Cited by 100Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Dirofilaria in Humans, Dogs, and Vectors in Austria (1978–2014)—From Imported Pathogens to the Endemicity of Dirofilaria repens

Open access
Fuehrer, Hans-Peter, Auer, Herbert, Leschnik, Michael, Silbermayr, Katja, Duscher, Georg, Joachim, Anja·2016·PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dirofilaria repens and D. immitis are filarioid helminths with domestic and wild canids as main hosts and mosquitoes as vectors. Both species are known to cause zoonotic diseases, primarily pulmonary (D. immitis), ocular (D. repens), and subcutaneous (D. repens) dirofilariosis. Both D. immitis and D. repens are known as invasive species, and their distribution seems associated with climate change. Until very recently, both species were known to be nonendemic in Austria. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Metadata on introduced and possibly autochthonous cases of infection with Dirofilaria sp. in dogs and humans in Austria are analysed, together with analyses of mosquito populations from Austria in ongoing studies. In Austria, most cases of Dirofilaria sp. in humans (30 cases of D. repens-six ocular and 24 subcutaneous) and dogs (approximately 50 cases-both D. immitis and D. repens) were most likely imported. However, occasionally infections with D. repens were discussed to be autochthonous (one human case and seven in dogs). The introduction of D. repens to Austria was confirmed very recently, as the parasite was detected in Burgenland (eastern Austria) for the first time in mosquito vectors during a surveillance program. For D. immitis, this could not be confirmed yet, but data from Germany suggest that the successful establishment of this nematode species in Austria is a credible scenario for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: The first findings of D. repens in mosquito vectors indicate that D. repens presumably invaded in eastern Austria. Climate analyses from central Europe indicate that D. immitis also has the capacity to establish itself in the lowland regions of Austria, given that both canid and culicid hosts are present.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review compiles Austrian records from 1978–2014 and finds that human and dog Dirofilaria infections were mostly imported, but D. repens was detected in mosquitoes in Burgenland in 2012 and is considered to be establishing in eastern Austria. D. immitis remains nonendemic in Austria, though conditions and neighboring-country data suggest establishment is plausible.

Key findings

  • In humans, 30 D. repens cases were reported since 1978: 24 subcutaneous (80%) and six ocular (20%); 27 patients reported travel to at least one D. repens-endemic country, and one case in Nickelsdorf, Burgenland (2006) was discussed as autochthonous. Three suspected human pulmonary D. immitis cases were serology-positive but not biopsy-confirmed.
  • In dogs, D. repens was detected in 37 dogs, including 26 monoinfections; seven (27%) monoinfections had unclear travel activity, and all potentially autochthonous cases were from eastern Austria. D. immitis was documented in 25 dogs, with 81% of examined dogs having travel history to the Mediterranean and no case suspected as autochthonous.
  • D. repens DNA was first detected in Austrian mosquitoes in 2012 in pools of An. algeriensis in Rust and An. maculipennis complex in Mörbisch, both in Burgenland. No D. repens or D. immitis were observed in screened Austrian foxes (n = 36 eastern Austria; n > 500 western Austria).
  • The authors conclude that D. repens presumably invaded eastern Austria, while D. immitis is not yet endemic but may become established in the near future.

Methods

  • The study summarizes published and unpublished cases of D. repens and D. immitis in dogs, humans, and mosquitoes in Austria. Published cases were identified via NCBI, Scopus, and Google Scholar using keywords “Dirofilaria” and “Austria,” including German-language literature; unpublished cases came from electronic patient databases at the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna.
  • Metadata on introduced and possibly autochthonous infections were analyzed together with ongoing mosquito population studies; fox blood samples from eastern Austria (n = 36) and western Austria (n > 500) were also screened for filarioid helminths.

Limitations

  • The paper states that vector competence of several mosquito species remains unclear because molecular analyses used whole mosquitoes, including the abdomen, which cannot confirm vector competence.
  • The paper states that the three suspected human pulmonary D. immitis cases were not confirmed by invasive biopsy because of the lung location, and that stable establishment of D. repens is still to be seen because all potential autochthonous cases were documented within a relatively short time span.
  • Evident from the text: many human and dog records rely on unpublished patient data, and travel histories were sometimes unclear or not determined, limiting certainty about autochthonous acquisition.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004547

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 49 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    For D. immitis, establishment in Austria could not be confirmed yet.

