The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dynamical Systems Hypothesis of Schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
We propose a top-down approach to the symptoms of schizophrenia based on a statistical dynamical framework. We show that a reduced depth in the basins of attraction of cortical attractor states destabilizes the activity at the network level due to the constant statistical fluctuations caused by the stochastic spiking of neurons. In integrate-and-fire network simulations, a decrease in the NMDA receptor conductances, which reduces the depth of the attractor basins, decreases the stability of short-term memory states and increases distractibility. The cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia such as distractibility, working memory deficits, or poor attention could be caused by this instability of attractor states in prefrontal cortical networks. Lower firing rates are also produced, and in the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortex could account for the negative symptoms, including a reduction of emotions. Decreasing the GABA as well as the NMDA conductances produces not only switches between the attractor states, but also jumps from spontaneous activity into one of the attractors. We relate this to the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions, paranoia, and hallucinations, which may arise because the basins of attraction are shallow and there is instability in temporal lobe semantic memory networks, leading thoughts to move too freely round the attractor energy landscape.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, the discrete-pool model used in Loh et al. (2007) cannot capture features that emerge naturally from a continuous model described here: Broadening of WM representations, smooth random drift of memory, and sensitivity to target-distractor similarity.”
From Linking microcircuit dysfunction to cognitive impairment: Effects of disinhibition associated with schizophrenia in a cortical working memory model (2014) · cites this paper as Loh et al. 2007
In the citing paper
“Increased miss rate would be expected if the persistent activity pattern was completely lost in the target cells (Loh et al. 2007), or a bump spontaneously appeared in nontarget cells, interfering with target encoding (Cano-Colino and Compte 2012).”
From Linking microcircuit dysfunction to cognitive impairment: Effects of disinhibition associated with schizophrenia in a cortical working memory model (2014) · cites this paper as Loh et al. 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Introduction to the theory of neural computation
Hertz, J., Krogh, A., & Palmer, R. G. (1994) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/0893-6080(94)90014-0 · Cited by 6,410
What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.321 · Cited by 3,516
Cortical inhibitory neurons and schizophrenia
Lewis, D. A., Hashimoto, T., & Volk, D. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1648 · Cited by 2,297
Amit, D. J. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511623257 · Cited by 2,261
The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex
Seamans, J. K., & Yang, C. R. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.05.006 · Cited by 1,592
Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia.
Cohen, J. D., & Servan‐Schreiber, D. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.45 · Cited by 1,513
The Symptoms of Chronic Schizophrenia
Liddle, P. F. (1987) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.151.2.145 · Cited by 1,461
D1 Dopamine Receptors in Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement in Working Memory
Sawaguchi, T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1825731 · Cited by 1,364
Probabilistic decision making by slow reverberation in cortical circuits
Wang, X.-J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01092-9 · Cited by 1,242
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- RollsET 2005 Emotion explained Oxford Oxford University Press 606
- AbelesM 1991 Corticonics New York Cambridge University Press 280
- BraitenbergVSchützA 1991 Anatomy of the cortex Berlin Springer Verlag 249
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dynamic models of large-scale brain activity
Breakspear, M. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4497 · Cited by 1,239
The orbitofrontal cortex and beyond: From affect to decision-making
Rolls, E. T., & Fabian Grabenhorst, B. (2008) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.001 · Cited by 851
Self-citationValue, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex
Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.004 · Cited by 766
Self-citationDurstewitz, D., & Seamans, J. K. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.015 · Cited by 586
Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition
Cocchi, L., Gollo, L. L., Zalesky, A., & Breakspear, M. J. (2017) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.002 · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Loh, M., Rolls, E. T., & Deco, G.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Rolls, Edmund T
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-11-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e228
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC2065887
- OpenAlex
- W2113693127
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, dynamical systems, basins of attraction, short-term memory, distractibility, working memory deficits, negative symptoms, positive symptoms, orbitofrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, statistical fluctuations, network stability
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Schizophrenia, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, GABA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review