Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Google Goes Cancer: Improving Outcome Prediction for Cancer Patients by Network-Based Ranking of Marker Genes

Open access
Winter, Christof, Kristiansen, Glen, Kersting, Stephan, Roy, Janine, Aust, Daniela, Knösel, Thomas, Rümmele, Petra, Jahnke, Beatrix, Hentrich, Vera, Rückert, Felix, Niedergethmann, Marco, Weichert, Wilko, Bahra, Marcus, Schlitt, Hans J., Settmacher, Utz, Friess, Helmut, Büchler, Markus, Saeger, Hans-Detlev, Schroeder, Michael, Pilarsky, Christian, Grützmann, Robert·2012·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Predicting the clinical outcome of cancer patients based on the expression of marker genes in their tumors has received increasing interest in the past decade. Accurate predictors of outcome and response to therapy could be used to personalize and thereby improve therapy. However, state of the art methods used so far often found marker genes with limited prediction accuracy, limited reproducibility, and unclear biological relevance. To address this problem, we developed a novel computational approach to identify genes prognostic for outcome that couples gene expression measurements from primary tumor samples with a network of known relationships between the genes. Our approach ranks genes according to their prognostic relevance using both expression and network information in a manner similar to Google's PageRank. We applied this method to gene expression profiles which we obtained from 30 patients with pancreatic cancer, and identified seven candidate marker genes prognostic for outcome. Compared to genes found with state of the art methods, such as Pearson correlation of gene expression with survival time, we improve the prediction accuracy by up to 7%. Accuracies were assessed using support vector machine classifiers and Monte Carlo cross-validation. We then validated the prognostic value of our seven candidate markers using immunohistochemistry on an independent set of 412 pancreatic cancer samples. Notably, signatures derived from our candidate markers were independently predictive of outcome and superior to established clinical prognostic factors such as grade, tumor size, and nodal status. As the amount of genomic data of individual tumors grows rapidly, our algorithm meets the need for powerful computational approaches that are key to exploit these data for personalized cancer therapies in clinical practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002511

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Winter, C., Kristiansen, G., Kersting, S., Roy, J., Aust, D., Knösel, T., Rümmele, P., Jahnke, B., Hentrich, V., Rückert, F., Niedergethmann, M., Weichert, W., Bahra, M., Schlitt, H. J., Settmacher, U., Friess, H., Büchler, M., Saeger, H.-D., Schroeder, M., Pilarsky, C., & Grützmann, R.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2012-05-17
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
e1002511
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W1965302838
Cited by
210
References
7
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Google Goes Cancer: Improving Outcome Prediction for Cancer Patients by Network-Based Ranking of Marker Genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002511
The paper
Winter, C., Kristiansen, G., Kersting, S., Roy, J., Aust, D., Knösel, T., Rümmele, P., Jahnke, B., Hentrich, V., Rückert, F., Niedergethmann, M., Weichert, W., Bahra, M., Schlitt, H. J., Settmacher, U., Friess, H., Büchler, M., Saeger, H.-D., Schroeder, M., . . . Grützmann, R. (2012). Google Goes Cancer: Improving Outcome Prediction for Cancer Patients by Network-Based Ranking of Marker Genes. PLoS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002511

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.