The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The GRADE System for Rating Clinical Guidelines
Open accessAbstract
The Policy Forum allows health policy makers around the world to discuss challenges and opportunities for improving health
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to rate the quality of the body of evidence presented in this meta-analysis (27).”
From Optimal Dose and Type of Physical Activity to Improve Glycemic Control in People Diagnosed With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [27]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock
Rivers, E., Nguyen, B., Havstad, S., Ressler, J., Muzzin, A., Knoblich, B., Peterson, E., & Tomlanovich, M. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa010307 · Cited by 10,743 · cited 1×
“, on the basis of the protocol of a commonly cited single-centre study”
BackgroundIntensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977 · cited 1×
“. No evidence exists for moderate glucose control in this context, whereas the value of tight control was supported by one single-centre randomized controlled trial (RCT)”
BackgroundGrading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477 · cited 5×
“Given also that the GRADE criteria are conveyed as ‘‘explicit and clear’’ [6], there should be little need for intensive methodological consultation from the GRADE group when experts produce guidelines.”
BackgroundInfluentialDellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Carlet, J. M., Bion, J., Parker, M. M., Jaeschke, R., Reinhart, K., Angus, D. C., Brun‐Buisson, C., Beale, R. J., et al. (2007) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0934-2 · Cited by 6,789
Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119 · cited 1×
“14) [24].”
Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU
Van den Berghe, G., Wilmer, A., Hermans, G., Meersseman, W., Wouters, P. J., Milants, I., Van Wijngaerden, E., Bobbaers, H., & Bouillon, R. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa052521 · Cited by 3,639 · cited 2×
“, intensive insulin therapy) in most intensive care unit (ICU) patients [18–21].”
BackgroundResultSurviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock
Dellinger, R. P., Carlet, J. M., Masur, H., Gerlach, H., Calandra, T., Cohen, J., Gea‐Banacloche, J., Keh, D., Marshall, J. C., Parker, M. M., et al. (2004) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-004-2210-z · Cited by 3,309
What is ‘quality of evidence’ and why is it important to clinicians?
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be · Cited by 3,250
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Guyatt, G. H. (1993) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.270.17.2096 · Cited by 3,083
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock
Dellinger, R. P., Carlet, J. M., Masur, H., Gerlach, H., Calandra, T., Cohen, J., Gea‐Banacloche, J., Keh, D., Marshall, J. C., Parker, M. M., et al. (2004) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000117317.18092.e4 · Cited by 3,038 · cited 4×
“In 2004 the SSC guidelines recommended that for serious sepsis, intravenous antibiotic therapy should be rapidly instituted [10]; this guideline was given a grade ‘‘E.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 246
Pain and Delirium in Critical Illness: An Exploration of Key 2018 SCCM PADIS Guideline Evidence Gaps
Pisani, M. A., Devlin, J. W., & Skrobik, Y. K. (2019) · Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1698809 · Cited by 17
The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomization Bias in 15 Physical Therapy Journals: A Methods Review
Riley, S. P., Swanson, B. T., Shaffer, S. M., Sawyer, S. F., & Cleland, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.10491 · Cited by 16
The limitations of evidence-based medicine compel the practice of personalized medicine
Einav, S., & O'Connor, M. C. (2024) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-024-07528-y · Cited by 17
“…in literature that is currently considered our best evidence leads to the conclusion so succinctly stated by the late Kavanagh that “…it is not clear that the opinion of a conscientious, judicious, well-educated and experienced clinician would necessarily be inferior to a systemized opinion” [22].”
Forrester, J. D., Bauman, Z. M., Cole, P. A., Edwards, J. G., Knight, A. W., LaRoque, M. C., Raffa, T., White, T. W., & Kartiko, S. (2023) · The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000004083 · Cited by 14
Hu, C., Xia, Y., Zeng, D., Ye, M., & Mei, T. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-59386-9 · Cited by 15
“The certainty of evidence was evaluated following the GRADE guidelines 28 .”
