Cited by 3Microbial Natural Products and BiosynthesisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel transformer-based platform for the prediction and design of biosynthetic gene clusters for (un)natural products

Open access
Kawano, Tomoki, Shiraishi, Taro, Kuzuyama, Tomohisa, Umemura, Maiko·2026·PLOS Computational Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), comprising sets of functionally related genes responsible for synthesizing complex natural products, are a rich source of bioactive compounds with pharmaceutical potential. Here, we present a transformer-based framework that models functional domains as linguistic units to capture and predict their positional relationships within genomes. Using a RoBERTa architecture, we trained models on four progressively broader datasets: bacterial BGCs, Actinomycetes genomes, bacterial genomes, and bacterial plus fungal genomes. Evaluation using 2,492 experimentally-validated BGCs from the MIBiG database showed that more than 50% of true domains were ranked first and over 75% within the top 10 candidates. Our models also achieved classification accuracies exceeding 70% for major compound classes including polyketides (PKs) and terpenes. To explore model-guided BGC design, we compared predictions from the BGC-trained and genome-trained models using the BGC for the bacterial diterpenoid cyclooctatin as a case study. The genome-trained model uniquely predicted several domains absent from both the original BGC and the prediction by the BGC-trained model. Heterologous expression of one of those predicted domains in Streptomyces albus , together with the biosynthetic genes for cyclooctatin, yielded an unknown cyclooctatin derivative. This framework not only provides a novel BGC prediction method using machine learning but also facilitates rational design of artificial BGCs. Future integration of transcriptomic, protein structural, and phylogenetic data will enhance the models’ predictive and generative capabilities, supporting accelerated discovery and engineering of natural products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013181

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. MJ Bibb, 2005, Regulation of secondary metabolism in streptomycetes, Curr Opin Microbiol, 8, 208, 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.016 · DOI
  2. AE Osbourn, 2009, Operons, Cell Mol Life Sci, 66, 3755, 10.1007/s00018-009-0114-3 · DOI
  3. H-W Nützmann, 2018, Metabolic Gene Clusters in Eukaryotes, Annu Rev Genet, 52, 159, 10.1146/annurev-genet-120417-031237 · DOI
  4. Y Kanai, 2022, Experimental demonstration of operon formation catalyzed by insertion sequence, Nucleic Acids Res, 50, 1673, 10.1093/nar/gkac004 · DOI
  5. E Kenshole, 2021, Natural product discovery through microbial genome mining, Curr Opin Chem Biol, 60, 47, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.07.010 · DOI
  6. K Blin, 2023, antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, 10.1093/nar/gkad344 · DOI
  7. P Cimermancic, 2014, Insights into secondary metabolism from a global analysis of prokaryotic biosynthetic gene clusters, Cell, 158, 412, 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.034 · DOI
  8. GD Hannigan, 2019, A deep learning genome-mining strategy for biosynthetic gene cluster prediction, Nucleic Acids Res, 47, 10.1093/nar/gkz654 · DOI
  9. H Almeida, 2020, TOUCAN: a framework for fungal biosynthetic gene cluster discovery, NAR Genom Bioinform, 2
  10. Q Lai, 2025, Deciphering the biosynthetic potential of microbial genomes using a BGC language processing neural network model, Nucleic Acids Res, 53
  11. A Rives, 2021, Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 118, 10.1073/pnas.2016239118 · DOI · Paper page
  12. S Zhang, 2023, Applications of transformer-based language models in bioinformatics: a survey, Bioinform Adv, 3, 10.1093/bioadv/vbad001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Y Liu, 2019, RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. arXiv
  14. A Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need. arXiv.
  15. BR Terlouw, 2023, MIBiG 3.0: a community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, 10.1093/nar/gkac1049 · DOI
  16. L van der Maaten, 2008, Visualizing data using t-SNE, J Mach Learn Res, 9, 2579
  17. C Khosla, 2014, Assembly line polyketide synthases: mechanistic insights and unsolved problems, Biochemistry, 53, 2875, 10.1021/bi500290t · DOI
  18. S-Y Kim, 2009, Cloning and heterologous expression of the cyclooctatin biosynthetic gene cluster afford a diterpene cyclase and two p450 hydroxylases, Chem Biol, 16, 736, 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.06.007 · DOI
  19. R Zallot, 2019, The EFI Web Resource for Genomic Enzymology Tools: Leveraging Protein, Genome, and Metagenome Databases to Discover Novel Enzymes and Metabolic Pathways, Biochemistry, 58, 4169, 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00735 · DOI
  20. N Oberg, 2023, EFI-EST, EFI-GNT, and EFI-CGFP: Enzyme Function Initiative (EFI) Web Resource for Genomic Enzymology Tools, J Mol Biol, 435, 168018, 10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168018 · DOI
  21. J Wang, 2022, Scaffolding protein functional sites using deep learning, Science, 377, 387, 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
  22. A Madani, 2023, ProGen: language modeling for protein generation, Nat Mach Intell, 5, 316
  23. RD Finn, 2011, HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching, Nucleic Acids Res, 39
  24. RD Finn, 2010, The Pfam protein families database, Nucleic Acids Res, 38
  25. A Andoni, 2008, Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions, Commun ACM, 51, 117, 10.1145/1327452.1327494 · DOI · Paper page
  26. CD Manning, 2008, Introduction to Information Retrieval., 10.1017/CBO9780511809071 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995. 1137–43.
  28. F Pedregosa, 2011, Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, J Mach Learn Res, 12, 2825
  29. ZS Harris, 1954, Distributional Structure, WORD, 10, 146, 10.1080/00437956.1954.11659520 · DOI · Paper page
  30. PJ Rousseeuw, 1987, Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53, 10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7 · DOI · Paper page
  31. T Calinski, 1974, A dendrite method for cluster analysis, Comm in Stats - Theory & Methods, 3, 1, 10.1080/03610927408827101 · DOI · Paper page
  32. DL Davies, 1979, A Cluster Separation Measure, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 224, 10.1109/TPAMI.1979.4766909 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Kawano, T., Shiraishi, T., Kuzuyama, T., & Umemura, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
PLOS Computational Biology
Published
2026-02-23
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
e1013181
ISSN
  • 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7358
OpenAlex
W7131124619
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (22H05119, 23H04566, 25H01599, 23K18120)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
biosynthetic gene clusters, transformer models, RoBERTa, natural product biosynthesis, polyketides, terpenes, diterpenoids, heterologous expression, Streptomyces albus, MIBiG, actinomycetes
MeSH terms
Biological Products, Multigene Family, Genome, Bacterial, Genome, Fungal, Computational Biology, Biosynthetic Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review