The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contribution of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Mouse Gametic DNA Methylomes to Establish Oocyte-Specific Heritable Marks
Open accessAbstract
Genome-wide dynamic changes in DNA methylation are indispensable for germline development and genomic imprinting in mammals. Here, we report single-base resolution DNA methylome and transcriptome maps of mouse germ cells, generated using whole-genome shotgun bisulfite sequencing and cDNA sequencing (mRNA-seq). Oocyte genomes showed a significant positive correlation between mRNA transcript levels and methylation of the transcribed region. Sperm genomes had nearly complete coverage of methylation, except in the CpG-rich regions, and showed a significant negative correlation between gene expression and promoter methylation. Thus, these methylome maps revealed that oocytes and sperms are widely different in the extent and distribution of DNA methylation. Furthermore, a comparison of oocyte and sperm methylomes identified more than 1,600 CpG islands differentially methylated in oocytes and sperm (germline differentially methylated regions, gDMRs), in addition to the known imprinting control regions (ICRs). About half of these differentially methylated DNA sequences appear to be at least partially resistant to the global DNA demethylation that occurs during preimplantation development. In the absence of Dnmt3L, neither methylation of most oocyte-methylated gDMRs nor intragenic methylation was observed. There was also genome-wide hypomethylation, and partial methylation at particular retrotransposons, while maintaining global gene expression, in oocytes. Along with the identification of the many Dnmt3L-dependent gDMRs at intragenic regions, the present results suggest that oocyte methylation can be divided into 2 types: Dnmt3L-dependent methylation, which is required for maternal methylation imprinting, and Dnmt3L-independent methylation, which might be essential for endogenous retroviral DNA silencing. The present data provide entirely new perspectives on the evaluation of epigenetic markers in germline cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences
Lister, R., Pelizzola, M., Dowen, R. H., Hawkins, R. D., Hon, G., Tonti-Filippini, J., Nery, J. R., Lee, L., Ye, Z., Ngo, Q.-M., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08514 · Cited by 4,673
Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells
Meissner, A., Mikkelsen, T. S., Gu, H., Wernig, M., Hanna, J., Sivachenko, A., Zhang, X., Bernstein, B. E., Nusbaum, C., Jaffe, D. B., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07107 · Cited by 2,536
Highly Integrated Single-Base Resolution Maps of the Epigenome in Arabidopsis
Lister, R., O'Malley, R. C., Tonti-Filippini, J., Gregory, B. D., Berry, C. C., Millar, A. H., & Ecker, J. R. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.029 · Cited by 2,418
Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning
Cokus, S. J., Feng, S., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Merriman, B., Haudenschild, C. D., Pradhan, S., Nelson, S. F., Pellegrini, M., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06745 · Cited by 2,256
Weber, M., Hellmann, I., Stadler, M. B., Ramos, L., Pääbo, S., Rebhan, M., & Schübeler, D. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1990 · Cited by 2,221
New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells
Tesar, P. J., Chenoweth, J. G., Brook, F. A., Davies, T. J., Evans, E. P., Mack, D. L., Gardner, R. L., & McKay, R. D. G. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05972 · Cited by 2,152
Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development
Li, E. (2002) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg887 · Cited by 1,900
Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation
Zemach, A., McDaniel, I. E., Silva, P., & Zilberman, D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1186366 · Cited by 1,793
Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters
Maunakea, A. K., Nagarajan, R. P., Bilenky, M., Ballinger, T. J., D’Souza, C., Fouse, S. D., Johnson, B. E., Hong, C., Nielsen, C., Zhao, Y., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09165 · Cited by 1,743
Cited by
DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development
Smith, Z. D., & Meissner, A. (2013) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3354 · Cited by 3,045
Reversing DNA Methylation: Mechanisms, Genomics, and Biological Functions
Wu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019 · Cited by 1,065
“5), the genome of inner cell mass (ICM) cells becomes hypomethylated ( 21% CpG methylation) as compared to sperm (90%) or oocyte (40%) methylome after replication-dependent dilution of maternal 5mC and paternal 5hmC/5fC/5caC (Kobayashi et al., 2012).”
InfluentialThe Dynamics of Genome-wide DNA Methylation Reprogramming in Mouse Primordial Germ Cells
Seisenberger, S., Andrews, S., Krueger, F., Arand, J., Walter, J., Santos, F., Popp, C., Thienpont, B., Dean, W., & Reik, W. (2012) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2012.11.001 · Cited by 973
Vitamin C induces Tet-dependent DNA demethylation and a blastocyst-like state in ES cells
Blaschke, K., Ebata, K. T., Karimi, M. M., Zepeda-Martínez, J. A., Goyal, P., Mahapatra, S., Tam, A., Laird, D. J., Hirst, M., Rao, A., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12362 · Cited by 865
DNA methylation dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the germline and preimplantation embryos
Messerschmidt, D. M., Knowles, B. B., & Solter, D. (2014) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.234294.113 · Cited by 729
Metadata
- Authors
- Kobayashi, H., Sakurai, T., Imai, M., Takahashi, N., Fukuda, A., Yayoi, O., Sato, S., Nakabayashi, K., Hata, K., Sotomaru, Y., Suzuki, Y., & Kono, T.
- Venue
- PLoS Genetics
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2012-01-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1002440
- ISSN
- 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-7404
- OpenAlex
- W2034219651
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 19.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contribution of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Mouse Gametic DNA Methylomes to Establish Oocyte-Specific Heritable Marks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002440
- The paper
- Kobayashi, H., Sakurai, T., Imai, M., Takahashi, N., Fukuda, A., Yayoi, O., Sato, S., Nakabayashi, K., Hata, K., Sotomaru, Y., Suzuki, Y., & Kono, T. (2012). Contribution of Intragenic DNA Methylation in Mouse Gametic DNA Methylomes to Establish Oocyte-Specific Heritable Marks. PLoS Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002440
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
