Cited by 55Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationElectronic Health Records Systems

Sustainability of a Primary Care–Driven eConsult Service

Open access
Liddy, Clare, Moroz, Isabella, Afkham, Amir, Keely, Erin·2018·The Annals of Family Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE: Excessive wait times for specialist appointments pose a serious barrier to patient care. To improve access to specialist care and reduce wait times, we launched the Champlain BASE (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service in April 2011. The objective of this study is to report on the impact of our multiple specialty eConsult service during the first 5 years of use after implementation, with a focus on growth and sustainability. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all eConsult cases submitted between April 1, 2011 and April 30, 2016, and measured impact with system utilization data and mandatory close-out surveys completed at the end of each eConsult. Impact indicators included time interval to obtain specialist advice, effect of specialist advice on the primary care clinician's course of action, and rate of avoidance of face-to-face visits. RESULTS: A total of 14,105 eConsult cases were directed to 56 different medical specialty groups, completed with a median response time of 21 hours, and 65% of all eConsults were resolved without a specialist visit. We observed rapid growth in the use of eConsult during the study period: 5 years after implementation the system was in use by 1,020 primary care clinicians, with more than 700 consultations taking place per month. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the first in-depth look at the growth and sustainability of the multispecialty eConsult service. The results show the positive impact of an eConsult service and can inform other regions interested in implementing similar systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1370/afm.2177

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Champlain BASE eConsult service specialists respond to cases in a median of 0.9 days and two-thirds of patients receive care without needing a face-to-face specialist visit.

    “Specialists respond to cases in a median of 0.9 days and two-thirds of patients receive care without needing a face-to-face specialist visit [7].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Liddy C, Rowan MS, Afkham A, Maranger J, Keely E. Building access to specialist care through e-consultation. Open Med. 2013; 7(1): e1-e8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liddy, C., Moroz, I., Afkham, A., & Keely, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Bruyère (CA)
  • Champlain Local Health Integration Network (CA)
Venue
The Annals of Family Medicine
Published
2018-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
120-126
ISSN
  • 1544-1709 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-1717
OpenAlex
W2789287713
Cited by
55
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Family Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-consultation, access to specialist care, service sustainability, system utilization
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Ontario, Primary Health Care, Specialization, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review