Cited by 128

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analysis of Population Structure: A Unifying Framework and Novel Methods Based on Sparse Factor Analysis

Engelhardt, Barbara E., Stephens, Matthew·2010·PLoS Genetics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001117

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PCA clustering is sensitive to the sample size of different ancestries and also to their amount of genetic drift, which exaggerates principal component distances.

    “It is notable that PCA clustering is sensitive to the sample size of different ancestries and also to their amount of genetic drift, which exaggerates principal component distances 207,208,211,212 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [211]

    The Results section, “Discrete and admixed populations” (page unavailable), reports that removing half the African individuals changed PCA results appreciably, supporting sensitivity to ancestry sample sizes. The passages found do not say that differing amounts of genetic drift exaggerate distances between principal-component clusters. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. NA Rosenberg, 2002, Genetic Structure of Human Populations., Science, 298, 2381, 10.1126/science.1078311 · DOI · Paper page
  2. SK Wasser, 2007, Using DNA to track the origin of the largest ivory seizure since the 1989 trade ban., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 4228, 10.1073/pnas.0609714104 · DOI
  3. HG Parker, 2004, Genetic Structure of the Purebred Domestic Dog., Science, 304, 1160, 10.1126/science.1097406 · DOI
  4. J Pritchard, 2001, Case-Control Studies of Association in Structured or Admixed Populations., Theoretical Population Biology, 60, 227, 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1543 · DOI
  5. D Falush, 2003, Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data: Linked Loci and Correlated Allele Frequencies., Genetics, 164, 1567, 10.1093/genetics/164.4.1567 · DOI
  6. H Tang, 2005, Estimation of individual admixture: Analytical and study design considerations., Genetic Epidemiology, 28, 289, 10.1002/gepi.20064 · DOI
  7. H Tang, 2006, Reconstructing genetic ancestry blocks in admixed individuals., American Journal of Human Genetics, 79, 1, 10.1086/504302 · DOI
  8. DH Alexander, 2009, Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals., Genome Research, 19, 1655, 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
  9. X Zhu, 2002, Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits., Genetic Epidemiology, 23, 181, 10.1002/gepi.210 · DOI
  10. W Buntine, 2002, Variational extensions to EM and multinomial PCA., 10.1007/3-540-36755-1_3 · DOI
  11. JK Pritchard, 2000, Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data., Genetics, 155, 945, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · DOI
  12. C Eckart, 1936, The approximation of one matrix by another of lower rank., Psychometrika, 1, 211, 10.1007/BF02288367 · DOI
  13. C Carvalho, 2008, High-Dimensional Sparse Factor Modelling: Applications in Gene Expression Genomics., Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1438, 10.1198/016214508000000869 · DOI
  14. I Pournara, 2007, Factor analysis for gene regulatory networks and transcription factor activity profiles., BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 10.1186/1471-2105-8-61 · DOI
  15. DD Lee, 1999, Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization., Nature, 401, 788, 10.1038/44565 · DOI
  16. DM Witten, 2009, A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis., Biostatistics, 10, 515, 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008 · DOI
  17. N Lawrence, 2005, Probabilistic non-linear principal component analysis with Gaussian process latent variable models., Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6, 1783
  18. DF Conrad, 2006, A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome., Nature Genetics, 38, 1251, 10.1038/ng1911 · DOI
  19. J Novembre, 2008, Interpreting principal component analyses of spatial population genetic variation., Nature Genetics, 40, 646, 10.1038/ng.139 · DOI
  20. G McVean, 2009, A Genealogical Interpretation of Principal Components Analysis., PLoS Genetics, 5, e1000686, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000686 · DOI · Paper page
  21. D Serre, 2004, Evidence for Gradients of Human Genetic Diversity Within and Among Continents., Genome Research, 14, 1679, 10.1101/gr.2529604 · DOI · Paper page
  22. M West, 2003, Bayesian Factor Regression Models in the Large p, Small n Paradigm., Bayesian Statistics, 7, 723
  23. HF Lopes, 2004, Bayesian model assessment in factor analysis., Statistica Sinica, 14, 41
  24. RR Hudson, 2002, Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation., Bioinformatics, 18, 337, 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.337 · DOI
  25. C Liu, 1994, The ECME algorithm: A simple extension of EM and ECM with faster monotone convergence., Biometrika, 81, 633, 10.1093/biomet/81.4.633 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Engelhardt, B. E., & Stephens, M.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2010-09-16
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
e1001117
ISSN
1553-7404
Cited by
128
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review