Cited by 1HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

How PrEP delivery was integrated into public ART clinics in central Uganda: a qualitative analysis of implementation processes

Open access
Wyatt, Monique A., Pisarski, Emily E., Nalumansi, Alisaati, Kasiita, Vicent, Kamusiime, Brenda, Nalukwago, Grace K., Thomas, Dorothy, Muwonge, Timothy R. +4 more·2024·PLOS Global Public Health

Abstract

Tailored delivery strategies are important for optimizing the benefit and overall reach of PrEP in sub-Saharan Africa. An integrated approach of delivering time-limited PrEP in combination with ART to serodifferent couples encourages PrEP use in the HIV-negative partner as a bridge to sustained ART use. Although PrEP has been delivered in ART clinics for many years, the processes involved in integrating PrEP into ART services are not well understood. The Partners PrEP Program was a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial of integrated PrEP and ART delivery for HIV serodifferent couples in 12 public health facilities in central Uganda (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03586128). Using qualitative data, we identified and characterized key implementation processes that explain how PrEP delivery was integrated into existing ART services in the Partners PrEP Program. In-depth interviews were conducted with a purposefully-selected sub-sample of 83 members of 42 participating serodifferent couples, and with 36 health care providers implementing integrated delivery. High quality training, technical supervision, and teamwork were identified as key processes supporting providers to implement PrEP delivery. Interest in the PrEP program was promoted through the numerous ways health care providers made integrated ART and PrEP meaningful for serodifferent couples, including tailored counseling messages, efforts to build confidence in integrated delivery, and strategies to create demand for PrEP. Couples in the qualitative sample responded positively to providers’ efforts to promote the integrated strategy. HIV-negative partners initiated PrEP to preserve their relationships, which inspired their partners living with HIV to recommit to ART adherence. Lack of disclosure among couples and poor retention on PrEP were identified as barriers to implementation of the PrEP program. A greater emphasis on understanding the meaning of PrEP for users and its contribution to implementation promises to strengthen future research on PrEP scale up in sub-Saharan Africa.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002916

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wyatt et al. 2024 was designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.

    “The study was designed as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial.”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Methods (‘Study background and design’) describe the Partners PrEP Program as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial. Wyatt et al. 2024, however, is a qualitative study nested within that trial, not the trial itself. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The stepped-wedge design in Wyatt et al. 2024 was chosen to allow for the staggered implementation of the intervention across the different facilities.

    “The stepped-wedge design was chosen to allow for the staggered implementation of the intervention across the different facilities”

    From Applications and implementation considerations for stepped-wedge designs in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Methods section (‘Study background and design’; page not provided) identifies the Partners PrEP Program as a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial in 12 public health facilities. Our copy does not say that this design was chosen to allow staggered implementation across facilities; that stated reason for the choice is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]WHO. Guidelines on when to start antiretroviral therapy and on pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241509565 26598776
  2. [2]WHO. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: Recommendations for a public health approach, 2nd edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549684 27466667
  3. [22]National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences. Qualitative methods in implementation science. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health: Bethesda; 2018: 1– 20. Available from: https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/sites/default/files/2020-09/nci-dccps-implementationscience-whitepaper.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyatt, M. A., Pisarski, E. E., Nalumansi, A., Kasiita, V., Kamusiime, B., Nalukwago, G. K., Thomas, D., Muwonge, T. R., Mujugira, A., Heffron, R., Ware, N. C., & for the Partners PrEP Program Study Team
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Infectious Diseases Institute (UG)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wyatt, Monique A.
Venue
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2024-03-07
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
e0002916
ISSN
2767-3375 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392544827
Cited by
1
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLOS Global Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH110296)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
HIV PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis, implementation process, health professions education, technical supervision, PrEP retention, HIV status disclosure, antiretroviral therapy adherence, HIV prevention scale-up, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review