Critiques of the Cass Review: Fact-Checking the Peer-Reviewed and Grey Literature
McDeavitt, K., Cohn, J., & Levine, S. B. (2025) · Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy · doi:10.1080/0092623x.2025.2455133 · Cited by 14
“, 2009 ) . t h e G r a D e f r a m e w o r k i s w i d e l y s u pp o r t e d b y e B M e x p e r t s ( G u y a tt e t a l ., 2015 ) , a f a c t w h i c h t h e y a l e C r i t i q u e a c k n o w l e d g e s e l s e w h e r e i n t h e d o c u m e n t . t h e y a l e C r i t i q u e ’ s i m p l i…”
InfluentialAn Antimicrobial Treatment Assessment of Serratia marcescens Bacteremia and Endocarditis
Slain, D., Howard, C. A., & Cooper, C. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Antibiotics · doi:10.3389/frabi.2022.942721 · Cited by 14
“guidance document provides “suggested approaches” based on clinical experience, expert opinion, and a review of the available literature, rather than using evidence-based grading criteria like GRADE or the US Public Health criteria (Kavanagh, 2009).”
MethodKrishan, S., Dhiman, R. K., Kalra, N., Sharma, R., Baijal, S. S., Arora, A., Gulati, A., Eapan, A., Verma, A. K., Keshava, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2019.07.005 · Cited by 14
Simonassi, F., Ball, L., Badenes, R., Millone, M., Citerio, G., Zona, G., Pelosi, P. P., & Robba, C. (2020) · Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/ana.0000000000000679 · Cited by 13
Andersson, E. M., Sandsveden, M., Forsgard, N., Sällsten, G., Manjer, J., Engström, G., & Barregård, L. (2021) · Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0181 · Cited by 13
KONES, R. J., Rumana, U., & Merino, J. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.925438 · Cited by 13
Development of clinical guidelines for inborn errors of metabolism: Commentary
Vockley, J., Chapman, K. A., & Arnold, G. L. (2013) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.01.013 · Cited by 13
“Anothermethod is the GRADE systemwhich divides evidence into the categories of high, medium, low, and very low quality (or the chance of changing practice based on findings) [2].”
BackgroundCanaud, B., Busink, E., Apel, C., & Bowry, S. K. (2018) · Blood Purification · doi:10.1159/000487918 · Cited by 13
Australasian hidradenitis suppurativa management guidelines
Frew, J. W., Smith, A. D., Fernández‐Peñas, P., Ellis, E., Foley, P. T., Rubel, D. M., McMeniman, E., Marshman, G., Saunders, H., Veysey, E. C., et al. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ajd.14388 · Cited by 12
Evidence-based practice in critical care
Terblanche, M., & Scales, D. C. (2016) · doi:10.1093/med/9780199600830.003.0023 · Cited by 12
Annane, D., Pastores, S. M., Rochwerg, B. N., Arlt, W., Ra, B., Beishuizen, A., Briegel, J., Carcillo, J. A., Christ‐Crain, M., Cooper, M. S., et al. (2018) · Yearbook of pediatric endocrinology · doi:10.1530/ey.15.8.10 · Cited by 12
Bisschop, A., & van Tulder, M. W. (2016) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4606-1 · Cited by 11
Schmidt, M. G., Salgado, C. D., Freeman, K. D., John, J. F., Cantey, J. R., Sharpe, P. A., & Michels, H. T. (2018) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2018.02.007 · Cited by 11
Forrester, J. D., Bukur, M., Dvorak, J. E., Faliks, B. T., Hindin, D. I., Kartiko, S., Kheirbek, T., Lin, L. Y.-C., Manasa, M., Martin, T. J., et al. (2022) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2022.025 · Cited by 11
“For qualitative synthesis, quality and certainty of published evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) definitions [20,21].”
Rosenberg, D. M., Ghayur, H., Deonarain, D. M., Sarohia, G. S., Phillips, M., Garg, S. J., Bakri, S. J., Wykoff, C. C., & Chaudhary, V. (2021) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000520220 · Cited by 11
Richard, E., Morin, J., Murji, A., Lemyre, M., Laberge, P. Y., & Maheux‐Lacroix, S. (2022) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000004811 · Cited by 10
Campbell, R. G., Zadro, J. R., Gamble, A. R., Chan, C. L., Mackey, M., Osie, G., Png, L. H., Douglas, R. G., & Pappas, E. (2024) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/ohn.892 · Cited by 10
McCullough, R. W. (2018) · Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice · doi:10.1177/1078155218758864 · Cited by 10
Kruger, S. Z., Bronskill, S. E., Jeffs, L. P., Steinberg, M., Morris, A. M., & Bell, C. M. (2020) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2020.214 · Cited by 10
Multifidus atrophy and/or dysfunction following lumbar radiofrequency ablation: A systematic review
Francio, V. T., Glicksman, M., Leavitt, L., Gill, B., Shah, A. S., Westerhaus, B. D., Lam, C. M., & D'Souza, R. S. (2024) · PM&R · doi:10.1002/pmrj.13202 · Cited by 9
“29 Upon completion of the assessment of risk of bias and quality assessment, all authors reviewed the results for unani-mous conclusions.”