    “For D. immitis, this could not be confirmed yet”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Of the 30 human D. repens cases in Austria, 24 (80%) were subcutaneous infections and six (20%) ocular lesions.

    “Of these, 24 (80%) were subcutaneous infections and six (20%) ocular lesions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    In September 2006, a 34-year-old border police officer from Nickelsdorf (Burgenland) presented a 1 cm diameter tumor on the right palm after a mosquito bite.

    “In September 2006, a 34-year-old border police officer from Nickelsdorf (Burgenland) presented a “tumor” 1 cm in diameter on the right palm of her hand after a mosquito bite.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] H Auer, 2008, Der erst authochthone Fall einer subkutanen Dirofilariose in Österreich, Wien Klin Wochenschr source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    The introduction of D. repens to Austria was confirmed very recently, as the parasite was detected in Burgenland (eastern Austria) for the first time in mosquito vectors during a surveillance program.

    “The introduction of D. repens to Austria was confirmed very recently, as the parasite was detected in Burgenland (eastern Austria) for the first time in mosquito vectors during a surveillance program.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Since 1978, 30 cases of human dirofilariosis caused by D. repens were reported in Austria.

    “Since 1978, 30 cases of human dirofilariosis caused by D. repens were reported in Austria”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Of the 30 human D. repens cases in Austria, 16 (53%) were in male patients and 14 (47%) in females.

    “16 (53%) in male patients and 14 (47%) in females”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Occasionally, infections with D. repens in Austria were discussed to be autochthonous (one human case and seven in dogs).

    “However, occasionally infections with D. repens were discussed to be autochthonous (one human case and seven in dogs).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Reported travel activity or its absence reliably indicates whether a Dirofilaria infection was imported or acquired autochthonously.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    The three suspected human pulmonary dirofilariosis patients in Austria presented pulmonary symptoms and were positive for D. immitis at serology.

    “Patients presented pulmonary symptoms and were positive for D. immitis at serology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] Auer H. Die Dirofilariose des Menschen Epidemiologie and Nosologie einer gar nicht so seltenen Parasitose in Osterreich (Nematoda, Spirurida, Onchocercidae). Denisia; 2004; 463–471.

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Histology and PCR for the 2006 Nickelsdorf human case were positive for D. repens and negative for D. immitis.

    “Histology and PCR were positive for D. repens and gave a negative result for D. immitis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] H Auer, 2008, Der erst authochthone Fall einer subkutanen Dirofilariose in Österreich, Wien Klin Wochenschr source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Of the 26 D. repens monoinfections in dogs in Austria, 10 (38%) were female and 16 (62%) were male.

    “Ten (38%) dogs were female and 16 were male (62%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Cases of both D. repens and D. immitis in dogs in Austria have increased in recent years.

    “The increase of cases with both D. repens and D. immitis in dogs in recent years makes it clear that veterinarians should also consider these parasites in the diagnosis of Austrian dogs without prior travel activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    D. repens and D. immitis have been documented more frequently in recent years, and autochthonous findings in dogs as well as mosquitoes are reported in new areas where both filarioid species were not known as endemic before.

    “D. repens and D. immitis have been documented more frequently in recent years, and autochthonous findings in dogs as well as mosquitoes are reported in new areas where both filarioid species were not known as endemic before [3,7,11].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] F Simón, 2012, Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic, Clin Microbiol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] R Morchón, 2012, Heartworm Disease (<italic>Dirofilaria immitis</italic>) and Their Vectors in Europe—New Distribution Trends, Front Physiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] C Genchi, 2011, Dirofilarial infections in Europe, Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In central Europe, the first cases of D. immitis were described in four dogs in Switzerland in 1995.

