Cited by 44Neural dynamics and brain functionEmbodied and Extended CognitionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Predictive coding networks for temporal prediction

Open access
Millidge, Beren, Tang, Mufeng, Osanlouy, Mahyar, Harper, Nicol S., Bogacz, Rafal·2024·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

One of the key problems the brain faces is inferring the state of the world from a sequence of dynamically changing stimuli, and it is not yet clear how the sensory system achieves this task. A well-established computational framework for describing perceptual processes in the brain is provided by the theory of predictive coding. Although the original proposals of predictive coding have discussed temporal prediction, later work developing this theory mostly focused on static stimuli, and key questions on neural implementation and computational properties of temporal predictive coding networks remain open. Here, we address these questions and present a formulation of the temporal predictive coding model that can be naturally implemented in recurrent networks, in which activity dynamics rely only on local inputs to the neurons, and learning only utilises local Hebbian plasticity. Additionally, we show that temporal predictive coding networks can approximate the performance of the Kalman filter in predicting behaviour of linear systems, and behave as a variant of a Kalman filter which does not track its own subjective posterior variance. Importantly, temporal predictive coding networks can achieve similar accuracy as the Kalman filter without performing complex mathematical operations, but just employing simple computations that can be implemented by biological networks. Moreover, when trained with natural dynamic inputs, we found that temporal predictive coding can produce Gabor-like, motion-sensitive receptive fields resembling those observed in real neurons in visual areas. In addition, we demonstrate how the model can be effectively generalized to nonlinear systems. Overall, models presented in this paper show how biologically plausible circuits can predict future stimuli and may guide research on understanding specific neural circuits in brain areas involved in temporal prediction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011183

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Predictive coding models consider hierarchies in which higher levels affect the mean of lower levels and are typically used to model inference about static sensory inputs in continuous time.

    “This is partly due to their non-overlapping applications: predictive coding models consider hierarchies in which higher levels affect the mean of lower levels, and they are typically used to model inference about static sensory inputs in continuous time (for a recent extension to dynamic inputs, see Millidge et al., 2024).”

    From The generalized Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (2026) · cites this paper as Millidge et al., 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. [2]Srinivasan MV, Laughlin SB, Dubs A. Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences. 1982; 216(1205): 427– 459. 6129637
  2. [3]Mumford D. On the computational architecture of the neocortex. Biological cybernetics. 1992; 66(3): 241– 251. doi: 10.1007/BF00198477 1540675 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological sciences. 2005; 360(1456): 815– 836. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 15937014 PMC1569488 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6]Clark A. Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press; 2015. Available from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TnqECgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=andy+clark+surfing+uncertainty&ots=aurm6iDbJR&sig=A5uoJIteAk4JDCEpnQaa2KAbfg4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=andy
  5. [7]Friston K. Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks. 2003; 16(9): 1325– 1352. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2003.06.005 14622888 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]Buckley CL, Kim CS, McGregor S, Seth AK. The free energy principle for action and perception: A mathematical review. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 2017; 81: 55– 79. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.004 · DOI
  7. [9]Bogacz R. A tutorial on the free-energy framework for modelling perception and learning. Journal of mathematical psychology. 2017; 76: 198– 211. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.11.003 28298703 PMC5341759 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [10]Millidge B, Tschantz A, Seth A, Buckley CL. Relaxing the constraints on predictive coding models. arXiv preprint arXiv:201001047. 2020;.
  9. [12]Auksztulewicz R, Friston K. Repetition suppression and its contextual determinants in predictive coding. cortex. 2016; 80: 125– 140. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.024 26861557 PMC5405056 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Hohwy J, Roepstorff A, Friston K. Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review. Cognition. 2008; 108(3): 687– 701. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.010 18649876 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [16]Millidge B, Shillcock R. Fixational Eye Movements: Data Augmentation for the Brain? PsyArXiv. 2019;.
  12. [17]Feldman H, Friston K. Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2010; 4: 215. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215 21160551 PMC3001758 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [18]Kanai R, Komura Y, Shipp S, Friston K. Cerebral hierarchies: predictive processing, precision and the pulvinar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2015; 370(1668): 20140169. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0169 25823866 PMC4387510 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [21]Millidge B, Seth A, Buckley CL. Predictive Coding: a Theoretical and Experimental Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:210712979. 2021;.
