The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Transcriptional Terminators in Bacillus subtilis and Related Species
Open accessAbstract
In prokaryotes, genes belonging to the same operon are transcribed in a single mRNA molecule. Transcription starts as the RNA polymerase binds to the promoter and continues until it reaches a transcriptional terminator. Some terminators rely on the presence of the Rho protein, whereas others function independently of Rho. Such Rho-independent terminators consist of an inverted repeat followed by a stretch of thymine residues, allowing us to predict their presence directly from the DNA sequence. Unlike in Escherichia coli, the Rho protein is dispensable in Bacillus subtilis, suggesting a limited role for Rho-dependent termination in this organism and possibly in other Firmicutes. We analyzed 463 experimentally known terminating sequences in B. subtilis and found a decision rule to distinguish Rho-independent transcriptional terminators from non-terminating sequences. The decision rule allowed us to find the boundaries of operons in B. subtilis with a sensitivity and specificity of about 94%. Using the same decision rule, we found an average sensitivity of 94% for 57 bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes phylum, and a considerably lower sensitivity for other bacteria. Our analysis shows that Rho-independent termination is dominant for Firmicutes in general, and that the properties of the transcriptional terminators are conserved. Terminator prediction can be used to reliably predict the operon structure in these organisms, even in the absence of experimentally known operons. Genome-wide predictions of Rho-independent terminators for the 57 Firmicutes are available in the Supporting Information section.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction
Zuker, M. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg595 · Cited by 13,404
Mathews, D. H., Sabina, J., Zuker, M., & Turner, D. H. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2700 · Cited by 3,795
Cited by
Principles of genetic circuit design
Brophy, J. A. N., & Voigt, C. A. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2926 · Cited by 931
Transcriptome complexity in a genome-reduced bacterium
Güell, M., van Noort, V., Yus, E., Chen, W.-H., Leigh-Bell, J., Michalodimitrakis, K., Yamada, T., Arumugam, M., Doerks, T., Kühner, S., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1176951 · Cited by 418
Structure and Mechanism of a Metal-Sensing Regulatory RNA
Dann, C. E., Wakeman, C. A., Sieling, C. L., Baker, S. C., Irnov, I., & Winkler, W. C. (2007) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.051 · Cited by 386
Term-seq reveals abundant ribo-regulation of antibiotics resistance in bacteria
Dar, D., Shamir, M., Mellin, J. R., Koutero, M., Stern-Ginossar, N., Cossart, P., & Sorek, R. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9822 · Cited by 355
Bacterial Transcription Terminators: The RNA 3′-End Chronicles
Peters, J. M., Vangeloff, A. D., & Landick, R. (2011) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2011.03.036 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- de Hoon, M. J. L., Makita, Y., Nakai, K., & Miyano, S.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-08-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e25
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2120900330
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of Transcriptional Terminators in Bacillus subtilis and Related Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010025
- The paper
- de Hoon, M. J. L., Makita, Y., Nakai, K., & Miyano, S. (2005). Prediction of Transcriptional Terminators in Bacillus subtilis and Related Species. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.