The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probability Matching as a Computational Strategy Used in Perception
Open accessAbstract
The question of which strategy is employed in human decision making has been studied extensively in the context of cognitive tasks; however, this question has not been investigated systematically in the context of perceptual tasks. The goal of this study was to gain insight into the decision-making strategy used by human observers in a low-level perceptual task. Data from more than 100 individuals who participated in an auditory-visual spatial localization task was evaluated to examine which of three plausible strategies could account for each observer's behavior the best. This task is very suitable for exploring this question because it involves an implicit inference about whether the auditory and visual stimuli were caused by the same object or independent objects, and provides different strategies of how using the inference about causes can lead to distinctly different spatial estimates and response patterns. For example, employing the commonly used cost function of minimizing the mean squared error of spatial estimates would result in a weighted averaging of estimates corresponding to different causal structures. A strategy that would minimize the error in the inferred causal structure would result in the selection of the most likely causal structure and sticking with it in the subsequent inference of location-"model selection." A third strategy is one that selects a causal structure in proportion to its probability, thus attempting to match the probability of the inferred causal structure. This type of probability matching strategy has been reported to be used by participants predominantly in cognitive tasks. Comparing these three strategies, the behavior of the vast majority of observers in this perceptual task was most consistent with probability matching. While this appears to be a suboptimal strategy and hence a surprising choice for the perceptual system to adopt, we discuss potential advantages of such a strategy for perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bayesian samplers can match behavioral stochasticity in tasks such as perception, categorization, causal reasoning, and decision making [20,21,23,24].”
From Bayesian Brains without Probabilities (2016) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Theory of games and economic behavior
Garcia, S. R., & Miller, S. J. (2019) · American Mathematical Society eBooks · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,777
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Signal detection theory and psychophysics
Ingleby, D. (1967) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/0022-460x(67)90197-6 · Cited by 8,616
Jeffreys, H., Moran, P. A. P., & Chatfield, C. (1922) · Nature · doi:10.1038/109132a0 · Cited by 7,877
A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination
NAGELKERKE, N. J. D. (1991) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/78.3.691 · Cited by 5,927
The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
Harrison, R. W., von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1945) · Journal of Farm Economics · doi:10.2307/1232672 · Cited by 5,318
Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion
Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415429a · Cited by 4,844
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,481
The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration
Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029 · Cited by 1,936
Perception as Bayesian Inference
(1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511984037 · Cited by 1,425
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Behavioral, Neural, and Computational Principles of Bodily Self-Consciousness
Blanke, O., Slater, M., & Serino, A. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.029 · Cited by 698
Kilteni, K., Maselli, A., Kording, K. P., & Slater, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00141 · Cited by 549
Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience.
Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0026450 · Cited by 436
Cortical Hierarchies Perform Bayesian Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception
Rohe, T., & Noppeney, U. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002073 · Cited by 344
Bayesian Brains without Probabilities
Sanborn, A. N., & Chater, N. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.003 · Cited by 307
Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference
Samad, M., Chung, A. J., & Shams, L. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117178 · Cited by 315
Self-citationThe Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8 · Cited by 329
Crossmodal influences on visual perception
Shams, L. B., & Kim, R. S. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.006 · Cited by 252
Causal Inference in the Multisensory Brain
Cao, Y., Summerfield, C., Park, H., Giordano, B. L., & Kayser, C. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.043 · Cited by 207
The neural dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference in multisensory perception
Rohe, T., Ehlis, A.-C., & Noppeney, U. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09664-2 · Cited by 187
Assessing the Role of the ‘Unity Assumption’ on Multisensory Integration: A Review
Chen, Y., & Spence, C. J. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00445 · Cited by 216
A common rule for decision making in animal collectives across species
Arganda, S., Pérez‐Escudero, A., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210664109 · Cited by 166
Biases in Visual, Auditory, and Audiovisual Perception of Space
Odegaard, B., Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004649 · Cited by 155
On the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference
Acerbi, L., Vijayakumar, S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003661 · Cited by 145
Multisensory Causal Inference in the Brain
Kayser, C., & Shams, L. B. (2015) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002075 · Cited by 155
Bayesian causal inference: A unifying neuroscience theory
Shams, L. B., & Beierholm, U. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104619 · Cited by 140
Recalibration of Auditory Space following Milliseconds of Cross-Modal Discrepancy
Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6079-10.2011 · Cited by 129
Sensory reliability shapes perceptual inference via two mechanisms
Rohe, T., & Noppeney, U. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.5.22 · Cited by 136
Perceptual Inference, Learning, and Attention in a Multisensory World
Noppeney, U. (2021) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-100120-085519 · Cited by 147
Metacognition in Multisensory Perception
Deroy, O. D., Spence, C. J., & Noppeney, U. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.006 · Cited by 140
Collective Animal Behavior from Bayesian Estimation and Probability Matching
Pérez‐Escudero, A., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002282 · Cited by 112
Acerbi, L., Dokka, K., Angelaki, D. E., & Ma, W. J. (2018) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006110 · Cited by 111
Cléry, J. C., Guipponi, O., Odouard, S., Pinède, S., Wardak, C., & Hamed, S. B. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0610-17.2017 · Cited by 111
To integrate or not to integrate: Temporal dynamics of hierarchical Bayesian causal inference
Aller, M., & Noppeney, U. (2019) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000210 · Cited by 98
Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion
Dokka, K., Park, H., Jansen, M., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1820373116 · Cited by 80
Where do hypotheses come from?
