Cited by 560Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureRace, Genetics, and Society

A tutorial on how not to over-interpret STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE bar plots

Open access
Lawson, Daniel J., van Dorp, Lucy, Falush, Daniel·2018·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genetic clustering algorithms, implemented in programs such as STRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE, have been used extensively in the characterisation of individuals and populations based on genetic data. A successful example is the reconstruction of the genetic history of African Americans as a product of recent admixture between highly differentiated populations. Histories can also be reconstructed using the same procedure for groups that do not have admixture in their recent history, where recent genetic drift is strong or that deviate in other ways from the underlying inference model. Unfortunately, such histories can be misleading. We have implemented an approach, badMIXTURE, to assess the goodness of fit of the model using the ancestry "palettes" estimated by CHROMOPAINTER and apply it to both simulated data and real case studies. Combining these complementary analyses with additional methods that are designed to test specific hypotheses allows a richer and more robust analysis of recent demographic history.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-05257-7

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results suggest that both LINADMIX and PHCP are highly informative for individuals with ancestry sources similar to those analyzed here.

    “Thus, although ADMIXTURE, the basis of LINADMIX, is known to have certain pitfalls as a tool for quantifying ancestry proportions (Lawson et al., 2018), in the case of individuals with ancestry sources similar to those we have analyzed here, our results suggest that both LINADMIX and PHCP are highly informative.”

    From The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant (2020) · cites this paper as Lawson et al., 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawson, D. J., van Dorp, L., & Falush, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Falush, Daniel
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-08-14
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
3258-3258
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950373858
Cited by
560
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
31.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (104125/Z/14/Z, WT104125AIA)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/M501608/1, MR/L015080/1, MR/M501608/2)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (1357822)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
structure, admixture, genetic clustering, bar charts, overinterpretation, ancestry inference, model goodness of fit, genetic drift, demographic inference
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Black or African American, Computer Simulation, Genetics, Population, Humans, Internationality, Black People, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review