Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Six-Gene Signature Predicts Survival of Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Open access
Stratford, Jeran K., Bentrem, David J., Anderson, Judy M., Fan, Cheng, Volmar, Keith A., Marron, J. S., Routh, Elizabeth D., Caskey, Laura S., Samuel, Jonathan C., Der, Channing J., Thorne, Leigh B., Calvo, Benjamin F., Kim, Hong Jin, Talamonti, Mark S., Iacobuzio-Donahue, Christine A., Hollingsworth, Michael A., Perou, Charles M., Yeh, Jen Jen·2010·PLoS Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a lethal disease. For patients with localized PDAC, surgery is the best option, but with a median survival of less than 2 years and a difficult and prolonged postoperative course for most, there is an urgent need to better identify patients who have the most aggressive disease. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed the gene expression profiles of primary tumors from patients with localized compared to metastatic disease and identified a six-gene signature associated with metastatic disease. We evaluated the prognostic potential of this signature in a training set of 34 patients with localized and resected PDAC and selected a cut-point associated with outcome using X-tile. We then applied this cut-point to an independent test set of 67 patients with localized and resected PDAC and found that our signature was independently predictive of survival and superior to established clinical prognostic factors such as grade, tumor size, and nodal status, with a hazard ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-10.0). Patients defined to be high-risk patients by the six-gene signature had a 1-year survival rate of 55% compared to 91% in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Our six-gene signature may be used to better stage PDAC patients and assist in the difficult treatment decisions of surgery and to select patients whose tumor biology may benefit most from neoadjuvant therapy. The use of this six-gene signature should be investigated in prospective patient cohorts, and if confirmed, in future PDAC clinical trials, its potential as a biomarker should be investigated. Genes in this signature, or the pathways that they fall into, may represent new therapeutic targets. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000307

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Stratford, J. K., Bentrem, D. J., Anderson, J. M., Fan, C., Volmar, K. A., Marron, J. S., Routh, E. D., Caskey, L. S., Samuel, J. C., Der, C. J., Thorne, L. B., Calvo, B. F., Kim, H. J., Talamonti, M. S., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Hollingsworth, M. A., Perou, C. M., & Yeh, J. J.
Venue
PLoS Medicine
Published
2010-07-13
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
e1000307
ISSN
  • 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-1676
OpenAlex
W2048867608
Cited by
244
References
5
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Six-Gene Signature Predicts Survival of Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000307
The paper
Stratford, J. K., Bentrem, D. J., Anderson, J. M., Fan, C., Volmar, K. A., Marron, J. S., Routh, E. D., Caskey, L. S., Samuel, J. C., Der, C. J., Thorne, L. B., Calvo, B. F., Kim, H. J., Talamonti, M. S., Iacobuzio-Donahue, C. A., Hollingsworth, M. A., Perou, C. M., & Yeh, J. J. (2010). A Six-Gene Signature Predicts Survival of Patients with Localized Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.