Dasgupta, I., Schulz, E., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.001 · Cited by 100
Magnotti, J. F., & Beauchamp, M. S. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005229 · Cited by 96
Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex
Li, H.-H., Sprague, T. C., Yoo, A. H., Ma, W. J., & Curtis, C. E. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.022 · Cited by 81
Uncertainty-based inference of a common cause for body ownership
Chancel, M., Ehrsson, H. H., & Ma, W. J. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77221 · Cited by 97
The Brain’s Tendency to Bind Audiovisual Signals Is Stable but Not General
Odegaard, B., & Shams, L. B. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616628860 · Cited by 86
Reliability-Weighted Integration of Audiovisual Signals Can Be Modulated by Top-down Attention
Rohe, T., & Noppeney, U. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0315-17.2018 · Cited by 77
Badde, S., Navarro, K. T., & Landy, M. S. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104170 · Cited by 79
Ageing and multisensory integration: A review of the evidence, and a computational perspective
Jones, S. A., & Noppeney, U. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.001 · Cited by 76
The effects of selective and divided attention on sensory precision and integration
Odegaard, B., Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2015) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.12.039 · Cited by 68
The Development of Audio-Visual Integration for Temporal Judgements
Adams, W. J. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004865 · Cited by 66
Formal models and quantitative measures of multisensory integration: a selective overview
Colonius, H., & Diederich, A. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13813 · Cited by 68
Integration of audiovisual spatial signals is not consistent with maximum likelihood estimation
Meijer, D., Veselič, S., Calafiore, C., & Noppeney, U. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.03.026 · Cited by 67
The Size-Weight Illusion is not anti-Bayesian after all: a unifying Bayesian account
Peters, M. A. K., Ma, W. J., & Shams, L. B. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.2124 · Cited by 61
Eckstein, M. P., Mack, S. C., Liston, D. B., Bogusch, L., Menzel, R., & Krauzlis, R. J. (2013) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.011 · Cited by 63
How Haptic Size Sensations Improve Distance Perception
Battaglia, P., Kersten, D., & Schrater, P. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002080 · Cited by 58
Computational Characterization of Visually Induced Auditory Spatial Adaptation
Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2011) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2011.00075 · Cited by 58
Causal Inference in Multisensory Heading Estimation
de Winkel, K. N., Katliar, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169676 · Cited by 60
A biologically inspired neurocomputational model for audiovisual integration and causal inference
Cuppini, C., Shams, L. B., Magosso, E., & Ursino, M. (2017) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.13725 · Cited by 54
Multisensory Integration Develops Prior to Crossmodal Recalibration
Rohlf, S., Li, L., Bruns, P., & Röder, B. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.048 · Cited by 54
Optimal visual–vestibular integration under conditions of conflicting intersensory motion profiles
Butler, J. S., Campos, J. L., & Bülthoff, H. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4136-1 · Cited by 56
Using psychophysics to ask if the brain samples or maximizes
Acuna, D. E., Berniker, M., Fernandes, H. L., & Kording, K. P. (2015) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/15.3.7 · Cited by 51
Causal Inference in the Perception of Verticality
de Winkel, K. N., Katliar, M., Diers, D., & Bülthoff, H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-23838-w · Cited by 52
Causal Inference for Spatial Constancy across Saccades
Atsma, J., Maij, F., Koppen, M., Irwin, D. E., & Medendorp, W. P. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004766 · Cited by 48
Visual Attention Saccadic Models Learn to Emulate Gaze Patterns From Childhood to Adulthood
Meur, O. L., Coutrot, A., Liu, Z., Pia Rämä, A., Roch, A. L., & Helo, A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2017.2722238 · Cited by 50
A detailed comparison of optimality and simplicity in perceptual decision making.