Clinical vs. statistical significance: considerations for clinical laboratories
Hakan, H., Tran, M. T. C., Markus, C., Ho, C. S., Loh, T. P., Zakaria, R., Cooke, B. R., Theodorsson, E., & Greaves, R. F. (2025) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2025-0219 · Cited by 10
“Several publications [59 – 61] and books [62, 63] have subsequently elucidated this fi eld of evidence-based medicine, including the GRADE system [64, 65].”
Sui, S., & Wang, M. (2025) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2025.106001 · Cited by 10
Vaz, J. M. D. A., Alves, B. M. C. S., Duarte, D. B., Marques, L. A. M., & Santana, R. S. (2021) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/03331024211037297 · Cited by 9
“This finding suggests that the issue of disagreement on which grading system should be elected as the gold standard,which arouses concern over the validity of any grading system, remains unresolved (46).”
BackgroundInfections and Smartphone Use in Nursing Practice: A Systematic Review
Mario, S. D., Dionisi, S., Simone, E. D., Liquori, G., Cianfrocca, C., Muzio, M. D., & Giannetta, N. (2022) · Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing · doi:10.54614/fnjn.2022.21190 · Cited by 9
“A qualitative evaluation of the evidence related to the individual outcomes was conducted (GRADE Handbook) (Kavanagh, 2009).”
MethodD'Souza, R. S., ElSaban, M., Alvarez, G. A. M., Jin, M. Y., Kubrova, E., & Hassett, L. C. (2023) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1093/pm/pnad091 · Cited by 9
Cancelliere, C., Yu, H., Southerst, D., Connell, G. P., Verville, L., Bussières, A., Gross, D. P., Pereira, P., Mior, S. A., Tricco, A. C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation · doi:10.1007/s10926-023-10140-4 · Cited by 10
“GRADE focuses on intervention effectiveness, is used to classify the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines, and is endorsed by organizations around the world [67].”
BackgroundRole of closed loop stimulation pacing (CLS) in vasovagal syncope
Ruzieh, M., Ammari, Z. A., Dasa, O., Karim, S., & Grubb, B. P. (2017) · Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology · doi:10.1111/pace.13194 · Cited by 9
Pharmacist authorship on clinical practice guidelines
Thompkins, A. W., Norman, B. F., Hill, B. K., Antosz, K., & Bookstaver, P. B. (2018) · JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY · doi:10.1002/jac5.1056 · Cited by 10
“of rating systems have been utilized with varying reliability and reproducibility.(8,9) Most recently, the Grades of Recommendation, Assess-”
MethodParker, L. M. (2017) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 9
Forrester, J. D., Faliks, B. T., Cardarelli, C. L., Choudhry, M. S., Patel, B. M., Ricaurte, D., Sarani, B., Sfakianos, M. G., Kartiko, S., & Huston, J. M. (2023) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2023.086 · Cited by 8
“10,11 Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject the recommendation.”
Pan, Q., Zheng, S., & He, P. (2025) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1038/s41390-025-04325-1 · Cited by 8
The importance of clinical pathways and protocols in pediatric nephrology
Mammen, C., Matsell, D., & Lemley, K. (2014) · Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, West) · doi:10.1007/s00467-013-2577-6 · Cited by 10
“Such concerns had earlier led to the development of the GRADE approach to evaluating clinical evidence [22] (used by KDIGO, the Cochrane Collaboration, and the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, among other organizations), which has recently been questioned [23].”
