The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Severe Maternal Sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: A National Case-Control Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: In light of increasing rates and severity of sepsis worldwide, this study aimed to estimate the incidence of, and describe the causative organisms, sources of infection, and risk factors for, severe maternal sepsis in the UK. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A prospective case-control study included 365 confirmed cases of severe maternal sepsis and 757 controls from all UK obstetrician-led maternity units from June 1, 2011, to May 31, 2012. Incidence of severe sepsis was 4.7 (95% CI 4.2-5.2) per 10,000 maternities; 71 (19.5%) women developed septic shock; and five (1.4%) women died. Genital tract infection (31.0%) and the organism Escherichia coli (21.1%) were most common. Women had significantly increased adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of severe sepsis if they were black or other ethnic minority (aOR = 1.82; 95% CI 1.82-2.51), were primiparous (aOR = 1.60; 95% CI 1.17-2.20), had a pre-existing medical problem (aOR = 1.40; 95% CI 1.01-1.94), had febrile illness or were taking antibiotics in the 2 wk prior to presentation (aOR = 12.07; 95% CI 8.11-17.97), or had an operative vaginal delivery (aOR = 2.49; 95% CI 1.32-4.70), pre-labour cesarean (aOR = 3.83; 95% CI 2.24-6.56), or cesarean after labour onset (aOR = 8.06; 95% CI 4.65-13.97). Median time between delivery and sepsis was 3 d (interquartile range = 1-7 d). Multiple pregnancy (aOR = 5.75; 95% CI 1.54-21.45) and infection with group A streptococcus (aOR = 4.84; 2.17-10.78) were associated with progression to septic shock; for 16 (50%) women with a group A streptococcal infection there was <2 h-and for 24 (75%) women, <9 h-between the first sign of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and a diagnosis of severe sepsis. A limitation of this study was the proportion of women with sepsis without an identified organism or infection source (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: For each maternal sepsis death, approximately 50 women have life-threatening morbidity from sepsis. Follow-up to ensure infection is eradicated is important. The rapid progression to severe sepsis highlights the importance of following the international Surviving Sepsis Campaign guideline of early administration of high-dose intravenous antibiotics within 1 h of admission to hospital for anyone with suspected sepsis. Signs of severe sepsis in peripartum women, particularly with confirmed or suspected group A streptococcal infection, should be regarded as an obstetric emergency. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone, R. C., Balk, R. A., Cerra, F. B., Dellinger, R. P., Fein, A. M., Knaus, W. A., Schein, R. M. H., & Sibbald, W. J. (1992) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.101.6.1644 · Cited by 13,198
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup*, Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., et al. (2013) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8 · Cited by 7,290
WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review
Khan, K. S., Wojdyla, D., Say, L., Gülmezoglu, A. M., & Van Look, P. F. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68397-9 · Cited by 3,978
Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006–2008
(2011) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02847.x · Cited by 2,994
Waterstone, M., Murphy, J. D., Bewley, S., & Wolfe, C. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1089 · Cited by 552
Saving Mothers’ Lives. Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008: Correspondence
Wilkinson, H., & Advisers, O. B. O. T. T. A. M. (2011) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03097.x · Cited by 512
Kinasewitz, G. T., Yan, S. B., Basson, B., Comp, P., Russell, J. A., Cariou, A., Um, S. L., Utterback, B., Laterre, P.-F., Dhainaut, J.-F., et al. (2004) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc2459 · Cited by 363
Rise in maternal mortality in the Netherlands
Schutte, J., Steegers, E., Schuitemaker, N., Santema, J., de Boer, K., Pel, M., Vermeulen, G., Visser, W., van Roosmalen, J., & the Netherlands Maternal Mortality Committee (2010) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02382.x · Cited by 263
Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing Maternal Deaths to Make Motherhood Safer
McClure, J. H., Cooper, G. M., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2012) · Survey of Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/sa.0b013e31824bbacd · Cited by 238
Cited by
Daru, J., Zamora, J., Fernández-Félix, B. M., Vogel, J., Oladapo, O. T., Morisaki, N., Tunçalp, Ö., Torloni, M. R., Mittal, S., Jayaratne, K., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30078-0 · Cited by 436
Serum ferritin thresholds for the diagnosis of iron deficiency in pregnancy: A systematic review
Daru, J., Allotey, J., Peña‐Rosas, J. P., & Khan, K. S. (2017) · Transfusion Medicine · doi:10.1111/tme.12408 · Cited by 138
Bauer, M. E., Housey, M., Bauer, S. T., Behrmann, S., Chau, A., Clancy, C., Clark, E. A. S., Einav, S., Langen, E., Leffert, L., et al. (2019) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000003709 · Cited by 89
Morrison, J., Basnet, M., & Sharma, N. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290405 · Cited by 11
Maternal sepsis in Italy: a prospective, population-based cohort and nested case-control study
Ornaghi, S., Maraschini, A., Buoncristiano, M., Corsi Decenti, E., Colciago, E., Cetin, I., Donati, S., & on behalf of the ItOSS-Regional Working Group (2022) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11010105 · Cited by 9
“5 per 10,000 maternities, is slightly higher than a prior, similarly designed, epidemiological work [23].”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Acosta, C. D., Kurinczuk, J. J., Lucas, D. N., Tuffnell, D. J., Sellers, S., Knight, M., & System, O. B. O. T. U. K. O. S.
- Venue
- PLoS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2014-07-08
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e1001672
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2134279239
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe Maternal Sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: A National Case-Control Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001672
- The paper
- Acosta, C. D., Kurinczuk, J. J., Lucas, D. N., Tuffnell, D. J., Sellers, S., Knight, M., & System, O. B. O. T. U. K. O. S. (2014). Severe Maternal Sepsis in the UK, 2011–2012: A National Case-Control Study. PLoS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001672
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.