Cited by 1,233CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA regulation and diseaseCAR-T cell therapy research

Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants

Open access
Walton, Russell T., Christie, Kathleen A., Whittaker, Madelynn N., Kleinstiver, Benjamin P.·2020·Science

Abstract

A PAMless base editor: CRISPR-Cas DNA base editing typically requires a specific motif for targeting known as a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). This requirement limits the sequences within a genome that can be targeted. Walton et al. engineered specific variants of the Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9 enzyme named SpG and SpRY that could recognize and edit a wider array of PAMs. Using SpRY, the authors were able to correct previously uneditable mutations associated with human disease. Although off-target effects were observed for these engineered Cas enzymes at levels similar to those of the wild-type enzyme, depending on the context, these engineered enzymes widen the potential applications of precision genome editing. Science , this issue p. 290

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aba8853

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Efforts are ongoing to develop PAM-free Cas9 molecules to eliminate PAM site constraints altogether.

    “Efforts are ongoing to develop PAM-free Cas9 molecules to eliminate PAM site constraints altogether, thereby increasing the flexibility and effectiveness of genome editingthrough structure-based rational engineering or by altering amino acid substitutions in the PAM-interacting domain (Walton et al., 2020).”

    From Emerging applications of gene editing technologies for the development of climate-resilient crops (2025) · cites this paper as Walton et al., 2020

    The Results section describes structure-guided substitutions in the PAM-interacting domain aimed at relaxing SpCas9’s PAM preference. The Abstract and Discussion describe SpRY as *near-PAMless*, able to target almost all PAMs, but report reduced activity at some sites. The paper therefore supports the engineering approach and increased targeting flexibility, not the claim that PAM constraints have been eliminated altogether. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CRISPR-Cas dominates the genome editing field because of the ease of using guide RNAs directing the CRISPR complex to specific DNA sequences and the increasing ability to target most sites in the genome.

    “CRISPR-Cas dominates the field because of the ease of using guide RNAs directing the CRISPR complex to specific DNA sequences and the increasing ability to target most sites in the genome.121,122”

    From Fetal hemoglobin in sickle cell anemia (2020) · cites this paper as [122]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that SpRY makes the vast majority of the genome targetable, supporting the claim about increasing targeting range. The passages do not say that CRISPR-Cas dominates genome editing because guide RNAs make it easy to direct the complex to specific sequences. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Walton et al. (2020) introduced the SpG variant, which can recognize a broader range of NGN PAMs.

    “Building on this, Walton et al. (2020) introduced the SpG variant, which can recognize a broader range of NGN PAMs.”
  • SpCas9-NG and SpG can target NGN PAMs.

    “These can be targeted in combination with evolved Cas9 variants such as SpCas9-NG20 or SpG.19”
  • SpRY can target NYN PAMs.

    “These can be targeted with SpRY.19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N., & Kleinstiver, B. P.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Kleinstiver, Benjamin P.
Venue
Science
Published
2020-04-17
Volume
368
Issue
6488
Pages
290-296
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W3013504322
Cited by
1,233
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 200 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 213 · 2022: 203 · 2021: 177 · 2020: 93
FWCI
56.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01-HL142494)
  • National Cancer Institute (R00-CA218870)
  • American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy
  • Margaret Q. Landenberger Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
CRISPR/Cas9, SpCas9, SPG, SpRY, base editing, genome editing, human cells
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Humans, Substrate Specificity, Mutagenesis, Gene Targeting, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, HEK293 Cells, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review