Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 612

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Human Monoclonal Antibody Combination against SARS Coronavirus: Synergy and Coverage of Escape Mutants

Open access
ter Meulen, Jan, van den Brink, Edward N, Poon, Leo L. M, Marissen, Wilfred E, Leung, Cynthia S. W, Cox, Freek, Cheung, Chung Y, Bakker, Arjen Q, Bogaards, Johannes A, van Deventer, Els, Preiser, Wolfgang, Doerr, Hans Wilhelm, Chow, Vincent T, de Kruif, John, Peiris, Joseph S. M, Goudsmit, Jaap·2006·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Experimental animal data show that protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection with human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is feasible. For an effective immune prophylaxis in humans, broad coverage of different strains of SARS-CoV and control of potential neutralization escape variants will be required. Combinations of virus-neutralizing, noncompeting mAbs may have these properties. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Human mAb CR3014 has been shown to completely prevent lung pathology and abolish pharyngeal shedding of SARS-CoV in infected ferrets. We generated in vitro SARS-CoV variants escaping neutralization by CR3014, which all had a single P462L mutation in the glycoprotein spike (S) of the escape virus. In vitro experiments confirmed that binding of CR3014 to a recombinant S fragment (amino acid residues 318-510) harboring this mutation was abolished. We therefore screened an antibody-phage library derived from blood of a convalescent SARS patient for antibodies complementary to CR3014. A novel mAb, CR3022, was identified that neutralized CR3014 escape viruses, did not compete with CR3014 for binding to recombinant S1 fragments, and bound to S1 fragments derived from the civet cat SARS-CoV-like strain SZ3. No escape variants could be generated with CR3022. The mixture of both mAbs showed neutralization of SARS-CoV in a synergistic fashion by recognizing different epitopes on the receptor-binding domain. Dose reduction indices of 4.5 and 20.5 were observed for CR3014 and CR3022, respectively, at 100% neutralization. Because enhancement of SARS-CoV infection by subneutralizing antibody concentrations is of concern, we show here that anti-SARS-CoV antibodies do not convert the abortive infection of primary human macrophages by SARS-CoV into a productive one. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of two noncompeting human mAbs CR3014 and CR3022 potentially controls immune escape and extends the breadth of protection. At the same time, synergy between CR3014 and CR3022 may allow for a lower total antibody dose to be administered for passive immune prophylaxis of SARS-CoV infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030237

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 612

Metadata

Authors
ter Meulen, J., van den Brink, E. N., Poon, L. L. M., Marissen, W. E., Leung, C. S. W., Cox, F., Cheung, C. Y., Bakker, A. Q., Bogaards, J. A., van Deventer, E., Preiser, W., Doerr, H. W., Chow, V. T., de Kruif, J., Peiris, J. S. M., & Goudsmit, J.
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2006-07-04
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
e237
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2161428851
Cited by
612
References
4
FWCI
6.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Monoclonal Antibody Combination against SARS Coronavirus: Synergy and Coverage of Escape Mutants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030237
The paper
ter Meulen, J., van den Brink, E. N., Poon, L. L. M., Marissen, W. E., Leung, C. S. W., Cox, F., Cheung, C. Y., Bakker, A. Q., Bogaards, J. A., van Deventer, E., Preiser, W., Doerr, H. W., Chow, V. T., de Kruif, J., Peiris, J. S. M., & Goudsmit, J. (2006). Human Monoclonal Antibody Combination against SARS Coronavirus: Synergy and Coverage of Escape Mutants. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030237

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.