    “the first cases of D. immitis were described in four dogs in Switzerland in 1995 [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] P Deplazes, 1995, Endoparasitenbefall bei Findel- und Verzicht-Hunden in der Südschweiz, Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aedes vexans, Ae. albopictus (no stable populations in Austria in 2014), Culiseta annulata, Culex pipiens complex, Anopheles maculipennis complex, An. algeriensis, and Ochlerotatus caspius are potential vectors for D. repens.

    “Of these, Aedes vexans, Ae. albopictus (no stable populations in Austria in 2014), Culiseta annulata, Culex pipiens complex, Anopheles maculipennis complex, An. algeriensis, and Ochlerotatus caspius are potential vectors for D. repens [3,12,17,21–23].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [3] F Simón, 2012, Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic, Clin Microbiol Rev source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] E Bocková, 2013, <italic>Dirofilaria repens</italic> microfilariae in <italic>Aedes vexans</italic> mosquitoes in Slovakia, Parasitol Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [17] C Zittra, 2015, Screening blood-fed mosquitoes for the diagnosis of filarioid helminths and avian malaria, Parasit Vectors source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] I Rudolf, 2014, Zoonotic <italic>Dirofilaria repens</italic> (Nematoda: Filarioidea) in <italic>Aedes vexans</italic> mosquitoes, Czech Republic, Parasitol Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] K Silbermayr, 2014, Autochthonous <italic>Dirofilaria repens</italic> in Austria, Parasit Vectors source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] N Becker, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Currently, 46 mosquito species are known to be present in Austria.

    “Currently, 46 mosquito species are known to be present in Austria [17].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] C Zittra, 2015, Screening blood-fed mosquitoes for the diagnosis of filarioid helminths and avian malaria, Parasit Vectors source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A stable establishment of D. repens in Austria is still to be seen, because all these cases were documented within a relatively short time span.

    “However, a stable establishment of D. repens is still to be seen, as all these cases were documented within a relatively short time span.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The circumstance that most Austrian dogs are kept indoors might delay the introduction and establishment of the nematodes and might be the reason why they are to date not autochthonous in Austria, while this is the case for neighboring countries.

    “This circumstance might delay the introduction and establishment of the nematodes and might be the reason why they are to date not autochthonous in Austria, while this is the case for neighboring countries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Most dogs in Austria are kept in the house, and outdoor and/or kennel keeping is uncommon in Austria.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    According to Simon et al. (2012), transmission of D. repens and D. immitis is limited to two main preconditions: the presence of one mosquito species capable of transmitting the parasites, and the presence of a minimum number of dogs infected with adult helminths that produce microfilariae.

    “According to Simon et al. (2012), the transmission of D. repens and D. immitis is limited to two main preconditions: (i) the presence of one mosquito species capable of transmitting the parasites, and (ii) the presence of a minimum number of dogs infected with adult helminths that produce microfilariae.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Simon et al. (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The potential autochthonous findings of D. repens in one human, seven dogs, and two mosquito species indicate that D. repens is becoming endemic and establishing itself in Austria.

    “The (potential) autochthonous findings of D. repens in one human, seven dogs, and two mosquito species indicate that this parasite is becoming endemic and establishing itself in Austria.”
    • Also stated in: § Key Learning Points · hedged
      “Autochthonous findings of D. repens in mosquitoes, as well as potential autochthonous cases in dogs and humans, suggest that this parasite is establishing itself in Austria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
14 of 14
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Until very recently, both D. repens and D. immitis were nonendemic in Austria.

    “Until very recently, both species were known to be nonendemic in Austria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Reported travel activity or its absence reliably indicates whether a Dirofilaria infection was imported or acquired autochthonously.

    “Twenty-seven patients reported travel activity to at least one country known to be endemic for D. repens prior to infection.”
    “All potentially autochthonous cases (with no reported time spent abroad) were reported from eastern Austria (Lower Austria and Burgenland) only (Fig 2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Detection of D. repens in mosquito vectors in Burgenland indicates local transmission and establishment of D. repens in eastern Austria.

    “The first findings of D. repens in mosquito vectors indicate that D. repens presumably invaded in eastern Austria.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Climate analyses from central Europe are applicable to Austria for assessing the capacity of D. immitis to establish.