  15. [22]Song Y, Lukasiewicz T, Xu Z, Bogacz R. Can the Brain Do Backpropagation?—Exact Implementation of Backpropagation in Predictive Coding Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2020; 33. 33840988 PMC7610561
  16. [24]Ororbia A, Kifer D. The neural coding framework for learning generative models. Nature communications. 2022; 13(1): 1– 14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29632-7 35440589 PMC9018730 · DOI
  17. [26]Whittington JC, Bogacz R. An approximation of the error backpropagation algorithm in a predictive coding network with local hebbian synaptic plasticity. Neural computation. 2017; 29(5): 1229– 1262. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00949 28333583 PMC5467749 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [27]Kalman RE. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Engineering. 1960; 82(1): 35– 45. doi: 10.1115/1.3662552 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [29]Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural computation. 1997; 9(8): 1735– 1780. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 9377276 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [30]Williams RJ, Zipser D. A learning algorithm for continually running fully recurrent neural networks. Neural computation. 1989; 1(2): 270– 280. doi: 10.1162/neco.1989.1.2.270 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [31]Williams RJ. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning. 1992; 8(3-4): 229– 256. doi: 10.1007/BF00992696 · DOI
  22. [32]Werbos PJ. Generalization of backpropagation with application to a recurrent gas market model. Neural networks. 1988; 1(4): 339– 356. doi: 10.1016/0893-6080(88)90007-X · DOI
  23. [33]Rao RP. Correlates of attention in a model of dynamic visual recognition. Advances in neural information processing systems. 1997; 10.
  24. [34]Rao RP, Ballard DH. Dynamic model of visual recognition predicts neural response properties in the visual cortex. Neural computation. 1997; 9(4): 721– 763. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.4.721 9161021 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [38]Kutschireiter A, Surace SC, Sprekeler H, Pfister JP. Nonlinear Bayesian filtering and learning: a neuronal dynamics for perception. Scientific reports. 2017; 7(1): 1– 13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06519-y 28821729 PMC5562918 · DOI
  26. [39]Ororbia A, Mali A, Giles CL, Kifer D. Continual learning of recurrent neural networks by locally aligning distributed representations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. 2020;. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2953622 31976910 · DOI
  27. [40]Jiang LP, Rao RP. Dynamic Predictive Coding: A New Model of Hierarchical Sequence Learning and Prediction in the Cortex. bioRxiv. 2022;. PMC10880975 38330098
  28. [41]Baker CL. Spatial-and temporal-frequency selectivity as a basis for velocity preference in cat striate cortex neurons. Visual neuroscience. 1990; 4(2): 101– 113. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800002273 2271442 · DOI
  29. [44]Friston K, Ao P. Free energy, value, and attractors. Computational and mathematical methods in medicine. 2012; 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/937860 22229042 PMC3249597 · DOI
  30. [45]Neal RM, Hinton GE. A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In: Learning in graphical models. Springer; 1998. p. 355– 368.
  31. [47]Ghahramani Z, Beal MJ, et al. Graphical models and variational methods. Advanced mean field methods-theory and practice. MIT Press; 2000.
  32. [48]Tang M, Salvatori T, Millidge B, Song Y, Lukasiewicz T, Bogacz R. Recurrent predictive coding models for associative memory employing covariance learning. PLOS Computational Biology. 2023; 19(4): e1010719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010719 37058541 PMC10132551 · DOI
  33. [49]Sacramento J, Costa RP, Bengio Y, Senn W. Dendritic cortical microcircuits approximate the backpropagation algorithm. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2018. p. 8721– 8732.
  34. [51]Rainer G, Asaad WF, Miller EK. Selective representation of relevant information by neurons in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature. 1998; 393(6685): 577– 579. doi: 10.1038/31235 9634233 · DOI
  35. [53]Stengel RF. Stochastic optimal control: theory and application. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1986.
  36. [54]Chen Z, et al. Bayesian filtering: From Kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond. Statistics. 2003; 182(1): 1– 69. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2012.708030 · DOI
  37. [55]Bishop CM, Nasrabadi NM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. vol. 4. Springer; 2006.
  38. [57]Millidge B, Tschantz A, Seth A, Buckley C. Neural Kalman Filtering. arXiv preprint arXiv:210210021. 2021;.
  39. [58]Baltieri M, Isomura T. Kalman filters as the steady-state solution of gradient descent on variational free energy. arXiv preprint arXiv:211110530. 2021;.
