Cited by 299Evolution and Genetic DynamicsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population-Based Resequencing of Experimentally Evolved Populations Reveals the Genetic Basis of Body Size Variation in Drosophila melanogaster

Open access

Turner, Thomas L., Stewart, Andrew D., Fields, Andrew T., Rice, William R., Tarone, Aaron M.·2011·PLoS Genetics

DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336PMC PMC3060078

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Body size is a classic quantitative trait with evolutionarily significant variation within many species. Locating the alleles responsible for this variation would help understand the maintenance of variation in body size in particular, as well as quantitative traits in general. However, successful genome-wide association of genotype and phenotype may require very large sample sizes if alleles have low population frequencies or modest effects. As a complementary approach, we propose that population-based resequencing of experimentally evolved populations allows for considerable power to map functional variation. Here, we use this technique to investigate the genetic basis of natural variation in body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Significant differentiation of hundreds of loci in replicate selection populations supports the hypothesis that the genetic basis of body size variation is very polygenic in D. melanogaster. Significantly differentiated variants are limited to single genes at some loci, allowing precise hypotheses to be formed regarding causal polymorphisms, while other significant regions are large and contain many genes. By using significantly associated polymorphisms as a priori candidates in follow-up studies, these data are expected to provide considerable power to determine the genetic basis of natural variation in body size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., & Lempicki, R. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · Cited by 35,890
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery
Dennis, G., Sherman, B. T., Hosack, D. A., Yang, J., Gao, W., Lane, H. C., & Lempicki, R. A. (2003) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-5-p3 · Cited by 9,327
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (2007) · Genetics Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672308009579 · Cited by 2,675
Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height
Lango Allen, H., Estrada, K., Lettre, G., Berndt, S. I., Weedon, M. N., Rivadeneira, F., Willer, C. J., Jackson, A. U., Vedantam, S., Raychaudhuri, S., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09410 · Cited by 1,945
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
Self-citation
Viable populations for conservation
(1988) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(88)90098-5 · Cited by 1,359
Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli
Barrick, J. E., Yu, D. S., Yoon, S. H., Jeong, H., Oh, T. K., Schneider, D., Lenski, R. E., & Kim, J. F. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08480 · Cited by 1,184

Show all 53 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 299

Molecular evidence supports a genic capture resolution of the lek paradox
Dugand, R. J., Tomkins, J. L., & Kennington, W. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09371-y · Cited by 38
Selection for reproduction under short photoperiods changes diapause-associated traits and induces widespread genomic divergence
Kauranen, H., Kinnunen, J., Hiillos, A., Lankinen, P., Hopkins, D. P., Wiberg, R. A. W., Ritchie, M. G., & Hoikkala, A. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205831 · Cited by 36
Distinct Patterns of Selective Sweep and Polygenic Adaptation in Evolve and Resequence Studies
Barghi, N., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa073 · Cited by 39
Initial Molecular-Level Response to Artificial Selection for Increased Aerobic Metabolism Occurs Primarily through Changes in Gene Expression
Konczal, M., Babik, W., Radwan, J., Sadowska, E. T., & Koteja, P. (2015) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msv038 · Cited by 36
Rapid divergence and convergence of life‐history in experimentally evolved Drosophila melanogaster
Burke, M. K., Barter, T. T., Cabral, L. G., Kezos, J. N., Phillips, M., Rutledge, G. A., Phung, K. H., Chen, R. H., Nguyen, H. D., Mueller, L. D., et al. (2016) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13006 · Cited by 36