MethodKrinsley, J. S. (2014) · Hospital Practice · doi:10.3810/hp.2014.04.1099 · Cited by 8
Bautista-Orduno, K. G., Dorsey-Treviño, E. G., González‐González, J. G., Castillo-Gonzalez, D. A., García-Leal, M., Raygoza-Cortez, K., Gionfriddo, M. R., & Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, R. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.02.010 · Cited by 8
Chaput, E., Gross, A., Stewart, R., Nadeau, G., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2011) · Physiotherapy Canada · doi:10.3138/ptc.2010-54 · Cited by 8
Perioperative Resuscitation and Life Support (PeRLS): An Update
Moitra, V. K., Banerjee, A., Ben-Jacob, T. K., Cortegiani, A., Einav, S., Gitman, M., Ippolito, M., Klock, P. A., Lakbar, I., Maccioli, G. A., et al. (2025) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000005728 · Cited by 7
Xie, M., Qiu, Y., Wang, M., Wei, X., Tao, Y., Duan, A., Shang, J., Gao, W., & Wang, Z. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.018 · Cited by 8
Einav, S., Kaufman, N., & O'Connor, M. C. (2015) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000560 · Cited by 7
Wu, X. Y., Chung, V. C., Wong, C. H. L., Yip, B. H. K., Cheung, W. K. W., & Wu, J. C. Y. (2018) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2018.10.008 · Cited by 7
Pain, Analgesic Effectiveness, and Long-Term Opioid Dependency
Skrobik, Y. K., & Flood, P. D. (2019) · Lessons from the ICU · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24250-3_15 · Cited by 7
Wang, T., Huang, J., Shang, Z., Deng, M., Su, J., Duan, X., & Kong, D. (2025) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-025-01637-7 · Cited by 6
“We used odds ratios (ORs) as an effect value for dichotomous outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMD) as an effect value for continuous outcomes, both with 95% con fi dence intervals (CIs).”
Management of Liver Injuries: The Panamerican Trauma Society 2018 Consensus Guidelines
Ottolino, P., Pust, G. D., Peck, G., & Razek, T. S. (2014) · Panamerican Journal of Trauma Critical Care & Emergency Surgery · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1247 · Cited by 6
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
Jericevic, D., Cervantes, I. A., Nwaba, A. U. A., Thibault, M. D., & Siddique, M. (2024) · Urogynecology · doi:10.1097/spv.0000000000001593 · Cited by 6
Leung, J., Leong, J., Yeung, K. A., Hao, B. Z., McCluskey, A., Kayani, Y., Davidson, B. R., & Gurusamy, K. S. (2021) · Updates in Surgery · doi:10.1007/s13304-021-01168-3 · Cited by 6
“This is done to provide the guideline users a sense with information on the reliability and quality of the guidelines [11].”
BackgroundInfluentialScience and Evidence: Separating Fact from Fiction
HESS, D. R. (2013) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.4187/respcare.02591 · Cited by 6
Surgical treatment for cryptoglandular and Crohn’s perianal fistulas: Protocol of an umbrella review
Mei, Z., Qin, F., Du, P., Li, B., Fang, C., Gu, J., Li, Y., Zhou, H., Shao, Z., Ge, M., et al. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251460 · Cited by 6
Forrester, J. D., Colling, K. P., Diaz, J. J., Faliks, B. T., Kim, P. K., Tessier, J. M., Tung, J. T., & Huston, J. M. (2021) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2021.126 · Cited by 6
“The GRADE framework was applied to all quantified outcomes for assessment for risk of bias, publication inconsistency, imprecision, and indirectness [7].”
Endometrial scratching can be offered outside clinical research setting: let us show you why
Vitagliano, A., Sardo, A. D. S., Noventa, M., Carugno, J. A., Cicinelli, E., Pacheco, L. A., Vitale, S. G., Campo, R., Laganà, A. S., Haimovich, S., et al. (2021) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deab060 · Cited by 6
Leal, M. D. C. F., Castro, M. M. L., & Sosthenes, M. C. K. (2022) · European Journal of Dentistry · doi:10.1055/s-0042-1757209 · Cited by 5
“31 This tool aimed to summarize the evidencetracked, based on thefour stepsand considering the riskof bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision focusing on the certainty of evidence among included studies in the systematic review.”
Bousi, S.-E., Zachiotis, M., Papapanou, M., Frountzas, M., Symeonidis, D., Raptis, D. G., Papaziogas, B., Toutouzas, K. G., Felekouras, E. S., & Schizas, D. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13216303 · Cited by 6
“The evaluation of study quality and grading of recommendations were conducted , and Evaluation” (GRADE) approach [67].”
MethodWrong guidelines: how to detect them and what to do in the case of flawed recommendations
Iannone, P., Costantino, G., Montano, N., Podda, G. M., Minardi, M., Doyle, J., & Cartabellotta, A. (2016) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/ebmed-2016-110607 · Cited by 5
“Furthermore, there is the potential to create a serious obstacle to otherwise necessary research.(20) The scientific organisation producing that suspicious guideline should be notified and medicolegal value of that guideline downgraded.”
