Cited by 82Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Genetic and anatomical basis of the barrier separating wakefulness and anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness

Open access
Joiner, William J., Friedman, Eliot B., Hung, Hsiao-Tung, Koh, Kyunghee, Sowcik, Mallory, Sehgal, Amita, Kelz, Max B.·2013·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

A robust, bistable switch regulates the fluctuations between wakefulness and natural sleep as well as those between wakefulness and anesthetic-induced unresponsiveness. We previously provided experimental evidence for the existence of a behavioral barrier to transitions between these states of arousal, which we call neural inertia. Here we show that neural inertia is controlled by processes that contribute to sleep homeostasis and requires four genes involved in electrical excitability: Sh, sss, na and unc79. Although loss of function mutations in these genes can increase or decrease sensitivity to anesthesia induction, surprisingly, they all collapse neural inertia. These effects are genetically selective: neural inertia is not perturbed by loss-of-function mutations in all genes required for the sleep/wake cycle. These effects are also anatomically selective: sss acts in different neurons to influence arousal-promoting and arousal-suppressing processes underlying neural inertia. Supporting the idea that anesthesia and sleep share some, but not all, genetic and anatomical arousal-regulating pathways, we demonstrate that increasing homeostatic sleep drive widens the neural inertial barrier. We propose that processes selectively contributing to sleep homeostasis and neural inertia may be impaired in pathophysiological conditions such as coma and persistent vegetative states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003605

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss-of-function sleepless mutants show resistance to induction of and emergence from anesthesia similar to shaker mutant flies.

    “Anesthetic responses in loss-of-function sleepless mutants exhibit similar resistance to induction of and emergence from anesthesia, phenocopying responses of shaker mutant flies [58].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

  • The shared circuits hypothesis between sleep and anesthesia has been replicated across invertebrates to mammals.

    “This shared circuits hypothesis has been replicated across divergent species spanning invertebrates to mammals [54, 58, 82, 98, 99, 101].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joiner, W. J., Friedman, E. B., Hung, H.-T., Koh, K., Sowcik, M., Sehgal, A., & Kelz, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Kelz, Max B.
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2013-09-05
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
e1003605
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W2096100413
Cited by
82
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Medicine Forum (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Whitehall Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM088156, R01GM088221)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS072431)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
wakefulness, sleep homeostasis, arousal regulation, bistable switch, SH gene, sodium channels, loss-of-function mutations, homeostatic sleep drive, coma, persistent vegetative state, sleep-wake cycle
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Brain, Circadian Rhythm, Drosophila melanogaster, Homeostasis, Humans, Ion Channels, Membrane Proteins, Mutation, Neurons, Sleep, Wakefulness, Drosophila Proteins, Shaker Superfamily of Potassium Channels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review