Cited by 15Protein Structure and DynamicsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMachine Learning in Bioinformatics

Computational design of novel Cas9 PAM-interacting domains using evolution-based modelling and structural quality assessment

Open access
Malbranke, Cyril, Rostain, William, Depardieu, Florence, Cocco, Simona, Monasson, Rémi, Bikard, David·2023·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present here an approach to protein design that combines (i) scarce functional information such as experimental data (ii) evolutionary information learned from a natural sequence variants and (iii) physics-grounded modeling. Using a Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), we learn a sequence model of a protein family. We use semi-supervision to leverage available functional information during the RBM training. We then propose a strategy to explore the protein representation space that can be informed by external models such as an empirical force-field method (FoldX). Our approach is applied to a domain of the Cas9 protein responsible for recognition of a short DNA motif. We experimentally assess the functionality of 71 variants generated to explore a range of RBM and FoldX energies. Sequences with as many as 50 differences (20% of the protein domain) to the wild-type retained functionality. Overall, 21/71 sequences designed with our method were functional. Interestingly, 6/71 sequences showed an improved activity in comparison with the original wild-type protein sequence. These results demonstrate the interest in further exploring the synergies between machine-learning of protein sequence representations and physics grounded modeling strategies informed by structural information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011621

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malbranke, C., Rostain, W., Depardieu, F., Cocco, S., Monasson, R., & Bikard, D.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Malbranke, Cyril
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2023-11-17
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
e1011621
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W4388775348
Cited by
15
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE30-0021 RBMPro, ANR-19-CE30-0021 Decrypted, ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID)
  • École Polytechnique, Université Paris-Saclay
  • Fondation Bettencourt Schueller
  • European Research Council (677823, 101044479)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
Keywords
Cas9, protein design, restricted Boltzmann machine, semi-supervised learning, FoldX, evolutionary information, protein structure prediction, CRISPR/Cas9
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Amino Acid Sequence, Learning, Proteins, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review