BackgroundKeane, M. J., & Berg, C. (2017) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aex334 · Cited by 5
The use of GRADE approach in Cochrane reviews of TCM was insufficient: a cross-sectional survey
Wang, Q., Xiao, Y., Guo, T., Zhu, H., Li, J., Lai, H., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., Liu, Y., Yang, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.11.004 · Cited by 5
Practical guidelines and apps for improvement of guideline implementation
Bischoff, S. C., Cuerda, C., & Barazzoni, R. (2020) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2020.07.031 · Cited by 5
Chang, J., Lei, Z., Ma, P., Cui, J., & Zhu, W. (2025) · BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01384-z · Cited by 5
Zafar, S., Habboush, Y. Y., & Beidas, S. (2018) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/10347 · Cited by 4
“GRADE has been adopted by many organizations including the World Health Organization, American College of Physicians, The Endocrine Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, UpToDate, and other domestic and international organizations [2].”
MethodSelvaggi, G., Andréasson, M., & Georgas, K. (2018) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000005114 · Cited by 4
Brull, S. J., & Eriksson, L. I. (2020) · Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2020.01.004 · Cited by 4
Guidelines in Gastroenterology: Careful Interpretation Is Essential
Correia, C., Almeida, N., & Figueiredo, P. (2021) · GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1159/000518322 · Cited by 4
Superiority of sugammadex in preventing postoperative pulmonary complications
Liu, H., Luo, R., Cao, S.-J., Zheng, B., Ye, L., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000002381 · Cited by 4
“GradingofRecommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to analyze the quality of evidence for outcomes derived from the same research type.([22])”
MethodLi, X.-J., Xia, H., Yu, G.-H., Hu, Y., & Zhu, F. (2025) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2025.102004 · Cited by 3
Xiong, Q., Duan, X.-L., & He, P.-W. (2026) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.21035 · Cited by 3
“Evidence certainty was graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework ( Kavanagh, 2009 ), which considers methodological limitations, consistency, indirectness, imprecision, and risk of publication bias.”
Tan, L., Chinnappa, S., Tan, D. K., & Hall, A. S. (2011) · Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy · doi:10.1586/erc.11.105 · Cited by 3
Winterstein, A. G., Ewig, C. L. Y., Wang, Y., Smolinski, N. E., Toyserkani, G. A., LaCivita, C., Lackey, L. G., Eggers, S. L., Zhou, E. H., Diaby, V., et al. (2024) · Drug Safety · doi:10.1007/s40264-024-01488-4 · Cited by 3
Sorg, M. E., & McHenry, K. L. (2025) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.1089/respcare.12478 · Cited by 3
“9 This approach provides the reader with an understanding of how strong the evidence is in providing the recommendation.”
Kurmis, R., Aromataris, E., & Greenwood, J. (2013) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2013-1134 · Cited by 3
Ramos-Munell, J., Gallardo‐Gómez, D., Álvarez‐Barbosa, F., Alfonso‐Rosa, R. M., Reilly, J. J., Okely, A. D., Cruz, B. D. P., & del Pozo-Cruz, J. (2025) · European Early Childhood Education Research Journal · doi:10.1080/1350293x.2025.2487929 · Cited by 3
“The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to rate the quality of evidence presented in this meta-analysis (Kavanagh 2009).”
International Clinical Practice Guidelines
Postelnicu, R., Rhodes, A., & Evans, L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73506-1_7 · Cited by 3
Clinical Practice Guidelines in Anesthesiology: Adjusting Our Expectations
Neuman, M. D., & Apfelbaum, J. L. (2021) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003809 · Cited by 3
Indoor tanning: Evidence surrounding advertised health claims
Laughter, M. R., Anderson, J. B., Aguilera, M. N., Sadeghpour, M., & Pugliano‐Mauro, M. A. (2021) · Clinics in Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2021.08.015 · Cited by 2
Álvarez‐Barbosa, F., Ramos-Munell, J., del Pozo-Cruz, J., Cruz, B. D. P., Ceballos-Sánchez, J. L., & Gallardo‐Gómez, D. (2025) · Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11154-025-10005-6 · Cited by 3
Shin, E.-S., Jang, J.-E., Yeon, J.-Y., Kim, D.-S., Chang, S., & Lee, Y. S. (2018) · Journal of Korean Medical Science · doi:10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e79 · Cited by 2
Disparities between randomized clinical trial participants and sepsis patients in real-world
Bai, X., Zeng, P., Wang, B., Zhang, Z., Jin, X., Kang, Y., Cheng, Y., & Wu, Q. (2023) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2023.154362 · Cited by 3
Mumtaz, S., McMinn, M., Cole, C., Gao, C., Hall, C., Guignard‐Duff, M., Huang, H., McAllister, D., Morales, D. R., Jefferson, E., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/52385 · Cited by 3
“In principle, guideline developers following GRADE [11] already consider applicability as part of the assessment of indirectness.”
InfluentialVoznyuk, S., Carter, R. Z., & Ridley, J. (2024) · Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/02692163241286658 · Cited by 2
“3,4 This allows for nuance when high-quality studies are associated with burdensome therapy or low-quality studies with improved patient satisfaction.”
Strength of evidence and handling uncertainty: practical considerations and general observations
Bedford, M. R., Pettersen, K., & Minhas, R. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.024 · Cited by 2
“For example, its application in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines relating to how the weighting of individual recommendations based on expert opinion on sepsis may differ from that derived by a GRADE process [15].”
MethodClinical Trial Design Methodology for Pain Outcome Studies
Vetter, T. R., & Chou, R. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-08340-9.00080-3 · Cited by 2
Masse, V., Edmond, M. B., & Diekema, D. J. (2017) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.07.030 · Cited by 2
Another oral cancer clinical guideline - but does it propose changes to dental practice?
Crossan, L., & Conway, D. I. (2019) · Evidence-Based Dentistry · doi:10.1038/s41432-019-0005-x · Cited by 2
Piette, V. E., Cohen, J., Deliëns, L., Pauwels, N., ten Bosch, J. V. D. W., & Beernaert, K. (2019) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1059-8 · Cited by 2
Divens, L. L., & Rivera, S. L. (2022) · Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2022.04.010 · Cited by 2
Sax, O. C., Chen, Z., Mont, M. A., & Delanois, R. E. (2022) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.001 · Cited by 2
Riley, S. P., Swanson, B. T., Shaffer, S. M., Sawyer, S. F., & Cleland, J. A. (2022) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1080/10669817.2022.2041285 · Cited by 2
“[5], and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale [6] to critically appraise randomized clinical trials (RCTs), important considerations are whether the research questions were generated prospectively and if the authors subsequently followed their prospective intent when analyzing and interpreting the data [7].”
BackgroundMaking the GRADE: Providing Clinical Practice Guidance to the European Association of Urology
Canfield, S. E., Omar, M. I., & Ribal, M. J. (2023) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.006 · Cited by 2
Tahmazov, E., Blachier, A., Nabbé, P., Guillou-Landréat, M., Walter, M., & Lemey, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1359764 · Cited by 1
Hosseeini, S. M., Jafari, M., Tahmasebi, M., & Adibi, P. (2024) · International Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_284_22 · Cited by 1
“[4,8] Thirty‑five eligible members of the Isfahan Association of Adult Gastroenterology and Hepatology were enrolled by a census of all available people and the people participated voluntarily for the survey.”
BackgroundLi, X. C., Li, X., Zhu, X., Xin, X., Sheng, R., Wang, T., Kan, J.-M., & Huang, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1582661 · Cited by 1
“In this study, the certainty of evidence was systematically evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework (Kavanagh, 2009).”
Zheng, S., Pan, Q., & Chen, L. (2025) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2025.106117 · Cited by 1
Kontogiannis, A., Papapanou, M., Kalouta, N., Syristatidi, K., & Siristatidis, C. S. (2026) · Journal of Reproductive Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jri.2026.104836 · Cited by 1
Bai, P., Xiong, Q., & Wu, T. (2026) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2026.103842 · Cited by 1
Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Yi, Y., Zhan, H., Chen, H., & Song, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1775358 · Cited by 1
Yang, H., Rao, Y., & Chen, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2026.1905191 · Cited by 1
“The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework (Kavanagh, 2009).”
Paul, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78966-8_2 · Cited by 1
Bur, A. M., & Rosenfeld, R. M. (2019) · Otolaryngology · doi:10.1177/0194599819846458 · Cited by 1
Pseudoscience and attacks on transgender people
Murib, Z. (2025) · European Journal of Politics and Gender · doi:10.1332/25151088y2025d000000095 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Kavanagh, B. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Kavanagh, Brian P.
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1000094
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- PMC
- PMC2735782
- OpenAlex
- W1991363364
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- American Thoracic Society
- World Health Organization
- University of Pennsylvania
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons
- European Respiratory Society
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Socialstyrelsen
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- GRADE system, guideline quality assessment, evidence-based medicine, health policy
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Sepsis, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review