  40. [59]Ruck DW, Rogers SK, Kabrisky M, Maybeck PS, Oxley ME. Comparative analysis of backpropagation and the extended Kalman filter for training multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence. 1992;(6): 686– 691. doi: 10.1109/34.141559 · DOI
  41. [60]Olshausen BA, Field DJ. Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? Vision research. 1997; 37(23): 3311– 3325. 9425546
  42. [61]Singer Y, Teramoto Y, Willmore BD, Schnupp JW, King AJ, Harper NS. Sensory cortex is optimized for prediction of future input. elife. 2018; 7: e31557. doi: 10.7554/eLife.31557 29911971 PMC6108826 · DOI
  43. [62]Singer Y, Taylor L, Willmore BD, King AJ, Harper NS. Hierarchical temporal prediction captures motion processing along the visual pathway. Elife. 2023; 12: e52599. doi: 10.7554/eLife.52599 37844199 PMC10629830 · DOI
  44. [63]Nowak LG, Azouz R, Sanchez-Vives MV, Gray CM, McCormick DA. Electrophysiological classes of cat primary visual cortical neurons in vivo as revealed by quantitative analyses. Journal of neurophysiology. 2003; 89(3): 1541– 1566. doi: 10.1152/jn.00580.2002 12626627 · DOI
  45. [64]Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. The Journal of physiology. 1962; 160(1): 106. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 14449617 PMC1359523 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [65]Dayan P, Abbott LF. Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. MIT press; 2005.
  47. [66]Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat’s visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 1996; 75(5): 1779– 1805. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1779 8734580 · DOI
  48. [67]Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience. 1987; 7(11): 3416– 3468. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-11-03416.1987 3316524 PMC6569044 · DOI
  49. [68]Bogacz R, Brown M, Giraud-Carrier C. Emergence of movement sensitive neurons' properties by learning a sparse code for natural moving images. Advances in neural information processing systems. 2000; 13.
  50. [69]Olshausen BA. Sparse coding of time-varying natural images. Journal of Vision. 2002; 2(7): 130– 130. doi: 10.1167/2.7.130 · DOI
  51. [70]Doya K, Ishii S, Pouget A, Rao RP. Bayesian brain: Probabilistic approaches to neural coding. MIT press; 2007.
  52. [71]Wilson R, Finkel L. A neural implementation of the Kalman filter. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2009. p. 2062– 2070.
  53. [72]Deneve S, Duhamel JR, Pouget A. Optimal sensorimotor integration in recurrent cortical networks: a neural implementation of Kalman filters. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007; 27(21): 5744– 5756. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3985-06.2007 17522318 PMC6672763 · DOI
  54. [73]Beck J, Ma W, Latham P, Pouget A. Probabilistic population codes and the exponential family of distributions. Progress in brain research. 2007; 165: 509– 519. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)65032-2 17925267 · DOI
  55. [74]Bellec G, Scherr F, Subramoney A, Hajek E, Salaj D, Legenstein R, et al. A solution to the learning dilemma for recurrent networks of spiking neurons. bioRxiv. 2020; p. 738385. PMC7367848 32681001
  56. [75]Rao RP. An optimal estimation approach to visual perception and learning. Vision research. 1999; 39(11): 1963– 1989. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00279-X 10343783 · DOI
  57. [76]Lotter W, Kreiman G, Cox D. Deep predictive coding networks for video prediction and unsupervised learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:160508104. 2016;.
  58. [77]van Hateren JH, Ruderman DL. Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1998; 265(1412): 2315– 2320. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0577 9881476 PMC1689525 · DOI
  59. [78]Pachitariu M, Sahani M. Learning visual motion in recurrent neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2012; 25.
  60. [79]Pachitariu M, Sahani M. Visual motion computation in recurrent neural networks. bioRxiv. 2017; p. 099101.
  61. [80]Berkes P, Wiskott L. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. Journal of vision. 2005; 5(6): 9– 9. doi: 10.1167/5.6.9 16097870 · DOI
  62. [81]Hyvärinen A, Hurri J, Väyrynen J. Bubbles: a unifying framework for low-level statistical properties of natural image sequences. JOSA A. 2003; 20(7): 1237– 1252. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.20.001237 12868630 · DOI
  63. [83]Friedrich J, Golkar S, Farashahi S, Genkin A, Sengupta A, Chklovskii D. Neural optimal feedback control with local learning rules. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2021; 34: 16358– 16370.
  64. [84]Moeller M, Manohar S, Bogacz R. Uncertainty–guided learning with scaled prediction errors in the basal ganglia. PLoS computational biology. 2022; 18(5): e1009816. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009816 35622863 PMC9182698 · DOI
  65. [85]Navajas J, Hindocha C, Foda H, Keramati M, Latham PE, Bahrami B. The idiosyncratic nature of confidence. Nature human behaviour. 2017; 1(11): 810– 818. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0215-1 29152591 PMC5687567 · DOI
  66. [86]Daw ND, O'Doherty JP, Dayan P, Seymour B, Dolan RJ. Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature. 2006; 441(7095): 876– 879. doi: 10.1038/nature04766 16778890 PMC2635947 · DOI · Paper page
  67. [87]Howard-Jones PA, Bogacz R, Yoo JH, Leonards U, Demetriou S. The neural mechanisms of learning from competitors. Neuroimage. 2010; 53(2): 790– 799. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.027 20600992 · DOI
  68. [88]Ribeiro MI. Kalman and extended kalman filters: Concept, derivation and properties. Institute for Systems and Robotics. 2004; 43(46): 3736– 3741.
