The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conformal frequency conversion for arbitrary vectorial structured light
Abstract
Vectorial structured light with spatially varying amplitude, phase, and polarization is reshaping many areas of modern optics, including nonlinear optics, as diverse parametric processes can be used to explore interactions between such complex vector fields, extending the frontiers of optics to new physical phenomena. However, the most basic nonlinear application (i.e., frequency conversion), still remains challenging for vectorial structured light since parametric processes are polarization dependent, leading to a change in the spatial topological structure of signals. In this work, to break this fundamental limit, we propose a conformal frequency conversion scheme that allows the full spatial structure of vectorial structured light to be maintained in the conversion. We systematically examine its spatial polarization independence based on nondegenerate sum-frequency generation with type-0 phase matching. This proof-of-principle demonstration paves the way for a wide range of applications that require conformal frequency conversion, and, particularly, to implement frequency interfaces with multimodal communications channels, high-dimensional quantum states, and polarization-resolved upconversion imaging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Momentum-space magnetic skyrmions were previously studied to demonstrate the anomalous Hall effect in magnets.
“The momentum-space magnetic skyrmions were previously studied to demonstrate anomalous Hall effect in magnets [86,87].”
From Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light (2024) · cites this paper as [87]
The “Optical Skyrmions” passage in section C says skyrmions have previously been studied in magnetic materials. It does not say those studies concerned momentum-space magnetic skyrmions or demonstrated the anomalous Hall effect. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Higher-Order Poincaré Sphere, Stokes Parameters, and the Angular Momentum of Light
Milione, G., Sztul, H. I., Nolan, D. A., & Alfano, R. R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.053601 · Cited by 930
Optical skyrmion lattice in evanescent electromagnetic fields
Tsesses, S., Ostrovsky, E., Cohen, K., Gjonaj, B., Lindner, N. H., & Bartal, G. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau0227 · Cited by 514
Generation of Optical Skyrmions with Tunable Topological Textures
Shen, Y., Martínez, E. C., & Rosales-Guzmán, C. (2022) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.1c01703 · Cited by 278
Self-citationNagali, E., Sansoni, L., Marrucci, L., Santamato, E., & Sciarrino, F. (2010) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.052317 · Cited by 80
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- Boyd, 2003, Nonlinear Optics
- Agrawal, 2012, Contemporary Nonlinear Optics
- Barh, 2019, Adv. Opt. Photon., 11, 952, 10.1364/AOP.11.000952 · DOI
- Qiu, 2018, Optica, 5, 208, 10.1364/OPTICA.5.000208 · DOI
- Zhou, 2016, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 103601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.103601 · DOI
- Armstrong, 1962, Phys. Rev., 127, 1918, 10.1103/PhysRev.127.1918 · DOI
- Hu, 2020, Adv. Mater., 32, 1903775, 10.1002/adma.201903775 · DOI
- Dam, 2012, Nat. Photonics, 6, 788, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.231 · DOI
- Zhou, 2016, Light Sci. Appl., 5, e16019, 10.1038/lsa.2016.19 · DOI
- Forbes, 2021, Nat. Photonics, 15, 253, 10.1038/s41566-021-00780-4 · DOI
- Rosales-Guzmán, 2018, J. Opt., 20, 123001, 10.1088/2040-8986/aaeb7d · DOI
- Shen, 2019, Light Sci. Appl., 8, 90, 10.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Rubinsztein-Dunlop, 2017, J. Opt., 19, 013001, 10.1088/2040-8978/19/1/013001 · DOI
- Rosales-Guzmán, 2017, How to Shape Light with Spatial Light Modulators, 10.1117/3.2281295 · DOI
- Chen, 2019, Adv. Mater., 32, 1903665, 10.1002/adma.201903665 · DOI
- Dorn, 2003, Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 233901, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.233901 · DOI
- Török, 2004, Opt. Express, 12, 3605, 10.1364/OPEX.12.003605 · DOI
- D’Ambrosio, 2016, Phys. Rev. A, 94, 030304, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.030304 · DOI
- Berg-Johansen, 2015, Optica, 2, 864, 10.1364/OPTICA.2.000864 · DOI
- Marrucci, 2011, J. Opt., 13, 064001, 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064001 · DOI · Paper page
- Norrman, 2020, Optica, 7, 93, 10.1364/OPTICA.7.000093 · DOI
- Otte, 2018, Light Sci. Appl., 7, 18009, 10.1038/lsa.2018.9 · DOI
- Zhou, 2017, Sci. Bull., 62, 1185, 10.1016/j.scib.2017.08.024 · DOI
- Courtial, 1997, Phys. Rev. A, 56, 4193, 10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4193 · DOI
- Caetano, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 041801, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.041801 · DOI
- Zhu, 2016, Optica, 3, 212, 10.1364/OPTICA.3.000212 · DOI
- Law, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 127903, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127903 · DOI
