Cited by 230Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Role of endogenous sleep-wake and analgesic systems in anesthesia

Open access
Lu, Jun, Nelson, Laura E., Franks, Nick, Maze, Mervyn, Chamberlin, Nancy L., Saper, Clifford B.·2008·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Classical anesthetics of the γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABA A )‐enhancing class (e.g., pentobarbital, chloral hydrate, muscimol, and ethanol) produce analgesia and unconsciousness (sedation). Dissociative anesthetics that antagonize the N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor (e.g., ketamine, MK‐801, dextromethorphan, and phencyclidine) produce analgesia but do not induce complete loss of consciousness. To understand the mechanisms underlying loss of consciousness and analgesia induced by general anesthetics, we examined the patterns of expression of c‐Fos protein in the brain and correlated these with physiological effects of systemically administering GABAergic agents and ketamine at dosages used clinically for anesthesia in rats. We found that GABAergic agents produced predominantly delta activity in the electroencephalogram (EEG) and sedation. In contrast, anesthetic doses of ketamine induced sedation, followed by active arousal behaviors, and produced a faster EEG in the theta range. Consistent with its behavioral effects, ketamine induced Fos expression in cholinergic, monoaminergic, and orexinergic arousal systems and completely suppressed Fos immunoreactivity in the sleep‐promoting ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO). In contrast, GABAergic agents suppressed Fos in the same arousal‐promoting systems but increased the number of Fos‐immunoreactive neurons in the VLPO compared with waking control animals. All anesthetics tested induced Fos in the spinally projecting noradrenergic A5–7 groups. 6‐hydroxydopamine lesions of the A5–7 groups or ibotenic acid lesions of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray matter (vlPAG) attenuated antinociceptive responses to noxious thermal stimulation (tail‐flick test) by both types of anesthetics. We hypothesize that neural substrates of sleep‐wake behavior are engaged by low‐dose sedative anesthetics and that the mesopontine descending noradrenergic cell groups contribute to the analgesic effects of both NMDA receptor antagonists and GABA A receptor‐enhancing anesthetics. J. Comp. Neurol. 508:648–662, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.21685

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • VLPO metabolic activation, measured by c-Fos, is associated with various sedative-hypnotic drugs.

    “identified the metabolic activation of VLPO—as determined by c-Fos expression, a marker of antecedent cellular activity—in association with a variety of sedative-hypnotic drugs [98–100].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [100]

  • Except for ketamine, systemic hypnotic doses of every general anesthetic examined recruit sleep-promoting VLPO neurons.

    “with the exception of ketamine, systemic delivery of hypnotic doses of every general anesthetic examined recruits sleep-promoting neurons in the VLPO [98–102]”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [100]

  • Using c-Fos as a proxy, neurons in many wake-promoting nuclei are inhibited during general anesthesia.

    “using c-Fos as a proxy for antecedent activity, neurons within many of these nuclei have been identified to be inhibited during general anesthesia [98, 100, 101, 114].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [100]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Nelson, L. E., Franks, N., Maze, M., Chamberlin, N. L., & Saper, C. B.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Chelsea and Westminster Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Lu, Jun
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-28
Volume
508
Issue
4
Pages
648-662
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2062443617
Cited by
230
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 60292, P50HL060292)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 33987, NS051609, R01NS033987, R01NS051609)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
general anesthesia, anesthetic analgesia, loss of consciousness, GABA-A receptor agonists, ketamine, NMDA receptor antagonists, Fos expression, sleep-wake regulation, ventrolateral preoptic nucleus, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, orexin, arousal system, cholinergic system, monoaminergic systems, antinociception, 6-hydroxydopamine lesion, ibotenic acid lesions
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Anesthesia, Animals, Electroencephalography, Male, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Wakefulness, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review