The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ultrafast resolution of tunneling delay time
Open accessAbstract
We compare the main competing theories of tunneling time against experimental measurements using the attoclock in strong laser field ionization of helium atoms. Refined attoclock measurements reveal a real and not instantaneous tunneling delay time over a large intensity regime, using two different experimental apparatus. Only two of the theoretical predictions are compatible within our experimental error: the Larmor time, and the probability distribution of tunneling times constructed using a Feynman Path Integral (FPI) formulation. The latter better matches the observed qualitative change in tunneling time over a wide intensity range, and predicts a broad tunneling time distribution with a long tail. The implication of such a probability distribution of tunneling times, as opposed to a distinct tunneling time, challenges how valence electron dynamics are currently reconstructed in attosecond science. It means that one must account for a significant uncertainty as to when the hole dynamics begin to evolve.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Real-time observation of valence electron motion
Goulielmakis, E., Loh, Z.-H., Wirth, A., Santra, R., Rohringer, N., Yakovlev, V. S., Zherebtsov, S., Pfeifer, T., Azzeer, A. M., Kling, M. F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09212 · Cited by 1,312
Schultze, M., Fieß, M., Karpowicz, N., Gagnon, J., Korbman, M., Hofstetter, M., Neppl, S., Cavalieri, A. L., Komninos, Y., Mercouris, T., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1189401 · Cited by 1,121
Wirth, A., Hassan, M. T., Grguraš, I., Gagnon, J., Moulet, A., Luu, T. T., Pabst, S., Santra, R., Alahmed, Z. A., Azzeer, A. M., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1210268 · Cited by 664
Cited by
Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ionized iodoacetylene
Kraus, P. M., Mignolet, B., Baykusheva, D., Rupenyan, A., Horný, L., Penka, E. F., Grassi, G., Tolstikhin, O. I., Schneider, J., Jensen, F., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab2160 · Cited by 628
Attosecond chronoscopy of photoemission
Pazourek, R., Nagele, S., & Burgdörfer, J. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.765 · Cited by 442
Interpreting attoclock measurements of tunnelling times
Torlina, L., Morales, F., Kaushal, J., Ivanov, I., Kheifets, A., Zielinski, A., Scrinzi, A., Muller, H. G., Sukiasyan, S., Ivanov, M., et al. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3340 · Cited by 339
Angular dependence of photoemission time delay in helium
Heuser, S., Jiménez Galán, Á., Cirelli, C., Marante, C., Sabbar, M., Boge, R., Lucchini, M., Gallmann, L., Ivanov, I., Kheifets, A. S., et al. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.063409 · Cited by 161
Self-citationResonance Effects in Photoemission Time Delays
Sabbar, M., Heuser, S., Boge, R., Lucchini, M., Carette, T., Lindroth, E., Gallmann, L., Cirelli, C., & Keller, U. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.133001 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Landsman, A. S., Weger, M., Maurer, J., Boge, R., Ludwig, A., Heuser, S., Cirelli, C., Gallmann, L., & Keller, U.
- Venue
- Optica
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2014-11-14
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 343
- ISSN
- 2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3105486811
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafast resolution of tunneling delay time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/optica.1.000343
- The paper
- Landsman, A. S., Weger, M., Maurer, J., Boge, R., Ludwig, A., Heuser, S., Cirelli, C., Gallmann, L., & Keller, U. (2014). Ultrafast resolution of tunneling delay time. Optica. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.1.000343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