- Dada, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 677, 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
- Salakhutdinov, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 108, 173604, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.173604 · DOI
- Wu, 2020, Phys. Rev. A, 101, 063805, 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.063805 · DOI
- Buono, 2020, Phys. Rev. A, 101, 043821, 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.043821 · DOI
- Offer, 2021, Phys. Rev. A, 103, L021502, 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.L021502 · DOI
- D’Errico, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 2388, 10.1364/OL.424619 · DOI
- Khoury, 2020, Phys. Rev. A, 102, 033708, 10.1103/PhysRevA.102.033708 · DOI
- de Oliveira, 2020, Phys. Rev. Appl., 14, 024048, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024048 · DOI
- da Silva, 2021, Nanophotonics, 2021, 0493, 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0493 · DOI
- Souza, 2008, Phys. Rev. A, 77, 032345, 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.032345 · DOI
- Vallone, 2014, Phys. Rev. Lett., 113, 060503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.060503 · DOI
- Zhu, 2021, Nat. Commun., 12, 1666, 10.1038/s41467-021-21793-1 · DOI
- Wu, 2019, Phys. Rev. A, 100, 053840, 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.053840 · DOI
- Pereira, 2017, Phys. Rev. A, 96, 053856, 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053856 · DOI
- Wu, 2019, Phys. Rev. A, 99, 023830, 10.1103/PhysRevA.99.023830 · DOI
- da Silva, 2021, Phys. Rev. Appl., 15, 024039, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.024039 · DOI
- Chekhova, 2016, Adv. Opt. Photon., 8, 104, 10.1364/AOP.8.000104 · DOI
- Shi, 2004, Phys. Rev. A, 69, 013803, 10.1103/PhysRevA.69.013803 · DOI · Paper page
- Yin, 2020, Nature, 582, 501, 10.1038/s41586-020-2401-y · DOI
- Yin, 2017, Science, 356, 1140, 10.1126/science.aan3211 · DOI
- Kwiat, 1999, Phys. Rev. A, 60, R773, 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.R773 · DOI · Paper page
- de Oliveira, 2020, ACS Photon., 7, 249, 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b01524 · DOI
- Wu, 2020, Phys. Rev. Appl., 13, 064041, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.064041 · DOI
- Ren, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 2300, 10.1364/OL.419753 · DOI
- Wang, 1999, Opt. Lett., 24, 978, 10.1364/OL.24.000978 · DOI
- Chen, 2009, Opt. Express, 17, 6727, 10.1364/OE.17.006727 · DOI
- Zhong, 2021, Phys. Rev. A, 103, 053520, 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.053520 · DOI
- Yang, 2020, Opt. Lett., 45, 3034, 10.1364/OL.393146 · DOI
- Aagedal, 1997, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 14, 1549, 10.1364/JOSAA.14.001549 · DOI
- Gori, 1994, Opt. Commun., 107, 335, 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90342-5 · DOI
- Wu, 2021, Front. Phys., 9, 654451, 10.3389/fphy.2021.654451 · DOI
- Xu, 2020, Opt. Express, 28, 5077, 10.1364/OE.386189 · DOI
- Selyem, 2019, Phys. Rev. A, 100, 063842, 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.063842 · DOI
- Sit, 2017, Optica, 4, 1006, 10.1364/OPTICA.4.001006 · DOI · Paper page
- Brandt, 2020, Optica, 7, 98, 10.1364/OPTICA.375875 · DOI
- Li, 2020, Appl. Phys. Lett., 116, 221105, 10.1063/5.0011142 · DOI
- Plick, 2013, Phys. Rev. A, 87, 033806, 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.033806 · DOI
- Bandres, 2004, Opt. Lett., 29, 144, 10.1364/OL.29.000144 · DOI
- da Silva, 2020, Phys. Rev. Lett., 124, 033902, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.033902 · DOI
- Göbel, 2021, Phys. Rep., 895, 1, 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.001 · DOI
- Du, 2019, Nat. Phys., 15, 650, 10.1038/s41567-019-0487-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Shen, 2021, Nat. Commun., 12, 5891, 10.1038/s41467-021-26037-w · DOI
- Shen, 2021, Opt. Lett., 46, 3737, 10.1364/OL.431122 · DOI · Paper page
- Sroor, 2020, Nat. Photonics, 14, 498, 10.1038/s41566-020-0623-z · DOI
- Naidoo, 2016, Nat. Photonics, 10, 327, 10.1038/nphoton.2016.37 · DOI
- Qu, 2019, Phys. Rev. Lett., 123, 243601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.243601 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Optical skyrmions and other topological quasiparticles of light
Shen, Y., Zhang, Q., Shi, P., Du, L., Yuan, X., & Zayats, A. V. (2024) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-023-01325-7 · Cited by 469
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, H.-J., Yu, B.-S., Zhu, Z.-H., Gao, W., Ding, D.-S., Zhou, Z.-Y., Hu, X.-P., Rosales-Guzmán, C., Shen, Y., & Shi, B.-S.
- Venue
- Optica
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2022-02-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187
- ISSN
- 2334-2536
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11934013, 12174185, 61975047, 62075050, U20A20218)
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0304800)
- High-Level Talents Project of Heilongjiang Province (2020GSP12)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review