The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting Protein Ligand Binding Sites by Combining Evolutionary Sequence Conservation and 3D Structure
Open accessAbstract
Identifying a protein's functional sites is an important step towards characterizing its molecular function. Numerous structure- and sequence-based methods have been developed for this problem. Here we introduce ConCavity, a small molecule binding site prediction algorithm that integrates evolutionary sequence conservation estimates with structure-based methods for identifying protein surface cavities. In large-scale testing on a diverse set of single- and multi-chain protein structures, we show that ConCavity substantially outperforms existing methods for identifying both 3D ligand binding pockets and individual ligand binding residues. As part of our testing, we perform one of the first direct comparisons of conservation-based and structure-based methods. We find that the two approaches provide largely complementary information, which can be combined to improve upon either approach alone. We also demonstrate that ConCavity has state-of-the-art performance in predicting catalytic sites and drug binding pockets. Overall, the algorithms and analysis presented here significantly improve our ability to identify ligand binding sites and further advance our understanding of the relationship between evolutionary sequence conservation and structural and functional attributes of proteins. Data, source code, and prediction visualizations are available on the ConCavity web site (http://compbio.cs.princeton.edu/concavity/).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to information retrieval
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2715 · Cited by 12,278
Introduction to Information Retrieval
Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809071 · Cited by 11,288
Dundas, J., Ouyang, Z., Tseng, J., Binkowski, A., Turpaz, Y., & Liang, J. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkl282 · Cited by 1,725
Qualia: The Geometry of Integrated Information
Balduzzi, D., & Tononi, G. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000462 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery
Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · Cited by 762
Zhang, C., Freddolino, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx366 · Cited by 606
DeepDrug3D: Classification of ligand-binding pockets in proteins with a convolutional neural network
Pu, L., Govindaraj, R. G., Lemoine, J. M., Wu, H.-C., & Brylinski, M. (2019) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006718 · Cited by 133
The Design of Covalent Allosteric Drugs
Nussinov, R., & Tsai, C.-J. (2015) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010814-124401 · Cited by 112
Spatiotemporal identification of druggable binding sites using deep learning
Kozlovskii, I., & Popov, P. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01350-0 · Cited by 89
Rational Engineering of Enzyme Allosteric Regulation through Sequence Evolution Analysis
Yang, J.-S., Seo, S. W., Jang, S., Jung, G. Y., & Kim, S. (2012) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002612 · Cited by 87
Stein, D., Kars, M. E., Wu, Y., Bayrak, Ç. S., Stenson, P. D., Cooper, D. N., Schlessinger, A., & Itan, Y. (2023) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-023-01261-9 · Cited by 53
Smith, Z., Strobel, M., Vani, B. P., & Tiwary, P. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01698 · Cited by 47
Nordquist, E. B., Zhao, M., Kumar, A., & MacKerell, A. D. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01189 · Cited by 15
A structural database of chain–chain and domain–domain interfaces of proteins
Sen, N., & Madhusudhan, M. S. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4406 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Capra, J. A., Laskowski, R. A., Thornton, J. M., Singh, M., & Funkhouser, T. A.
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-12-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e1000585
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2132395520
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.