The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noncanonical DNA Motifs as Transactivation Targets by Wild Type and Mutant p53
Open accessAbstract
Sequence-specific binding by the human p53 master regulator is critical to its tumor suppressor activity in response to environmental stresses. p53 binds as a tetramer to two decameric half-sites separated by 0-13 nucleotides (nt), originally defined by the consensus RRRCWWGYYY (n = 0-13) RRRCWWGYYY. To better understand the role of sequence, organization, and level of p53 on transactivation at target response elements (REs) by wild type (WT) and mutant p53, we deconstructed the functional p53 canonical consensus sequence using budding yeast and human cell systems. Contrary to early reports on binding in vitro, small increases in distance between decamer half-sites greatly reduces p53 transactivation, as demonstrated for the natural TIGER RE. This was confirmed with human cell extracts using a newly developed, semi-in vitro microsphere binding assay. These results contrast with the synergistic increase in transactivation from a pair of weak, full-site REs in the MDM2 promoter that are separated by an evolutionary conserved 17 bp spacer. Surprisingly, there can be substantial transactivation at noncanonical (1/2)-(a single decamer) and (3/4)-sites, some of which were originally classified as biologically relevant canonical consensus sequences including PIDD and Apaf-1. p53 family members p63 and p73 yielded similar results. Efficient transactivation from noncanonical elements requires tetrameric p53, and the presence of the carboxy terminal, non-specific DNA binding domain enhanced transactivation from noncanonical sequences. Our findings demonstrate that RE sequence, organization, and level of p53 can strongly impact p53-mediated transactivation, thereby changing the view of what constitutes a functional p53 target. Importantly, inclusion of (1/2)- and (3/4)-site REs greatly expands the p53 master regulatory network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
![Figure 1 Isogenomic diploid yeast system to investigate transcriptional capacity of p53 towards many REs at various p53 levels. (A) Transactivation capacities of p53 (WT or mutant) from cognate REs were determined using diploid strains derived from haploids where p53 and reporters with upstream REs were integrated into different chromosomal loci. Within the p53-host strains, p53 (WT or mutant) was controlled by a “rheostatable” GAL1 promoter (blue cells) (previously described [109]) which allows for controlled, inducible expression of p53. Reporter strains contained promoter REs upstream of the minimal CYC1 promoter and either the ADE2 color reporter (REP) or the firefly luciferase reporter (tan cells) [28]. Mating of the REP and p53-host strains results in isogenomic diploid yeast that provide for rapid assessment of the transactivation potential for WT or mutant p53 proteins towards many individual REs in the p53 transcriptional network [14]. (B) Inducible expression of p53 under the rheostatable GAL1 promoter. The GAL1 promoter allows for controlled expression of p53 depending on the level of galactose in the media. Raffinose was added to provide a basal level of expression, as the GAL1 promoter is derepressed, but not induced in media containing this carbon source. Presented is a Western blot analysis of p53 expression 24 hours post-inoculation with raffinose or raffinose plus increasing amounts of galactose (0.004–0.032%). Increases in galactose from 0–0.032% correlated with an increase in p53 over a 100-fold range. The p53 protein was detected with DO-1 and pAb1801 antibodies. The asterisk (*) depicts a longer exposure to reveal protein at basal and lower galactose levels. GAPDH, identified by immunodetection provided a standard loading control. (C) Quantitative assessment of p53-induced transactivation from the p21-5′ RE in vivo. The diploid yeast strain containing GAL1::WT p53 crossed with the p21-5′ RE-luciferase REP was grown overnight in complete medium, diluted, washed and inoculated into selective medium containing either raffinose or raffinose plus increasing galactose (0–0.032%) for 24 hours. Protein lysates were obtained and a luciferase assay was used to determine the transactivation capacity of p53 from the p21-5′ RE. The strength of transactivation was calculated as relative light units/µg protein. Circled are the basal, linear-increase, and plateau phases of the transactivation response as a function of galactose concentration and are referred to as basal, moderate and high levels of p53 expression.](/paper-figures/fb985fd647e54737bb17993ce4fa6a32/noncanonical-dna-motifs-as-transactivation-targets-by-wild-type-and-mutant-p53-figure-1.jpg)