Shared Genomic Regions Between Derivatives of a Large Segregating Population of Maize Identified Using Bulked Segregant Analysis Sequencing and Traditional Linkage Analysis
Haase, N., Beissinger, T. M., Hirsch, C. N., Vaillancourt, B., Deshpande, S., Barry, K., Buell, C. R., Kaeppler, S. M., & de León, N. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.017665 · Cited by 35
Arrest of sex-specific adaptation during the evolution of sexual dimorphism in Drosophila
Stewart, A. D., & Rice, W. R. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0613-4 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
The Genomic Signal of Partial Sweeps in Mimulus guttatus
Kelly, J. K., Koseva, B. S., & Mojica, J. P. (2013) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evt100 · Cited by 34
Ancestral population reconstitution from isofemale lines as a tool for experimental evolution
Nouhaud, P., Tobler, R., Nolte, V., & Schlötterer, C. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2402 · Cited by 33
Estimating virus effective population size and selection without neutral markers
Rousseau, E., Moury, B., Mailleret, L., Senoussi, R., Palloix, A., Simon, V., Valière, S., Grognard, F., & Fabre, F. (2017) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1006702 · Cited by 37
Resurrection genomics provides molecular and phenotypic evidence of rapid adaptation to salinization in a keystone aquatic species
Wersebe, M. J., & Weider, L. J. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2217276120 · Cited by 32
Genomic Response to Selection for Predatory Behavior in a Mammalian Model of Adaptive Radiation
Konczal, M., Koteja, P., Orlowska‐Feuer, P., Radwan, J., Sadowska, E. T., & Babik, W. (2016) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msw121 · Cited by 31
SNP2GO: Functional Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies
Szkiba, D., Kapun, M., von Haeseler, A., & Gallach, M. (2014) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.113.160341 · Cited by 32
Skull shape and Bergmann's rule in mammals: hints from Old World porcupines
Mori, E., Ancillotto, L., Lovari, S., Russo, D., Nerva, L., Mohamed, W. F., Motro, Y., Bari, P. D., & Plebani, M. (2019) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12651 · Cited by 31
Identification of Laying-Related SNP Markers in Geese Using RAD Sequencing
Yu, S., Chu, W., Zhang, L., Han, H., Zhao, R.-X., Wu, W., Zhu, J., Dodson, M. V., Wei, W., Liu, H., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131572 · Cited by 33
Maintenance of genetic diversity through plant–herbivore interactions
Gloss, A. D., Dittrich, A. C. N., Goldman-Huertas, B., & Whiteman, N. K. (2013) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2013.06.002 · Cited by 31
High Resolution Mapping of Candidate Alleles for Desiccation Resistance in Drosophila melanogaster under Selection
Telonis‐Scott, M., Gane, M., DeGaris, S., Sgrò, C. M., & Hoffmann, A. A. (2011) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msr294 · Cited by 30
Life history evolution and cellular mechanisms associated with increased size in high‐altitude Drosophila
Lack, J., Yassin, A., Sprengelmeyer, Q. D., Johanning, E. J., David, J. R., & Pool, J. E. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2327 · Cited by 30
Drosophila simulans : A Species with Improved Resolution in Evolve and Resequence Studies
Barghi, N., Tobler, R., Nolte, V., & Schlötterer, C. (2017) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.043349 · Cited by 31
Different Genomic Changes Underlie Adaptive Evolution in Populations of Contrasting History
Seabra, S. G., Fragata, I., Santos, M. A., Faria, G. S., Santos, M. A., Sousa, V. C., Simões, P., & Matos, M. (2017) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msx247 · Cited by 27
The Genomic Architecture of Flowering Time Varies Across Space and Time in Mimulus guttatus
Monnahan, P. J., & Kelly, J. K. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.117.201483 · Cited by 29
Network‐regulated organ allometry: The developmental regulation of morphological scaling
Vea, I. M., & Shingleton, A. W. (2020) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Developmental Biology · doi:10.1002/wdev.391 · Cited by 29
The contribution of mutation and selection to multivariate quantitative genetic variance in an outbred population of Drosophila serrata
Dugand, R. J., Aguirre, J. D., Hine, E., Blows, M. W., & McGuigan, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2026217118 · Cited by 28
Is There any Genetic Variation among Native Mexican and Argentinian Populations ofDalbulus maidis(Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)?
