The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers
Open accessAbstract
Will consumer wearable technology ever be adopted or accepted by the medical community?Patients and practitioners regularly use digital technology (e.g., thermometers and glucose monitors) to identify and discuss symptoms.In addition, a third of general practitioners in the United Kingdom report that patients arrive with suggestions for treatment based on online search results [1].However, consumer health wearables are predicted to become the next "Dr Google."One in six (15%) consumers in the United States currently uses wearable technology, including smartwatches or fitness bands.While 19 million fitness devices are likely to be sold this year, that number is predicted to grow to 110 million in 2018 [2].As the line between consumer health wearables and medical devices begins to blur, it is now possible for a single wearable device to monitor a range of medical risk factors (Fig 1).Potentially, these devices could give patients direct access to personal analytics that can contribute to their health, facilitate preventive care, and aid in the management of ongoing illness.However, how this new wearable technology might best serve medicine remains unclear. Do Wearables Affect Behaviour? Healthy IndividualsAt present, wearables are more likely to be purchased by individuals who already lead a healthy lifestyle and want to quantify their progress [2].The majority of wearable manufacturers (e.g., Fitbit, Jawbone, and Nike) stress the potential of their devices to become an "all-inone" platform for improving physical performance and positive habit formation.Wearable Summary Points• Consumer wearables can provide patients with personalized health data, which could assist with self-diagnosis and behaviour change interventions.• There are a number of concerns about the safety, reliability, and security of using consumer wearables in health care.• Practitioners and researchers should consider how these technological advances may impact health care in the 21st century.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using Pedometers to Increase Physical Activity and Improve Health: A Systematic Review
Bravata, D. M., Smith-Spangler, C., Sundaram, V., Gienger, A. L., Lin, N., Lewis, R., Stave, C. D., Olkin, I., & Sirard, J. R. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.298.19.2296 · Cited by 2,064
Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility
de Montjoye, Y.-A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep01376 · Cited by 1,645
A Review of Accelerometry-Based Wearable Motion Detectors for Physical Activity Monitoring
Yang, C.-C., & Hsu, Y.-L. (2010) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s100807772 · Cited by 1,058
Swan, M. (2012) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan1030217 · Cited by 934 · cited 1×
“A number of scientific and popular publications describe methods and techniques for using consumer wearables as “self-hacking” devices—to improve sleep, manage stress, or increase productivity [12].”
Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial
Christensen, H. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.37945.566632.ee · Cited by 928
Swan, M. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6020492 · Cited by 730
Accuracy of Smartphone Applications and Wearable Devices for Tracking Physical Activity Data
Case, M. A., Burwick, H. A., Volpp, K. G., & Patel, M. S. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.17841 · Cited by 694
Carter, M. C., Burley, V. J., Nykjaer, C., & Cade, J. E. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2283 · Cited by 666 · cited 2×
“Despite their widespread use, these solutions result in a high level of patient attrition [27], which might be a result of requiring patients to delay self-report until they are next able to use their home computer [28].”
BackgroundPersonality and self-esteem as predictors of young people's technology use
Ehrenberg, A., Juckes, S., White, K. M., & Walsh, S. P. (2008) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0030 · Cited by 488
Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors
LEE, J.-M., KIM, Y., & WELK, G. J. (2014) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000287 · Cited by 401
Cited by
Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F., & Wang, J. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y · Cited by 3,373
Deep learning for healthcare: review, opportunities and challenges
Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx044 · Cited by 3,076
Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care
Johnson, K. B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M. E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., Zhao, J., & Snowdon, J. L. (2021) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12884 · Cited by 1,854
Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning
Mohr, D. C., Zhang, M., & Schueller, S. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044949 · Cited by 802
Wearables and the Medical Revolution
Dunn, J., Runge, R., & Snyder, M. (2018) · Personalized Medicine · doi:10.2217/pme-2018-0044 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A.
- Venue
- PLOS Medicine
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e1001953
- ISSN
- 1549-1277 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-1676
- OpenAlex
- W2266982813
- Cited by
- 1,235
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 222.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953
- The paper
- Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The Rise of Consumer Health Wearables: Promises and Barriers. PLOS Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.