Cited by 91Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Accurate estimation of SNP-heritability from biobank-scale data irrespective of genetic architecture

Open access
Hou, Kangcheng, Burch, Kathryn S., Majumdar, Arunabha, Shi, Huwenbo, Mancuso, Nicholas, Wu, Yue, Sankararaman, Sriram, Pasaniuc, Bogdan·2019·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

SNP-heritability is a fundamental quantity in the study of complex traits. Recent studies have shown that existing methods to estimate genome-wide SNP-heritability can yield biases when their assumptions are violated. While various approaches have been proposed to account for frequency- and linkage disequilibrium (LD)-dependent genetic architectures, it remains unclear which estimates reported in the literature are reliable. Here we show that genome-wide SNP-heritability can be accurately estimated from biobank-scale data irrespective of genetic architecture, without specifying a heritability model or partitioning SNPs by allele frequency and/or LD. We show analytically and through extensive simulations starting from real genotypes (UK Biobank, N = 337 K) that, unlike existing methods, our closed-form estimator is robust across a wide range of architectures. We provide estimates of SNP-heritability for 22 complex traits in the UK Biobank and show that, consistent with our results in simulations, existing biobank-scale methods yield estimates up to 30% different from our theoretically-justified approach.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-019-0465-0

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent analyses have demonstrated that estimates of heritability enrichment are sensitive to the assumed heritability model and that variation in heritability estimates from different statistical methods are influenced by demographic factors.

    “Fourth, recent analyses have demonstrated that estimates of heritability enrichment are sensitive to the assumed heritability model and that variation in heritability estimates from different statistical methods are influenced by demographic factors75,76.”

    From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [76]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hou, K., Burch, K. S., Majumdar, A., Shi, H., Mancuso, N., Wu, Y., Sankararaman, S., & Pasaniuc, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Burch, Kathryn S.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2019-07-29
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
1244-1251
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2966861845
Cited by
91
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (33127)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_PC_17228)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH073526, R01MH115676)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG009120, R01HG006399, T32HG002536)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA194393)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM125055)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32NS048004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
SNP heritability, heritability estimation, genetic architecture, linkage disequilibrium, allele frequency, complex traits, biobank-scale data, closed-form estimator, UK Biobank
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Phenotype, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Biological Specimen Banks, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review