Palomera, V., Bertin, S., Rodríguez, A., Bosco, D., Virla, E. G., & Moya‐Raygoza, G. (2012) · Florida Entomologist · doi:10.1653/024.095.0123 · Cited by 28
Detecting selected haplotype blocks in evolve and resequence experiments
Otte, K. A., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13244 · Cited by 25
What paths do advantageous alleles take during short‐term evolutionary change?
Burke, M. K., & Long, A. D. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2012.05745.x · Cited by 26
Genomes within genomes: nested symbiosis and its implications for plant evolution
Batstone, R. T. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17847 · Cited by 26
Mass production of SNP markers in a nonmodel passerine bird through RAD sequencing and contig mapping to the zebra finch genome
Bourgeois, Y., Lhuillier, É., Cezard, T., Bertrand, J. A. M., Delahaie, B., Cornuault, J., Duval, T., Bouchez, O., Milá, B., & Thébaud, C. (2013) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12137 · Cited by 25
Re-focusing sampling, design and experimental methods to assess rapid evolution by non-native plant species
Lucas, M. S., Hensen, I., Barratt, C. D., Callaway, R. M., Durka, W., Lekberg, Y., Nagy, D. U., Onstein, R. E., Shah, M. A., van Dam, N. M., et al. (2024) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-024-03249-x · Cited by 25
The genomic distribution of transposable elements is driven by spatially variable purifying selection
Langmüller, A. M., Nolte, V., Dolezal, M., & Schlötterer, C. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad635 · Cited by 24
Genomic time‐series data show that gene flow maintains high genetic diversity despite substantial genetic drift in a butterfly species
Gompert, Z., Springer, A., Brady, M., Chaturvedi, S., & Lucas, L. K. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16111 · Cited by 23
Genome-wide analysis of long-term evolutionary domestication in Drosophila melanogaster
Phillips, M., Long, A. D., Greenspan, Z. S., Greer, L. F., Burke, M. K., Villeponteau, B., Matsagas, K. C., Rizza, C. L., Mueller, L. D., & Rose, M. R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39281 · Cited by 23
Genetic Architecture of Maize Rind Strength Revealed by the Analysis of Divergently Selected Populations
Kumar, R., Gyawali, A., Morrison, G. D., Saski, C. A., Robertson, D. J., Cook, D. D., Tharayil, N., Schaefer, R., Beissinger, T. M., & Sekhon, R. S. (2021) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcab059 · Cited by 22
An Experimental Test of Adaptive Introgression in Locally Adapted Populations of Splash Pool Copepods
Griffiths, J. S., Kawji, Y., & Kelly, M. W. (2020) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msaa289 · Cited by 20
Increased time sampling in an evolve‐and‐resequence experiment with outcrossing Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals multiple paths of adaptive change
Phillips, M., Kutch, I. C., Long, A. D., & Burke, M. K. (2020) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15687 · Cited by 18
The Extracellular Milieu of Toxoplasma 's Lytic Cycle Drives Lab Adaptation, Primarily by Transcriptional Reprogramming
Primo, V. A., Rezvani, Y., Farrell, A., Murphy, C. Q., Lou, J., Vajdi, A., Marth, G. T., Zarringhalam, K., & Gubbels, M. (2021) · mSystems · doi:10.1128/msystems.01196-21 · Cited by 22
Complex patterns of cis‐regulatory polymorphisms in ebony underlie standing pigmentation variation in Drosophila melanogaster
Miyagi, R., Akiyama, N., Osada, N., & Takahashi, A. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13432 · Cited by 21
From Nature to the Lab: Establishing Drosophila Resources for Evolutionary Genetics
Faria, V. G., & Sucena, É. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00061 · Cited by 20
The genetic basis of population fecundity prediction across multiple field populations of Nilaparvata lugens
Sun, Z. X., Zhai, Y. F., Zhang, J. Q., Kang, K., Cai, J. H., Fu, Y., Qiu, J., Shen, J. W., & Zhang, W. Q. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13069 · Cited by 18
Nucleotide diversity inflation as a genome-wide response to experimental lifespan extension in Drosophila melanogaster