Shen, S., & Ma, W. J. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000028 · Cited by 46
A simple and efficient method to enhance audiovisual binding tendencies
Odegaard, B., Wozny, D. R., & Shams, L. B. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3143 · Cited by 49
Forced Fusion in Multisensory Heading Estimation
de Winkel, K. N., Katliar, M., & Bülthoff, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127104 · Cited by 50
Human online adaptation to changes in prior probability
Norton, E. H., Acerbi, L., Ma, W. J., & Landy, M. S. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006681 · Cited by 42
Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion
Noel, J., & Angelaki, D. E. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-021021-103038 · Cited by 43
Enhancement Through Coordination
O’Callaghan, C. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315733029-11 · Cited by 42
Ong, J., Tavakkoli, A., Strangman, G. E., Zaman, N., Kamran, S. A., Zhang, Q., Ivković, V., & Lee, A. G. (2022) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.04.004 · Cited by 39
Is that what Bayesians believe? Reply to Griffiths, Chater, Norris, and Pouget (2012).
Bowers, J. S., & Davis, C. J. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027750 · Cited by 38
Changing the Tendency to Integrate the Senses
Quintero, S. I., Shams, L. B., & Kamal, K. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12101384 · Cited by 43
Multisensory Encoding Improves Auditory Recognition
Moran, Z. D., Bachman, P., Pham, P., Cho, S. H., Cannon, T. D., & Shams, L. B. (2013) · Multisensory Research · doi:10.1163/22134808-00002436 · Cited by 45
Heterogeneous Preference and Local Nonlinearity in Consensus Decision Making
Hartnett, A. T., Schertzer, E., Levin, S. A., & Couzin, I. D. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.038701 · Cited by 37
Older adults sacrifice response speed to preserve multisensory integration performance
Jones, S. A., Beierholm, U., Meijer, D., & Noppeney, U. (2019) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.08.017 · Cited by 40
Cognitive diagnosis models for multiple strategies
Ma, W., & Guo, W. (2019) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12155 · Cited by 36
Simulation of cholinergic and noradrenergic modulation of behavior in uncertain environments
Avery, M. C., Nitz, D. A., Chiba, A. A., & Krichmar, J. L. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00005 · Cited by 36
Ferrari, A., & Noppeney, U. (2021) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001465 · Cited by 37
Harootonian, S. K., Ekstrom, A. D., & Wilson, R. C. (2022) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009222 · Cited by 36
Colonius, H., & Diederich, A. (2011) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2732-x · Cited by 34
Causal inference and temporal predictions in audiovisual perception of speech and music
Noppeney, U., & Lee, H. L. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13615 · Cited by 33
Bosen, A. K., Fleming, J. T., Allen, P. D., O‘Neill, W. E., & Paige, G. D. (2016) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4820-4 · Cited by 30
If MaxEnt RL is the Answer, What is the Question?Preprint
Eysenbach, B., & Levine, S. (2019) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01913 · Cited by 66
Accuracy-Precision Trade-off in Human Sound Localisation
Ege, R., Opstal, A. J. V., & van Wanrooij, M. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34512-6 · Cited by 31
A Bayesian Observer Replicates Convexity Context Effects in Figure–Ground Perception
Goldreich, D., & Peterson, M. A. (2012) · Seeing and Perceiving · doi:10.1163/187847612x634445 · Cited by 29
Complex Probabilistic Inference
Gershman, S. J., & Beck, J. M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119159193.ch33 · Cited by 30
Craig, A. B., Phillips, M. E., Zaldivar, A., Bhattacharyya, R., & Krichmar, J. L. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00017 · Cited by 29
Characterizing the Impact of Category Uncertainty on Human Auditory Categorization Behavior
Gifford, A. M., Cohen, Y. E., & Stocker, A. A. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003715 · Cited by 28
Bayesian decision theory and navigation
McNamara, T. P., & Chen, X. (2021) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01988-9 · Cited by 28
Multiple time scales of the ventriloquism aftereffect
Bosen, A. K., Fleming, J. T., Allen, P. D., O’Neill, W. E., & Paige, G. D. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200930 · Cited by 28
Bayesian Cue Integration as a Developmental Outcome of Reward Mediated Learning
Weisswange, T. H., Rothkopf, C. A., Rodemann, T., & Triesch, J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021575 · Cited by 29
