The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene Family Evolution across 12 Drosophila Genomes
Open accessAbstract
Comparison of whole genomes has revealed large and frequent changes in the size of gene families. These changes occur because of high rates of both gene gain (via duplication) and loss (via deletion or pseudogenization), as well as the evolution of entirely new genes. Here we use the genomes of 12 fully sequenced Drosophila species to study the gain and loss of genes at unprecedented resolution. We find large numbers of both gains and losses, with over 40% of all gene families differing in size among the Drosophila. Approximately 17 genes are estimated to be duplicated and fixed in a genome every million years, a rate on par with that previously found in both yeast and mammals. We find many instances of extreme expansions or contractions in the size of gene families, including the expansion of several sex- and spermatogenesis-related families in D. melanogaster that also evolve under positive selection at the nucleotide level. Newly evolved gene families in our dataset are associated with a class of testes-expressed genes known to have evolved de novo in a number of cases. Gene family comparisons also allow us to identify a number of annotated D. melanogaster genes that are unlikely to encode functional proteins, as well as to identify dozens of previously unannotated D. melanogaster genes with conserved homologs in the other Drosophila. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the apparent stasis in total gene number among species has masked rapid turnover in individual gene gain and loss. It is likely that this genomic revolving door has played a large role in shaping the morphological, physiological, and metabolic differences among species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution
De Bie, T., Cristianini, N., Demuth, J. P., & Hahn, M. W. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl097 · Cited by 1,790
Self-citationComparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes
Rubin, G. M., Yandell, M. D., Wortman, J. R., Gabor, G. L., Miklos, Nelson, C. R., Hariharan, I. K., Fortini, M. E., Li, P. W., Apweiler, R., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5461.2204 · Cited by 1,698
The origin of new genes: Glimpses from the young and old
Long, M., Betrán, E., Thornton, K., & Wang, W. (2003) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1204 · Cited by 933
Comparative Genome and Proteome Analysis of Anopheles gambiae and Drosophila melanogaster
Zdobnov, E. M., von Mering, C., Letunic, I., Torrents, D., Suyama, M., Copley, R. R., Christophides, G. K., Thomasova, D., Holt, R. A., Subramanian, G. M., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077061 · Cited by 553
When Less Is More: Gene Loss as an Engine of Evolutionary Change
Olson, M. V. (1999) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302219 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny
Drosophila 12 Genomes Consortium (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06341 · Cited by 2,010
CAFE 5 models variation in evolutionary rates among gene families
Mendes, F. K., Vanderpool, D., Fulton, B., & Hahn, M. W. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1022 · Cited by 833
Self-citationChemoreceptor co-expression in Drosophila melanogaster olfactory neurons
Task, D., Lin, C.-C., Vulpe, A., Afify, A., Ballou, S., Brbic, M., Schlegel, P., Raji, J., Jefferis, G. S., Li, H., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.72599 · Cited by 141
Formation and Longevity of Chimeric and Duplicate Genes in Drosophila melanogaster
Rogers, R. L., Bedford, T., & Hartl, D. L. (2009) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.108.091538 · Cited by 71
Fifteen Million Years of Evolution in the Oryza Genus Shows Extensive Gene Family Expansion
Jacquemin, J., Ammiraju, J. S. S., Haberer, G., Billheimer, D. D., Yu, Y., Liu, L. C., Rivera, L. F., Mayer, K., Chen, M., & Wing, R. A. (2014) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1093/mp/sst149 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Hahn, M. W., Han, M. V., & Han, S.-G.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2007-11-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- e197
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2095829109
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.