Michalak, P., Kang, L., Sarup, P. M., Schou, M. F., & Loeschcke, V. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3485-0 · Cited by 17
Shifting the paradigm in Evolve and Resequence studies: From analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms to selected haplotype blocks
Barghi, N., & Schlötterer, C. (2019) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.14992 · Cited by 18
Effects of evolutionary history on genome wide and phenotypic convergence in Drosophila populations
Phillips, M., Rutledge, G. A., Kezos, J. N., Greenspan, Z. S., Talbott, A., Matty, S., Arain, H., Mueller, L. D., Rose, M. R., & Shahrestani, P. (2018) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5118-7 · Cited by 17
Monitoring rapid evolution of plant populations at scale with Pool-SequencingPreprint
Czech, L., Peng, Y., Spence, J. P., Lang, P. L. M., Bellagio, T., Hildebrandt, J. C., Fritschi, K., Schwab, R., Rowan, B. A., Weigel, D., et al. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.02.477408 · Cited by 16
Utility and challenges of using whole‐genome resequencing to detect emerging insect and mite resistance in agroecosystems
Fritz, M. L. (2022) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.13484 · Cited by 18
Experimentally evolved populations of the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida allow the targeting of genomic footprints of selection due to host adaptation
Eoche‐Bosy, D., Gauthier, J., Juhel, A. S., Esquibet, M., Fournet, S., Grenier, É., & Montarry, J. (2016) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.12646 · Cited by 16
An empirical Bayes testing procedure for detecting variants in analysis of next generation sequencing data
Zhao, Z., Wang, W., & Wei, Z. (2013) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aoas660 · Cited by 14
Female responses to experimental removal of sexual selection components in Drosophila melanogaster
Innocenti, P., Flis, I., & Morrow, E. H. (2014) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/preaccept-3498630041339090 · Cited by 16
Is Population Genetics Really Relevant to Evolutionary Biology?
Olson, M. E. (2024) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-024-09630-x · Cited by 15
A Mixed Model Approach to Genome-Wide Association Studies for Selection Signatures, with Application to Mice Bred for Voluntary Exercise Behavior
Xu, S., & Garland, T. (2017) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.117.300102 · Cited by 15
Adaptation in Outbred Sexual Yeast is Repeatable, Polygenic and Favors Rare Haplotypes
Linder, R. A., Zabanavar, B., Majumder, A., Hoang, H. C.-S., Delgado, V. G., Tran, R., La, V. T., Leemans, S. W., & Long, A. D. (2022) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msac248 · Cited by 15
Large-scale assessment of olfactory preferences and learning in Drosophila melanogaster : behavioral and genetic components
Versace, E., & Reisenberger, J. (2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1214 · Cited by 15
Optimizing the Power to Identify the Genetic Basis of Complex Traits with Evolve and Resequence Studies
Vlachos, C., & Kofler, R. (2019) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msz183 · Cited by 15
Long-Term Dynamics Among Wolbachia Strains During Thermal Adaptation of Their Drosophila melanogaster Hosts
Mazzucco, R., Nolte, V., Vijayan, T., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00482 · Cited by 11
Low concordance of short‐term and long‐term selection responses in experimental Drosophila populations
Langmüller, A. M., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15579 · Cited by 14
Using the variability of linkage disequilibrium between subpopulations to infer sweeps and epistatic selection in a diverse panel of chickens
Beissinger, T. M., Gholami, M., Erbe, M., Weigend, S., Weigend, A., de Leon, N., Gianola, D., & Simianer, H. (2016) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.2015.81 · Cited by 14
Moving beyond heritability in the search for coral adaptive potential
Richards, T. J., McGuigan, K., Aguirre, J. D., Humanes, A., Bozec, Y., Mumby, P. J., & Riginos, C. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16719 · Cited by 14
A Single Nucleotide Variant in the PPARγ-homolog Eip75B Affects Fecundity in Drosophila