Monkeys and humans implement causal inference to simultaneously localize auditory and visual stimuli
Mohl, J. T., Pearson, J. M., & Groh, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00046.2020 · Cited by 30
Goel, S., Jara‐Ettinger, J., Ong, D. C., & Gendron, M. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46670-5 · Cited by 32
Using the past to estimate sensory uncertainty
Beierholm, U., Rohe, T., Ferrari, A., Stegle, O., & Noppeney, U. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54172 · Cited by 31
Development of a Bayesian Estimator for Audio-Visual Integration: A Neurocomputational Study
Ursino, M., Crisafulli, A., di Pellegrino, G., Magosso, E., & Cuppini, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2017.00089 · Cited by 25
Towards characterizing the canonical computations generating phenomenal experience
Peters, M. A. K. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104903 · Cited by 25
Online learning of symbolic concepts
Thaker, P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2017) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2017.01.002 · Cited by 24
Hallum, L. E., & Dakin, S. C. (2021) · Translational Vision Science & Technology · doi:10.1167/tvst.10.10.8 · Cited by 21
Computational models of multisensory integration
Meijer, D., & Noppeney, U. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-812492-5.00005-x · Cited by 25
Park, H., Nannt, J., & Kayser, C. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.12.001 · Cited by 23
Modeling the Perception of Audiovisual Distance: Bayesian Causal Inference and Other Models
Mendonça, C., Mandelli, P., & Pulkki, V. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165391 · Cited by 24
The Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119170174.epcn216 · Cited by 23
Hong, F., Badde, S., & Landy, M. S. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008877 · Cited by 23
Bertoni, T., Mastria, G., Akulenko, N., Perrin, H., Zbinden, B., Bassolino, M., & Serino, A. (2023) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.06.019 · Cited by 24
Debats, N. B., & Heuer, H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28251-x · Cited by 23
Posterior Probability Matching and Human Perceptual Decision Making
Murray, R. F., Patel, K. Y., & Yee, A. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004342 · Cited by 21
The Adaptive Markets Hypothesis
Lo, A. W., & Zhang, R. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199681143.001.0001 · Cited by 23
Fractional Neural Sampling: A Theory of Spatiotemporal Probabilistic Computations in Neural Circuits
Qi, Y., & Gong, P. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32279-z · Cited by 20
Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion
Noel, J., Bill, J., Ding, H., Vastola, J. J., DeAngelis, G. C., Angelaki, D. E., & Drugowitsch, J. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0344 · Cited by 20
Feedback Modulates Audio-Visual Spatial Recalibration
Kramer, A., Röder, B., & Bruns, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnint.2019.00074 · Cited by 21
Neural dynamics of causal inference in the macaque frontoparietal circuit
Qi, G., Fang, W., Li, S., Li, J., & Wang, L. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.76145 · Cited by 18
Functional brain networks for learning predictive statistics
Giorgio, J., Karlaftis, V. M., Wang, R., Shen, Y., Peter Tiňo, B., Welchman, A. E., & Kourtzi, Z. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.014 · Cited by 18
Adversity magnifies the importance of social information in decision-making
Pérez‐Escudero, A., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2017) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2017.0748 · Cited by 19
Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception
Crane, B. T. (2017) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00037.2017 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Wozny, D. R., Beierholm, U. R., & Shams, L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Shams, Ladan
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-08-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e1000871
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- PMC
- PMC2916852
- OpenAlex
- W2067064274
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- probability matching, perceptual decision making, causal inference, model selection, weighted averaging, suboptimal strategies, cross-modal integration, perceptual inference
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Female, Humans, Male, Probability Learning, Sound Localization, Visual Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
