Cited by 17Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Estimation of regional polygenicity from GWAS provides insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits

Open access
Johnson, Ruth, Burch, Kathryn S., Hou, Kangcheng, Paciuc, Mario, Pasaniuc, Bogdan, Sankararaman, Sriram·2021·PLoS Computational Biology

Abstract

The number of variants that have a non-zero effect on a trait (i.e. polygenicity) is a fundamental parameter in the study of the genetic architecture of a complex trait. Although many previous studies have investigated polygenicity at a genome-wide scale, a detailed understanding of how polygenicity varies across genomic regions is currently lacking. In this work, we propose an accurate and scalable statistical framework to estimate regional polygenicity for a complex trait. We show that our approach yields approximately unbiased estimates of regional polygenicity in simulations across a wide-range of various genetic architectures. We then partition the polygenicity of anthropometric and blood pressure traits across 6-Mb genomic regions (N = 290K, UK Biobank) and observe that all analyzed traits are highly polygenic: over one-third of regions harbor at least one causal variant for each of the traits analyzed. Additionally, we observe wide variation in regional polygenicity: on average across all traits, 48.9% of regions contain at least 5 causal SNPs, 5.44% of regions contain at least 50 causal SNPs. Finally, we find that heritability is proportional to polygenicity at the regional level, which is consistent with the hypothesis that heritability enrichments are largely driven by the variation in the number of causal SNPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009483

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, R., Burch, K. S., Hou, K., Paciuc, M., Pasaniuc, B., & Sankararaman, S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Johnson, Ruth
  • Sankararaman, Sriram
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
e1009483
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W3205440668
Cited by
16
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (DGE-1829071, III-1705121)
  • National Institutes of Health (R35GM125055)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2017-9480)
  • Okawa Foundation for Information and Telecommunications
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG009120, R01HG006399)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA194393)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
genetic architecture, complex traits, causal variants, heritability enrichment, anthropometric traits, blood pressure, genomic regions, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Blood Pressure, Humans, Genome, Human, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review