Hoedjes, K. M., Kostic, H., Flatt, T., & Keller, L. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad018 · Cited by 14
Combining Experimental Evolution and Genomics to Understand How Seed Beetles Adapt to a Marginal Host Plant
Rêgo, A., Chaturvedi, S., Springer, A., Lish, A. M., Barton, C. L., Kapheim, K. M., Messina, F. J., & Gompert, Z. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11040400 · Cited by 14
Agroecological genomics and participatory science: optimizing crop mixtures for agricultural diversification
Santamarina, C., Mathieu, L., Bitocchi, E., Pieri, A., Bellucci, E., Vittori, V. D., Susek, K., Scossa, F., Nanni, L., & Papa, R. (2025) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2025.04.008 · Cited by 14
Experimental Evolution in a Warming World: The Omics Era
Santos, M. A., Carromeu‐Santos, A., Quina, A. S., Santos, M. A., Kristensen, T. N., Mauro Santos, A., Matos, M., Fragata, I., & Simões, P. (2024) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae148 · Cited by 13
Effect of Phenotype Selection on Genome Size Variation in Two Species of Diptera
Hjelmen, C. E., Parrott, J. J., Srivastav, S. P., McGuane, A. S., Ellis, L. L., Stewart, A. D., Johnston, J. S., & Tarone, A. M. (2020) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes11020218 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Multiple haplotype reconstruction from allele frequency data
Pelizzola, M., Behr, M., Li, H., Munk, A., & Futschik, A. (2021) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00056-5 · Cited by 13
Genetic Architecture of Flowering Time Differs Between Populations With Contrasting Demographic and Selective Histories
Neto, C., & Hancock, A. M. (2023) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msad185 · Cited by 12
Comparative Analyses Identify the Contributions of Exotic Donors to Disease Resistance in a Barley Experimental Population
Fang, Z., Eule-Nashoba, A., Powers, C., Kono, T. J. Y., Takuno, S., Morrell, P. L., & Smith, K. P. (2013) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.113.007294 · Cited by 12
Highly Parallel Genomic Selection Response in Replicated Drosophila melanogaster Populations with Reduced Genetic Variation
Burny, C., Nolte, V., Dolezal, M., & Schlötterer, C. (2021) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evab239 · Cited by 13
Seasonal variation in wing size and shape of Drosophila melanogaster reveals rapid adaptation to environmental changes
Önder, B. Ş., & Aksoy, C. F. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-18891-5 · Cited by 12
Genomic basis of evolutionary change: evolving immunity
Wertheim, B. (2015) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00222 · Cited by 12
Male size does not affect the strength of male mate choice for high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster
Lev, A., & Pischedda, A. (2023) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.14206 · Cited by 11
Selection for abdominal tergite pigmentation and correlated responses in the trident: a case study in Drosophila melanogaster
Rajpurohit, S., & Gibbs, A. G. (2012) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01870.x · Cited by 11
Using Pool-seq to Search for Genomic Regions Affected by Hybrid Inviability in the copepod T. californicus
Lima, T. G., & Willett, C. S. (2018) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esx115 · Cited by 11
Regulatory and sequence evolution in response to selection for improved associative learning ability in Nasonia vitripennis
Kraaijeveld, K., Oostra, V., Liefting, M., Wertheim, B., de Meijer, E., & Ellers, J. (2018) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-018-5310-9 · Cited by 10
Secondary Evolve and Resequencing: An Experimental Confirmation of Putative Selection Targets without Phenotyping
Burny, C., Nolte, V., Nouhaud, P., Dolezal, M., & Schlötterer, C. (2020) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa036 · Cited by 11
Genome-wide selection signatures reveal widespread synergistic effects of two different stressors in Drosophila melanogaster
Burny, C., Nolte, V., Dolezal, M., & Schlötterer, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.1857 · Cited by 11
