The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Membraneless organelles important to intracellular compartmentalization have recently been shown to comprise assemblies of proteins which undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). However, many proteins involved in this phase separation are at least partially disordered. The molecular mechanism and the sequence determinants of this process are challenging to determine experimentally owing to the disordered nature of the assemblies, motivating the use of theoretical and simulation methods. This work advances a computational framework for conducting simulations of LLPS with residue-level detail, and allows for the determination of phase diagrams and coexistence densities of proteins in the two phases. The model includes a short-range contact potential as well as a simplified treatment of electrostatic energy. Interaction parameters are optimized against experimentally determined radius of gyration data for multiple unfolded or intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). These models are applied to two systems which undergo LLPS: the low complexity domain of the RNA-binding protein FUS and the DEAD-box helicase protein LAF-1. We develop a novel simulation method to determine thermodynamic phase diagrams as a function of the total protein concentration and temperature. We show that the model is capable of capturing qualitative changes in the phase diagram due to phosphomimetic mutations of FUS and to the presence or absence of the large folded domain in LAF-1. We also explore the effects of chain-length, or multivalency, on the phase diagram, and obtain results consistent with Flory-Huggins theory for polymers. Most importantly, the methodology presented here is flexible so that it can be easily extended to other pair potentials, be used with other enhanced sampling methods, and may incorporate additional features for biological systems of interest. Author summary Liquid liquid phase separation (LLPS) of low-complexity protein sequences has emerged as an important research topic due to its relevance to membraneless organelles and intracellular compartmentalization. However a molecular level understanding of LLPS cannot be easily obtained by experimental methods due to difficulty of determining structural properties of phase separated protein assemblies, and of choosing appropriate mutations. Here we advance a coarse-grained computational framework for accessing the long time scale phase separation process and for obtaining molecular details of LLPS, in conjunction with state of the art enhanced sampling methods. We are able to capture qualitatively the changes of phase diagram due to specific mutations, inclusion of a folded domain, and to variation of chain length. The model is flexible and can be used with different knowledge-based potential energy functions, as we demonstrate. We expect a wide application of the presented framework for advancing our understanding of the formation of liquid-like protein assemblies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Kato, M., Han, T. W., Xie, S., Shi, K., Du, X., Wu, L. C., Mirzaei, H., Goldsmith, E. J., Longgood, J., Pei, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017 · Cited by 2,012
How fast-folding proteins fold
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208351 · Cited by 1,980
Reversible compartmentalization of de novo purine biosynthetic complexes in living cells
An, S., Kumar, R., Sheets, E. D., & Benkovic, S. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152241 · Cited by 585
Cited by
Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A., & Mittag, T. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035 · Cited by 2,856
Abyzov, A., Blackledge, M., & Zweckstetter, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00774 · Cited by 215
Advances in coarse-grained modeling of macromolecular complexes
Pak, A. J., & Voth, G. A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2018.11.005 · Cited by 145
Making the Case for Disordered Proteins and Biomolecular Condensates in Bacteria
Cohan, M. C., & Pappu, R. V. (2020) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.04.011 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Dignon, G. L., Zheng, W., Kim, Y. C., Best, R. B., & Mittal, J.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1005941
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2784384705
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005941
- The paper
- Dignon, G. L., Zheng, W., Kim, Y. C., Best, R. B., & Mittal, J. (2018). Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model. PLOS Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.