Cited by 49Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisScientific Computing and Data ManagementModeling and Simulation Systems

A reappraisal of how to build modular, reusable models of biological systems.

Open access
Neal, Maxwell L., Cooling, Michael T., Smith, Lucian P., Thompson, Christopher T., Sauro, Herbert M., Carlson, Brian E., Cook, Daniel L., Gennari, John H.·2014·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

Biological researchers increasingly rely on computational models to integrate biological systems knowledge, test hypotheses, and forecast system behavior.The expanding size of these models requires solutions for managing their complexity.Modularity, a time-tested design principle for managing complexity, can be applied within the biological modeling field to parallelize work, automate composition, and promote effective model sharing.As modelers of complex biological systems, we aim to apply modular production to accelerate our efforts and have therefore investigated several currently available approaches for modular modeling.We argue that some traditional features of modularity, in particular the isolation of a module's contents from the rest of the system, can impede model sharing and composition when applied within the context of biological simulation.Alternative approaches that can automatically interface model components based on the biological meaning of their contents (their semantics) avoid these limitations.Our conclusions have strategic implications for the design of systems biology, synthetic biology, and integrated physiological modeling technologies, as well as communitylevel model curation efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003849

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neal, M. L., Cooling, M. T., Smith, L. P., Thompson, C. T., Sauro, H. M., Carlson, B. E., Cook, D. L., & Gennari, J. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Neal, Maxwell L.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2014-10-02
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
e1003849
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W2016462601
Cited by
49
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • American Heart Association
  • Royal Society
  • European Commission (248502)
  • Royal Society Te Apārangi (UOA1007)
  • Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery
  • National Institutes of Health (GM094503)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R42HG006737, R42-HG006737-03)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01-GM081070-06, P50GM094503, P50-GM094503-03, R01GM081070)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007442)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation Systems
Keywords
modular modeling, biological models, model reuse, model composition, model sharing, semantic interface, model curation, systems biology, synthetic biology, physiological modeling, model complexity
MeSH terms
Models, Biological, Software, Systems Biology, Metabolic Networks and Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review