Crossing design shapes patterns of genetic variation in synthetic recombinant populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Phillips, M., Kutch, I. C., McHugh, K. M., Taggard, S. K., & Burke, M. K. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-99026-0 · Cited by 10
The Effects of Quantitative Trait Architecture on Detection Power in Short-Term Artificial Selection Experiments
Lou, R. N., Therkildsen, N. O., & Messer, P. W. (2020) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401287 · Cited by 10
Natural Genetic Variation and Candidate Genes for Morphological Traits in Drosophila melanogaster
Carreira, V. P., Mensch, J., Hasson, E., & Fanara, J. J. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160069 · Cited by 10
Automated Phenotyping Indicates Pupal Size in Drosophila Is a Highly Heritable Trait with an Apparent Polygenic Basis
Reeves, R. G., & Tautz, D. (2017) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.039883 · Cited by 8
Sexually discordant selection is associated with trait-specific morphological changes and a complex genomic response
Audet, T., Krol, J., Pelletier, K., Stewart, A. D., & Dworkin, I. M. (2024) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpae071 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Bait‐ER: A Bayesian method to detect targets of selection in Evolve‐and‐Resequence experiments
Barata, C., Borges, R., & Kosiol, C. (2022) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.14134 · Cited by 10
The genetic architecture of ecological adaptation: intraspecific variation in host plant use by the lepidopteran crop pest Chloridea virescens
Oppenheim, S. J., Gould, F. L., & Hopper, K. R. (2017) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/s41437-017-0016-3 · Cited by 9
Selection for Early Reproduction Leads to Accelerated Aging and Extensive Metabolic Remodeling in Drosophila melanogaster
Hubert, D. L., Arnold, K. R., Greenspan, Z. S., Pupo, A., Robinson, R. D., Chavarin, V. V., Barter, T. T., Djukovic, D., Raftery, D., Vue, Z., et al. (2025) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf082 · Cited by 9
Size‐selective harvesting drives genomic shifts in a harvested population
Sadler, D. E., Sävilammi, T., van Dijk, S. N., Watts, P. C., & Uusi‐Heikkilä, S. (2024) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.15901 · Cited by 8
Experimental evolution, behavior and genetics: Associative learning as a case study
Versace, E. (2015) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/61.2.226 · Cited by 8
Natural variation in Drosophila shows weak pleiotropic effects
Christodoulaki, E., Nolte, V., Lai, W., & Schlötterer, C. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-022-02680-4 · Cited by 7
Integrating Pool‐seq uncertainties into demographic inference
Carvalho, J., Morales, H. E., Faria, R., Butlin, R. K., & Sousa, V. C. (2023) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13834 · Cited by 7
Life history changes associated with over 400 generations of artificial selection on body size in Drosophila
Stewart, A. D., Herrick, C. M., Fitzgibbon, T. R., Wehner, J. M., Lev, A., Venti, P. A., & Pischedda, A. (2024) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1093/jeb/voae066 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Evolutionary Responses of Drosophila melanogaster Under Chronic Malnutrition
Ahmad, M., Keebaugh, E. S., Tariq, M., & Ja, W. W. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00047 · Cited by 7
The evolution of larger size in high-altitude Drosophila melanogaster has a variable genetic architecture
Sprengelmeyer, Q. D., Lack, J., Braun, D. T., Monette, M. J., & Pool, J. E. (2022) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkab454 · Cited by 7
Rapid response of fly populations to gene dosage across development and generations
Li, X., Gándara, L., Ekelöf, M., Richter, K., Alexandrov, T., & Crocker, J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48960-4 · Cited by 7
Selection for Silage Yield and Composition Did Not Affect Genomic Diversity Within the Wisconsin Quality Synthetic Maize Population
Lorenz, A. J., Beissinger, T. M., Silva, R. R., & de León, N. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.015263 · Cited by 7