![Figure 3 Spacer decreases p53 transactivation, promoter occupancy and binding in yeast and mammalian cells and in vitro. (A) Transactivation in yeast. The ability of p53 to transactivate from REs containing spacers of variable nucleotide length sequences was measured 24 hours after p53 induction with a quantitative luciferase assay. Induction from each RE at various p53 expression levels were compared to the induction from the p21-5′ RE at 0.024% galactose. The average light units/µg protein for WT p53 towards p21-5′ at 0.024% galactose for a minimum of 6 biological repeats was 1.26 million. *indicates the number of nucleotides in the spacer of the natural RE. Solid arrows identify a ¼-binding site. (B) Human SaOS2 cells were transfected with p21-5′::luciferase reporter constructs containing spacers of increasing length between decamer half-sites in the presence (solid bars) or absence (open bars) of the high expressing pCMV-p53 WT vector. At 48 hours post transfection, induction of the luciferase reporter was assessed. Relative luciferase activity was compared to the pGL3-P plasmid lacking the p53 RE (mock) and is represented by the average and standard deviations of three independent experiments, each containing three replicates. (C) Occupancy of p53 at p21-5′ REs in human cells. The p21-5′ promoter constructs containing the increasing spacers between half-sites were co-transfected with p53 into SaOS2 cells (as described in (B)). Twenty-four hours later, ChIP analysis was performed. Presented are the average and standard deviation from 4 independent experiments (left). PCR products of the Input DNA (input) and ChIP DNA (p53, IgG, or no antibody, Ab) are shown (right). The “M” corresponds to a pGL3-P plasmid control lacking the p53 RE. No bands were observed above the 600 bp markers. (D) In vitro fluorescent microsphere binding assay to evaluate sequence-specific p53-DNA binding interactions (see Materials and Methods). Fluorescent microspheres bearing double stranded DNA fragments were multiplexed and incubated in the presence of nuclear extracts from non-treated (NT) or Doxo-treated (0.6 ug/mL [1 mM] Doxorubicin for 18 hours at 37°C) lymphoblastoid cells. The DNA fragments contained the p21-5′ RE, p21-5′ RE with spacers of increasing length (0–15), p21-5′ half-site RE (left or right), or a scramble sequence.](/paper-figures/191892768e524ebba9f32af5590c3a86/noncanonical-dna-motifs-as-transactivation-targets-by-wild-type-and-mutant-p53-figure-3.jpg)
![Figure 4 Half-sites function as noncanonical REs for transactivation in a sequence-dependent manner in yeast and human cells. (A) Transactivation from decamer REs in the diploid yeast was quantified with a luciferase assay. Protein lysates were obtained 24 hours post inoculation into galactose supplemented media. The average light units/µg protein for WT p53 towards p21-5′ at 0.024% galactose for six biological repeats was 1.8 million. Solid arrows indicate ¼-binding sites. Comparisons were made with transactivation from the p21-5′ full site at high protein levels. (B) Transactivation in human SaOS2 cells. The cells were co-transfected with WT p53 along with either the full, left or right half-sites of the p21-5′ RE containing reporter construct. Transactivation was assessed with the luciferase assay 48 hours later. Relative luciferase activity was compared to a mock transfection containing the promoter-less pGL3 plasmid. Presented are the averages and standard deviations of 3 independent experiments that were each done in triplicate. PCR products of the input DNA (input) and ChIP DNA (p53, IgG or no antibody, Ab) are shown (right). Input and ChIP PCR products for the mock and p21-5′ full-site are shown in Figure 3C. No bands were observed above the 600 bp markers. (C) Sequence dependence of p53 transactivation from decamer half-sites. The extent to which p53 transactivation from half-sites is sequence dependent at high expression levels (2% galactose) was determined with a plasmid-based haploid yeast system [30]. Relative light units/µg protein from ½-sites were compared to transactivation from the yLFM strain containing the p21-5′ full-site RE. The average light units/µg protein from p21-5′ at 2% galactose was 2.9 million.](/paper-figures/acba8df1fda74927aa977d11e3ac133f/noncanonical-dna-motifs-as-transactivation-targets-by-wild-type-and-mutant-p53-figure-4.jpg)

Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, results from multiple studies suggest that p53 can bind and transactivate target genes through noncanonical binding sites, particularly through half-sites.22, 54, 55, 56”
From Census and evaluation of p53 target genes (2017) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression
El-Deiry, W. S., Tokino, T., Velculescu, V. E., Levy, D. B., Parsons, R., Trent, J. M., Lin, D., Mercer, W. E., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90500-p · Cited by 8,321
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division
Levine, A. J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 · Cited by 7,693
Vogelstein, B., Lane, D., & Levine, A. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35042675 · Cited by 6,607 · cited 1×
“. A variety of factors such as stress and cell-type dependent, post-translation modifications and transcriptional co-factors can influence p53-induced transcriptional changes”
BackgroundEmpirical Predictions of Protein Conformation
Chou, P. Y., & Fasman, G. D. (1978) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.47.070178.001343 · Cited by 3,099
Genome-Wide Mapping of in Vivo Protein-DNA Interactions
Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M., & Wold, B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141319 · Cited by 2,927
p53: puzzle and paradigm.Preprint
Ko, L. J., & Prives, C. L. (1996) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.10.9.1054 · Cited by 2,346
PUMA, a Novel Proapoptotic Gene, Is Induced by p53
Nakano, K., & Vousden, K. H. (2001) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00214-3 · Cited by 2,315
Chou, P. Y., & Fasman, G. D. (1974) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi00699a001 · Cited by 2,172
Noxa, a BH3-Only Member of the Bcl-2 Family and Candidate Mediator of p53-Induced Apoptosis
Oda, E., Ohki, R., Murasawa, H., Nemoto, J., Shibue, T., Yamashita, T., Tokino, T., Taniguchi, T., & Tanaka, †. N. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5468.1053 · Cited by 2,112
TIGAR, a p53-Inducible Regulator of Glycolysis and Apoptosis
Bensaad, K., Tsuruta, A., Selak, M. A., Vidal, M. N. C., Nakano, K., Bartrons, R., Gottlieb, E., & Vousden, K. H. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.05.036 · Cited by 2,019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53
Vousden, K. H., & Prives, C. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.037 · Cited by 3,163
Mutant p53: one name, many proteinsPreprint
Freed-Pastor, W. A., & Prives, C. L. (2012) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.190678.112 · Cited by 1,290
Census and evaluation of p53 target genes
Fischer, M. (2017) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2016.502 · Cited by 971
Tumor suppressor p53: Biology, signaling pathways, and therapeutic targeting
Borrero, L. J. H., & El‐Deiry, W. S. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188556 · Cited by 805
Transcriptional Regulation by P53
Beckerman, R., & Prives, C. (2010) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000935 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Jordan, J. J., Menendez, D., Inga, A., Nourredine, M., Bell, D., & Resnick, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Resnick, Michael A.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-06-27
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e1000104
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- PMC
- PMC2518093
- OpenAlex
- W2049945082
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- p53, transcriptional activation, response elements, p63, p73, p53 tetramer, tumor suppressor regulation
- MeSH terms
- Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Biological Assay, Diploidy, DNA, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Transfection, Transcriptional Activation, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Consensus Sequence, Point Mutation, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Genes, Reporter, Dimerization, Response Elements, DNA, Intergenic, Cell Line, Tumor, Luciferases, Renilla, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review