies a modal transformation to an optical transverse spatial mode via phase encoding and intensity masking. Accurate control of the optical field crucially depends on the method employed to encode the hologram. In this Letter, we present a method to encode the amplitude and the phase of an optical field into a phase-only hologram, which allows the exact control of spatial transverse modes. Any intensity masking method modulates the amplitude and alters the phase of the optical field. Our method consists in correcting for this unwanted phase alteration by modifying the phase encryption accordingly. We experimentally verify the accuracy of our method by applying it to the generation and detection of transverse spatial modes in mutually unbiased bases of dimension two and three.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.38.003546

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once generated and analyzed, OAM states can be manipulated with high degree of control to encode quantum information in the infinite OAM Hilbert space.

    “Once generated and analyzed, OAM states can be manipulated with high degree of control to encode quantum information in the infinite OAM Hilbert space spanned by l ∈ Z, i.e. in the qudits ψ = l α l |l [34,62,64,66,[75][76][77][78][79][80].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [62]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Hell, 2007, Science, 316, 1153, 10.1126/science.1137395 · DOI · Paper page
  2. He, 1995, J. Mod. Opt., 42, 217, 10.1080/09500349514550171 · DOI
  3. Paterson, 2001, Science, 292, 912, 10.1126/science.1058591 · DOI
  4. Gibson, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 5448, 10.1364/OPEX.12.005448 · DOI
  5. Franke-Arnold, 2008, Laser Photon. Rev., 2, 299, 10.1002/lpor.200810007 · DOI
  6. Neff, 1990, Proc. IEEE, 78, 826, 10.1109/5.53402 · DOI
  7. Bazhenov, 1992, J. Mod. Opt., 39, 985, 10.1080/09500349214551011 · DOI
  8. Kirk, 1971, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 61, 1023, 10.1364/JOSA.61.001023 · DOI
  9. Davis, 1999, Appl. Opt., 38, 5004, 10.1364/AO.38.005004 · DOI
  10. Leach, 2005, New J. Phys., 7, 55, 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/055 · DOI
  11. Arrizón, 2007, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24, 3500, 10.1364/JOSAA.24.003500 · DOI
  12. Ando, 2009, Opt. Lett., 34, 34, 10.1364/OL.34.000034 · DOI
  13. Wootters, 1989, Ann. Phys., 191, 363, 10.1016/0003-4916(89)90322-9 · DOI
  14. Padgett, 1999, Opt. Lett., 24, 430, 10.1364/OL.24.000430 · DOI
  15. Wiesniak, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 053047, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/053047 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bolduc, E., Bent, N., Santamato, E., Karimi, E., & Boyd, R. W.
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
38
Issue
18
Pages
3546
ISSN
  • 0146-9592
  • 1539-4794
Cited by
368
References
0
Language
en
Funders
  • Canada Excellence Research Chairs
  • FQRNT (149713)
  • European Commission (255914-PHORBITECH)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review