Experimental Evolution and Heart Function inDrosophila
Shahrestani, P., Burke, M. K., Birse, R. T., Kezos, J. N., Ocorr, K. A., Mueller, L. D., Rose, M. R., & Bodmer, R. (2016) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/689288 · Cited by 7
Artificial selection on sexual aggression: Correlated traits and possible trade‐offs
Dukas, R., Yan, J. L., Scott, A. M., Sivaratnam, S., & Baxter, C. M. (2020) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13993 · Cited by 6
The FlyCatwalk: A High-Throughput Feature-Based Sorting System for Artificial Selection in Drosophila
Medici, V., Vonesch, S. C., Fry, S. N., & Hafen, E. (2015) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.013664 · Cited by 6
Parallel Genome-Wide Fixation of Ancestral Alleles in Partially Outcrossing Experimental Populations ofCaenorhabditis elegans
Chandler, C. H. (2014) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.114.012914 · Cited by 6
Estimation of population genetic parameters using an EM algorithm and sequence data from experimental evolution populations
Kojima, Y., Matsumoto, H., & Kiryu, H. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz498 · Cited by 6
Fine Mapping without Phenotyping: Identification of Selection Targets in Secondary Evolve and Resequence Experiments
Langmüller, A. M., Dolezal, M., & Schlötterer, C. (2021) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evab154 · Cited by 5
When can fitness epistasis be ignored in a polygenic trait at equilibrium?Preprint
Devi, A., & Jain, K. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.01.25.525607 · Cited by 6
Repeatable phenotypic but not genetic response to selection on body size in the black soldier fly
Generalovic, T. N., Zhou, W., Zhao, L. C., Leonard, S., Warren, I. A., Pipan, M., & Jiggins, C. D. (2025) · doi:10.1101/2025.02.25.640052 · Cited by 6
Evolution and Plasticity of Gene Expression Under Progressive Warming in Drosophila subobscura
Santos, M. A., Santos, M. A., Quina, A. S., Mauro Santos, A., Matos, M., & Simões, P. (2024) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.17548 · Cited by 5
Continent-wide differentiation of fitness traits and patterns of climate adaptation among European populations of Drosophila melanogaster
Mitchell, E. D., Kerdaffrec, E., Harney, E., Paulo, T. F., Veselinović, M. S., Tanasković, M., Tyukmaeva, V. I., Abaurrea, T. M., Aksoy, C. F., Argyridou, E., et al. (2025) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1093/evlett/qraf014 · Cited by 7

Authors: Turner, T. L., Stewart, A. D., Fields, A. T., Rice, W. R., & Tarone, A. M.
Affiliations: University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author: Turner, Thomas L.
ORCID: Turner, Thomas L.
Stewart, Andrew D.
Fields, Andrew T.
Tarone, Aaron M.
Venue: PLoS Genetics
Publisher: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published: 2011-03-17
Volume: 7
Issue: 3
Pages: e1001336
ISSN: 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
1553-7404
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001336
PMC: PMC3060078
OpenAlex: W2036620956
Cited by: 297
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 19 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
FWCI: 12.97
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (unspecified)
Locations: PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) (submittedVersion)
Funders: Texas AgriLife Research
National Institutes of Health
University of California, Santa Barbara
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD057974)
Topics: Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords: body size variation, Drosophila melanogaster, experimental evolution, quantitative trait loci, polygenic inheritance, natural genetic variation, selection signatures, genome-wide association study
MeSH terms: Alleles, Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Male, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Body Size, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Population-Based Resequencing of Experimentally Evolved Populations Reveals the Genetic Basis of Body Size Variation in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks