The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sequence determinants of protein phase behavior from a coarse-grained model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Membraneless organelles important to intracellular compartmentalization have recently been shown to comprise assemblies of proteins which undergo liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS). However, many proteins involved in this phase separation are at least partially disordered. The molecular mechanism and the sequence determinants of this process are challenging to determine experimentally owing to the disordered nature of the assemblies, motivating the use of theoretical and simulation methods. This work advances a computational framework for conducting simulations of LLPS with residue-level detail, and allows for the determination of phase diagrams and coexistence densities of proteins in the two phases. The model includes a short-range contact potential as well as a simplified treatment of electrostatic energy. Interaction parameters are optimized against experimentally determined radius of gyration data for multiple unfolded or intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). These models are applied to two systems which undergo LLPS: the low complexity domain of the RNA-binding protein FUS and the DEAD-box helicase protein LAF-1. We develop a novel simulation method to determine thermodynamic phase diagrams as a function of the total protein concentration and temperature. We show that the model is capable of capturing qualitative changes in the phase diagram due to phosphomimetic mutations of FUS and to the presence or absence of the large folded domain in LAF-1. We also explore the effects of chain-length, or multivalency, on the phase diagram, and obtain results consistent with Flory-Huggins theory for polymers. Most importantly, the methodology presented here is flexible so that it can be easily extended to other pair potentials, be used with other enhanced sampling methods, and may incorporate additional features for biological systems of interest. Author summary Liquid liquid phase separation (LLPS) of low-complexity protein sequences has emerged as an important research topic due to its relevance to membraneless organelles and intracellular compartmentalization. However a molecular level understanding of LLPS cannot be easily obtained by experimental methods due to difficulty of determining structural properties of phase separated protein assemblies, and of choosing appropriate mutations. Here we advance a coarse-grained computational framework for accessing the long time scale phase separation process and for obtaining molecular details of LLPS, in conjunction with state of the art enhanced sampling methods. We are able to capture qualitatively the changes of phase diagram due to specific mutations, inclusion of a folded domain, and to variation of chain length. The model is flexible and can be used with different knowledge-based potential energy functions, as we demonstrate. We expect a wide application of the presented framework for advancing our understanding of the formation of liquid-like protein assemblies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Kato, M., Han, T. W., Xie, S., Shi, K., Du, X., Wu, L. C., Mirzaei, H., Goldsmith, E. J., Longgood, J., Pei, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017 · Cited by 2,012
How fast-folding proteins fold
Lindorff-Larsen, K., Piana, S., Dror, R. O., & Shaw, D. E. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208351 · Cited by 1,980
Reversible compartmentalization of de novo purine biosynthetic complexes in living cells
An, S., Kumar, R., Sheets, E. D., & Benkovic, S. J. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152241 · Cited by 585
Cited by
Alberti, S., Gladfelter, A., & Mittag, T. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035 · Cited by 2,856
Abyzov, A., Blackledge, M., & Zweckstetter, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00774 · Cited by 215
Advances in coarse-grained modeling of macromolecular complexes
Pak, A. J., & Voth, G. A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2018.11.005 · Cited by 145
Making the Case for Disordered Proteins and Biomolecular Condensates in Bacteria
Cohan, M. C., & Pappu, R. V. (2020) · Trends in Biochemical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2020.04.011 · Cited by 104
Binding without folding – the biomolecular function of disordered polyelectrolyte complexes
Schuler, B., Borgia, A., Borgia, M. B., Heidarsson, P. O., Holmstrom, E. D., Nettels, D., & Sottini, A. (2020) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.006 · Cited by 91
Lindorff-Larsen, K., & Kragelund, B. B. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167196 · Cited by 85
Rational optimization of a transcription factor activation domain inhibitor
Basu, S., Martínez-Cristóbal, P., Frigolé-Vivas, M., Pesarrodona, M., Lewis, M., Szulc, E., Bañuelos, C. A., Sánchez-Zarzalejo, C., Bielskutė, S., Zhu, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01159-5 · Cited by 83
“According to theory 47 , coarse-grained simulations 48 and experiments 49 , this decreases the minimal concentration needed for phase separation.”
Minimal coarse-grained models for molecular self-organisation in biology
Hafner, A. E., Krausser, J., & Šarić, A. (2019) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2019.05.018 · Cited by 58
Fluorescent protein and peptide tags alter condensate formation and dynamics in vivo and in vitro
Dörner, K., Gut, M. J., Overwijn, D., Cao, F., Siketanc, M., Heinrich, S., Beuret, N., Meyer, J., Sharpe, T., Lindorff-Larsen, K., et al. (2026) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-025-00626-y · Cited by 45
A cyclin-dependent kinase-mediated phosphorylation switch of disordered protein condensation
Valverde, J. M., Dubra, G., Phillips, M., Haider, A., Elena-Real, C., Fournet, A., Alghoul, E., Chahar, D., Andrés-Sanchez, N., Paloni, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42049-0 · Cited by 33
The Chromatin Regulator HMGA1a Undergoes Phase Separation in the Nucleus**
Zhu, H., Narita, M., Joseph, J. A., Krainer, G., Arter, W. E., Olan, I., Saar, K. L., Ermann, N., Espinosa, J. R., Shen, Y., et al. (2023) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202200450 · Cited by 23
Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold
Schnapka, V., Morozova, T. I., Sen, S., & Bonomi, M. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69172-y · Cited by 23
Predicting Heteropolymer Interactions: Demixing and Hypermixing of Disordered Protein Sequences
Adachi, K., & Kawaguchi, K. (2024) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.031011 · Cited by 19
Chao, T.-H., Rekhi, S., Mittal, J., & Tabor, D. P. (2023) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/d3me00053b · Cited by 14
Self-citationBhattacharjee, R., Hall, A. R., Mangione, M. C., Igarashi, M. G., Roberts-Galbraith, R. H., Chen, J.-S., Vavylonis, D., & Gould, K. L. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.83062 · Cited by 12
Multi- e GO: Model Improvements toward the Study of Complex Self-Assembly Processes
Bačić Toplek, F., Scalone, E., Stegani, B., Paissoni, C., Capelli, R., & Camilloni, C. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01182 · Cited by 12
Fused in sarcoma undergoes cold denaturation: Implications for phase separation
Félix, S. S., Laurents, D. V., Oroz, J., & Cabrita, E. J. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4521 · Cited by 12
Baratam, K., & Srivastava, A. (2024) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00579 · Cited by 9
Multi-scale simulations of MUT-16 scaffold protein phase separation and client recognition
Gaurav, K., Busetto, V., Páez-Moscoso, D. J., Changiarath, A., Hanson, S. M., Falk, S., Ketting, R. F., & Stelzl, L. S. (2025) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2025.08.001 · Cited by 7
Protein language model identifies disordered, conserved motifs implicated in phase separation
Zhang, Y., Zheng, J., & Zhang, B. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.105309 · Cited by 4
“…; Pappu et al., 2023 ; Zeng and Pappu, 2023 ; Schmit et al., 2020 ; Mittag and Pappu, 2022 ; Dzuricky et al., 2018 ; Flory, 1942 ; Huggins, 1942 ; Dignon et al., 2018 ; Dignon et al., 2019 ; Latham and Zhang, 2020 ; Joseph et al., 2021 ; Regy et al., 2021 ; Latham and Zhang, 2021 ; Tesei et al.,…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Dignon, G. L., Zheng, W., Kim, Y. C., Best, R. B., & Mittal, J.
- Venue
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1005941
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2784384705
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.