Cited by 43Photonic and Optical DevicesAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and MaterialsPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

GeSn lateral p-i-n waveguide photodetectors for mid-infrared integrated photonics

Abstract

In this Letter, we demonstrate mid-infrared (MIR) lateral p−i−n GeSn waveguide photodetectors (WGPDs) on silicon, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, as a key enabler of MIR electronic–photonic integrated circuits (EPICs). Narrow-bandgap GeSn alloys were employed as the active material to enable efficient photodetection in the MIR region. A lateral p−i−n homojunction diode was designed and fabricated to significantly enhance the optical confinement factor of the guided modes and thus enhance the optical responsivity. Thus, a photodetection range of up to 1950 nm and a good responsivity of 0.292 A/W at 1800 nm were achieved. These results demonstrate the feasibility of planar GeSn WGPDs for monolithic MIR EPICs on silicon.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/ol.414580

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WG-QDPD outperforms monolithically grown GeSn (responsivity < 0.52 A/W and dark current > 1 mA).

    “Notably, these results are on par with the best-performing bonded III-V photodetectors reported in the literature (responsivity 0.4-1.4 A/W around 2.3 μ m and dark current 10 nA-2.5 μ A), 6-9 outperforming monolithically grown GeSn (responsivity &lt; 0.52 A/W and dark current &gt; 1 mA). 13-16”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Wada, 2015, Photonics and Electronics with Germanium, 10.1002/9783527650200 · DOI
  2. Deen, 2012, Silicon Photonics: Fundamentals and Devices, 10.1002/9781119945161 · DOI
  3. Soref, 2014, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 372, 20130113, 10.1098/rsta.2013.0113 · DOI
  4. Soref, 2015, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC), W4
  5. Liu, 2005, Appl. Phys. Lett., 87, 103501, 10.1063/1.2037200 · DOI
  6. Chang, 2016, Opt. Express, 24, 17562, 10.1364/OE.24.017562 · DOI
  7. Ghosh, 2020, Opt. Express, 28, 23739, 10.1364/OE.398046 · DOI
  8. Chang, 2013, J. Phys. D, 46, 065103, 10.1088/0022-3727/46/6/065103 · DOI
  9. D’Costa, 2006, Phys. Rev. B, 73, 125207, 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.125207 · DOI
  10. Chang, 2016, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron., 22, 425, 10.1109/JSTQE.2016.2553447 · DOI
  11. Roucka, 2011, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 47, 213, 10.1109/JQE.2010.2077273 · DOI
  12. Su, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 6400, 10.1364/OE.19.006400 · DOI
  13. Oehme, 2012, Appl. Phys. Lett., 101, 141110, 10.1063/1.4757124 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2013, Appl. Phys. Lett., 102, 141111, 10.1063/1.4801957 · DOI
  15. Tseng, 2013, Appl. Phys. Lett., 103, 231907, 10.1063/1.4840135 · DOI
  16. Chang, 2016, Appl. Phys. Lett., 108, 151101, 10.1063/1.4945816 · DOI
  17. Cong, 2016, IEEE Photon. J., 8, 1, 10.1109/JPHOT.2016.2607687 · DOI
  18. Dong, 2017, Opt. Express, 25, 15818, 10.1364/OE.25.015818 · DOI
  19. Xu, 2018, Opt. Express, 26, 17312, 10.1364/OE.26.017312 · DOI
  20. Tran, 2019, Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO), STh4O.6, 10.1364/CLEO_SI.2019.STh4O.6 · DOI
  21. Peng, 2014, Appl. Phys. Lett., 105, 231109, 10.1063/1.4903881 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Huang, 2017, Opt. Lett., 42, 1652, 10.1364/OL.42.001652 · DOI
  23. Hung, 2020, Opt. Lett., 45, 1088, 10.1364/OL.383171 · DOI
  24. Palik, 1985, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids
  25. Tran, 2016, J. Appl. Phys., 119, 103106, 10.1063/1.4943652 · DOI
  26. Pham, 2016, Opt. Express, 24, 4519, 10.1364/OE.24.004519 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2016, J. Appl. Phys., 119, 213105, 10.1063/1.4953147 · DOI
  28. Liu, 2007, Opt. Express, 15, 623, 10.1364/OE.15.000623 · DOI
  29. Wang, 2008, IEEE Electron. Dev. Lett., 29, 445, 10.1109/LED.2008.920277 · DOI
  30. Chang, 2010, IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 46, 1813, 10.1109/JQE.2010.2059000 · DOI
  31. Virot, 2017, Opt. Express, 25, 19487, 10.1364/OE.25.019487 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tsai, C.-H., Lin, K.-C., Cheng, C.-Y., Lee, K.-C., Cheng, H. H., & Chang, G.-E.
Affiliations
  • National Chung Cheng University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Tsai, Cheng-Hsun
  • Lin, Kuan-Chih
  • Cheng, Chin-Yuan
  • Lee, Kuo-Chih
  • Cheng, H. H.
  • Chang, Guo-En
Venue
Optics Letters
Published
2021-02-10
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
864
ISSN
  • 0146-9592 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-4794
OpenAlex
W3124363531
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Optics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 109-2636-E-194-002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Photonic and Optical Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Keywords
GeSn, waveguide photodetectors, mid-infrared photodetection, optical confinement factor, optical responsivity, electronic-photonic integrated circuits, silicon photonics, monolithic integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review