The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural Organization of the 19S Proteasome Lid: Insights from MS of Intact Complexes
Open accessAbstract
The 26S proteasome contains a 19S regulatory particle that selects and unfolds ubiquitinated substrates for degradation in the 20S catalytic particle. To date there are no high-resolution structures of the 19S assembly, nor of the lid or base subcomplexes that constitute the 19S. Mass spectra of the intact lid complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae show that eight of the nine subunits are present stoichiometrically and that a stable tetrameric subcomplex forms in solution. Application of tandem mass spectrometry to the intact lid complex reveals the subunit architecture, while the coupling of a cross-linking approach identifies further interaction partners. Taking together our results with previous analyses we are able to construct a comprehensive interaction map. In summary, our findings allow us to identify a scaffold for the assembly of the particle and to propose a regulatory mechanism that prevents exposure of the active site until assembly is complete. More generally, the results highlight the potential of mass spectrometry to add crucial insight into the structural organization of an endogenous, wild-type complex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome
Ito, T., Chiba, T., Ozawa, R., Yoshida, M., Hattori, M., & Sakaki, Y. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.061034498 · Cited by 3,566
Cope, G. A., & Deshaies, R. J. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00722-0 · Cited by 409
Self-citation
Cited by
Recognition and Processing of Ubiquitin-Protein Conjugates by the Proteasome
Finley, D. (2009) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607 · Cited by 1,764
Native mass spectrometry: a bridge between interactomics and structural biology
Heck, A. J. R. (2008) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1265 · Cited by 766
Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry
Gingras, A.-C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B., & Aebersold, R. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2208 · Cited by 708
Determining the stoichiometry and interactions of macromolecular assemblies from mass spectrometry
Hernández, H., & Robinson, C. V. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.73 · Cited by 655
Self-citationMolecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly
Murata, S., Yashiroda, H., & Tanaka, K. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2630 · Cited by 546
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharon, M., Taverner, T., Ambroggio, X. I., Deshaies, R. J., & Robinson, C. V.
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e267
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- OpenAlex
- W2143375105
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural Organization of the 19S Proteasome Lid: Insights from MS of Intact Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040267
- The paper
- Sharon, M., Taverner, T., Ambroggio, X. I., Deshaies, R. J., & Robinson, C. V. (2006). Structural Organization of the 19S Proteasome Lid: Insights from MS of Intact Complexes. PLoS Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040267
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.