  69. [89]Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2004; 92(3): 401– 422. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2003.823141 · DOI
  70. [90]Friston K, Trujillo-Barreto N, Daunizeau J. DEM: a variational treatment of dynamic systems. Neuroimage. 2008; 41(3): 849– 885. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.054 18434205 · DOI · Paper page
  71. [91]Parr T, Friston KJ. The discrete and continuous brain: from decisions to movement—and back again. Neural computation. 2018; 30(9): 2319– 2347. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01102 29894658 PMC6115199 · DOI
  72. [92]Tschantz A, Millidge B, Seth AK, Buckley CL. Hybrid Predictive Coding: Inferring, Fast and Slow. arXiv preprint arXiv:220402169. 2022;. PMC10395865 37531366
  73. [93]Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C. Speed of processing in the human visual system. nature. 1996; 381(6582): 520– 522. doi: 10.1038/381520a0 8632824 · DOI · Paper page
  74. [94]Keysers C, Xiao DK, Földiák P, Perrett DI. The speed of sight. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 2001; 13(1): 90– 101. doi: 10.1162/089892901564199 11224911 · DOI
  75. [95]Carlson T, Tovar DA, Alink A, Kriegeskorte N. Representational dynamics of object vision: the first 1000 ms. Journal of vision. 2013; 13(10): 1– 1. doi: 10.1167/13.10.1 23908380 · DOI
  76. [96]Thunell E, Thorpe SJ. Memory for repeated images in rapid-serial-visual-presentation streams of thousands of images. Psychological science. 2019; 30(7): 989– 1000. doi: 10.1177/0956797619842251 31017834 · DOI
  77. [97]Buzsaki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. science. 2004; 304(5679): 1926– 1929. doi: 10.1126/science.1099745 15218136 · DOI · Paper page
  78. [98]Buzsaki G. Rhythms of the Brain. Oxford University Press; 2006.
  79. [99]Ruzzoli M, Torralba M, M Fernández L, Soto-Faraco S. The relevance of alpha phase in human perception. Cortex. 2019; 120: 249– 268. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.05.012 31352236 · DOI
  80. [100]Hochreiter S. The vanishing gradient problem during learning recurrent neural nets and problem solutions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems. 1998; 6(02): 107– 116. doi: 10.1142/S0218488598000094 · DOI · Paper page
  81. [101]Tallec C, Ollivier Y. Can recurrent neural networks warp time? arXiv preprint arXiv:180411188. 2018;.
  82. [102]Koutnik J, Greff K, Gomez F, Schmidhuber J. A clockwork rnn. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR; 2014. p. 1863–1871.
  83. [103]Guerguiev J, Lillicrap TP, Richards BA. Towards deep learning with segregated dendrites. Elife. 2017; 6: e22901. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22901 29205151 PMC5716677 · DOI
  84. [104]Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science. 1997; 275(5306): 1593– 1599. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 9054347 · DOI · Paper page
  85. [105]Schultz W. Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of neurophysiology. 1998; 80(1): 1– 27. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 9658025 · DOI · Paper page
  86. [106]Auksztulewicz R, Rajendran VG, Peng F, Schnupp JWH, Harper NS. Omission responses in local field potentials in rat auditory cortex. BMC biology. 2023; 21(1): 130. doi: 10.1186/s12915-023-01592-4 37254137 PMC10230691 · DOI
  87. [107]Mikulasch FA, Rudelt L, Wibral M, Priesemann V. Where is the error? Hierarchical predictive coding through dendritic error computation. Trends in Neurosciences. 2023; 46(1): 45– 59. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.09.007 36577388 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millidge, B., Tang, M., Osanlouy, M., Harper, N. S., & Bogacz, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2024-04-01
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
e1011183
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W4393392404
Cited by
44
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S006338/1)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00003/1)
  • Abraham Scholarship in the Chemical, Biological/Life and Medical Sciences
  • Wellcome Trust (WT108369/Z/2015/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
predictive coding, temporal prediction, recurrent neural networks, Hebbian plasticity, Kalman filter, linear dynamical systems, nonlinear systems, neural circuits, perceptual inference, naturalistic stimuli
MeSH terms
Brain, Learning, Models, Neurological, Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review