Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Further improvements to the ptychographical iterative engine

Open access
Maiden, Andrew, Johnson, Daniel, Li, Peng·2017·Optica

Abstract

Ptychography is a form of phase imaging that uses iterative algorithms to reconstruct an image of a specimen from a series of diffraction patterns. It is swiftly developing into a mainstream technique, with a growing list of applications across a range of imaging modalities. As the field has advanced, numerous reconstruction algorithms have been proposed, yet the early approaches have not seen major improvement and remain popular. In this paper, we revisit the first such algorithm, the ptychographical iterative engine (PIE), and show how a simple revision and powerful extension can deliver an order of magnitude speed increase and handle difficult data sets where the original version fails completely.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/optica.4.000736

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Metadata

Authors
Maiden, A., Johnson, D., & Li, P.
Venue
Optica
Published
2017-06-30
Volume
4
Issue
7
Pages
736
ISSN
2334-2536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2728611525
Cited by
452
References
24
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further improvements to the ptychographical iterative engine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/optica.4.000736
The paper
Maiden, A., Johnson, D., & Li, P. (2017). Further improvements to the ptychographical iterative engine. Optica. https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.