Cited by 72Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

A blueprint for human whole-cell modeling

Open access
Szigeti, Balázs, Roth, Yosef D., Sekar, John A.P., Goldberg, Arthur P., Pochiraju, Saahith C., Karr, Jonathan R.·2018·Current Opinion in Systems Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Whole-cell dynamical models of human cells are a central goal of systems biology. Such models could help researchers understand cell biology and help physicians treat disease. Despite significant challenges, we believe that human whole-cell models are rapidly becoming feasible. To develop a plan for achieving human whole-cell models, we analyzed the existing models of individual cellular pathways, surveyed the biomodeling community, and reflected on our experience developing whole-cell models of bacteria. Based on these analyses, we propose a plan for a project, termed the Human Whole-Cell Modeling Project, to achieve human whole-cell models. The foundations of the plan include technology development, standards development, and interdisciplinary collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.coisb.2017.10.005

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BioModels is the world's largest repository of curated models and the third most used data resource after PubMed and Google Scholar among scientists who use modelling in their research.

    “BioModels is the world’s largest repository of curated models and is the third most used data resource after PubMed and Google Scholar among the scientists who use modelling in their research (Stanford et al., 2015; Szigeti et al., 2018).”

    From BioModels Parameters: a treasure trove of parameter values from published systems biology models (2020) · cites this paper as Szigeti et al., 2018

    The “Incompatible models” section identifies BioModels as a model repository. It does not say that BioModels is the world’s largest repository of curated models or rank its use against PubMed and Google Scholar; searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy. No page number was available. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [45]Barnes PD Jr Carothers CD Jefferson DR LaPre JM Warp speed: executing time warp on 1,966,080 cores Proc 1st ACM SIGSIM Conf Princip Adv Discret Simul 2013 327 336

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szigeti, B., Roth, Y. D., Sekar, J. A. P., Goldberg, A. P., Pochiraju, S. C., & Karr, J. R.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Karr, Jonathan R.
Venue
Current Opinion in Systems Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
7
Pages
8-15
ISSN
2452-3100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2952117952
Cited by
72
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Systems Biology (acceptedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1 R35 GM 119771-01, 1649014)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
whole-cell modeling, human cells, systems biology, interdisciplinary collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review