Cited by 742Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsHealth, Technology, Consumer Behavior

Emerging Patient-Driven Health Care Models: An Examination of Health Social Networks, Consumer Personalized Medicine and Quantified Self-Tracking

Open access
Swan, Melanie·2009·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

A new class of patient-driven health care services is emerging to supplement and extend traditional health care delivery models and empower patient self-care. Patient-driven health care can be characterized as having an increased level of information flow, transparency, customization, collaboration and patient choice and responsibility-taking, as well as quantitative, predictive and preventive aspects. The potential exists to both improve traditional health care systems and expand the concept of health care though new services. This paper examines three categories of novel health services: health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph6020492

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quantified self movement is the driving force behind wearable technologies involving acquisition of data on daily activities, sport performance, and health status.

    “The “quantified self” movement is the driving force behind wearable technologies involving acquisition of data on daily activities, sport performance, and health status.1”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [1]

    In “Quantified self-tracking,” the paper describes wearable devices with automated collection of activity-related measures, including energy expenditure, and discusses health monitoring. It does not establish that the quantified self movement is the driving force behind wearable technology or specifically identify sport performance as a use. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [10]Wicks P PatientsLikeMe for ALS/MND Presented at the 18th International ALS/MND Symposium Toronto, Canada December 1–3, 2007(http://blog.patientslikeme.com/2007/12/07/patientslikeme-at-the-toronto-alsmnd-symposium).
  2. [27]Tapscott D Williams AD Wikinomics 1st Ed Penguin Group New York, NY, USA 2006 7 9
  3. [28]Charles C Whelan T Gafni A What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? Brit. Med. J 1999 319 780 782 10488014 PMC1116606
  4. [30]Bosworth A A Modest Proposal: New Products and Services to Fix Health Care Presented at the Connected Health Symposium Boston, MA, USA October 28, 2008
  5. [32]Charles C Whelan T Gafni, A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? Brit. Med. J 1999 319 780 782 10488014 PMC1116606
  6. [33]Vogt E Kuperberg J Creating a Partnership Model for Health Education and Health Care Presented at the 1996 Partnerships for Networked Consumer Health Information Conference Racncho Mirage, CA, USA May 12–14, 1996
  7. [35]Millar J A Shared Care Model for Complex Chronic Disease Care: A Community of Practice Presented at the PHSA Navigation Workshop Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada February 23, 2004 9 10
  8. [36]Charles C Whelan T Gafni A What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? Brit. Med. J 1999 319 780 782 10488014 PMC1116606
  9. [38]Waldrop M Science 2.0: Great New Tool, or Great Risk Scientific American 2008 http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0-great-new-tool-or-great-risk(accessed January 9, 2008) 18444327

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swan, M.
Affiliations
Futures Group (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Swan, Melanie
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2009-02-05
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
492-525
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054712596
Cited by
730
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 67 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 64 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 35
FWCI
44.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
Keywords
health social networks, patient self-care, health data transparency, models of care, patient empowerment
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Patient Participation, Patients, Social Support, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review