    “Climate analyses from central Europe indicate that D. immitis also has the capacity to establish itself in the lowland regions of Austria, given that both canid and culicid hosts are present.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data from Germany on D. immitis establishment are applicable to Austria.

    “For D. immitis, this could not be confirmed yet, but data from Germany suggest that the successful establishment of this nematode species in Austria is a credible scenario for the near future.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cases reported in the literature and electronic patient databases are representative of all Dirofilaria cases in Austria.

    “Published as well as unpublished cases of imported and autochthonous documentations of D. repens and D. immitis in dogs (definite hosts), humans (accidental hosts), and mosquitoes (vectors) in Austria are summarized (Fig 1).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most dogs in Austria are kept in the house, and outdoor and/or kennel keeping is uncommon in Austria.

    “Most of these dogs are kept in the house; outdoor and/or kennel keeping is uncommon in this country.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in Austria reported eighteen parasitized dogs with D. immitis and three with co-infections with D. repens.

    “On the one hand, a study reported eighteen parasitized dogs with D. immitis and three with co-infections with D. repens [48].”
  • One main reason for the delayed introduction and establishment of D. immitis in Austria is the lack of microfilaraemic dogs as a consequence of less common kennelling or outdoor keeping of dogs in Austria.

    “One main reason for the delayed introduction and establishment of D. immitis is the lack of microfilaraemic dogs as a consequence of less common kennelling or outdoor keeping of dogs in Austria [6].”
  • Austria is facing pre-endemic status due to the worldwide spreading of D. immitis.

    “The spreading of D. immitis worldwide due to climate change, globalization and increased travel of infected dogs is the reason Austria is facing the pre-endemic status [5,6].”
  • The ongoing north- and eastward expansion of both Dirofilaria species has been mainly attributed to global warming, as well as environmental changes, which promote the expansion of mosquito vectors, along with the increased international mobility of infected vertebrates.

    “Such expansion has been mainly attributed to global warming, as well as environmental changes, which promote the expansion of mosquito vectors, along with the increased international mobility of infected vertebrates [27, 39–41]”
  • Autochthonous D. repens infections have been found in Austria in mosquitoes, dogs, and humans.

    “The first autochthonous findings of D. repens in mosquitoes in Austria were made in 2012, and seven cases of cutaneous dirofilariosis in dogs were thought to be autochthonous infections until 2014, while the first autochthonous D. repens infection in humans was found even earlier, in 2006 [9,10,11].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conclusion denies autochthonous nematodes despite confirmed mosquito findings

    Minor

    The conclusion says the nematodes are not autochthonous in Austria, whereas the mosquito section explicitly describes autochthonous Dirofilaria findings there.

1 of 1

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 100

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. H Bardach, 1981, Subkutane <italic>Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens</italic>-Infektion beim Menschen—Erste Fallbeschreibung in Österreich und Übersicht der Literatur, Wien Klin Wochenschr, 93, 123
  2. S Schuller-Petrovic, 1996, Subkutane Dirofilariose beim Menschen—Ein Fallbericht aus Österreich, H+G Zeitschrift fur Hautkrankheiten, 71, 927
  3. H Auer, 1997, Ein seltener Fall einer <italic>Dirofilaria repens</italic>-Infestation des Nebenhodens, Mitt Osterr Ges Tropenmed Parasitol, 19, 53
  4. M Kleiter, 2001, Kutane Dirofilariose (<italic>Dirofilaria repens</italic>) bei zwei nach Österreich importierten Hunden, Kleintierpraxis, 46, 283
  5. M Löwenstein, 1988, <italic>Dirofilaria immitis</italic> infection of dogs in Austria, Wien Tierarztl Monatsschr, 75, 420

Authors
Fuehrer, H.-P., Auer, H., Leschnik, M., Silbermayr, K., Duscher, G., & Joachim, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Fuehrer, Hans-Peter
Venue
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Published
2016-05-19
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
e0004547
ISSN
  • 1935-2727 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-2735
OpenAlex
W2406934330
Cited by
100
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Biodiversa+
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 2087/6-1, ANR-13-EBID-0007-01, I-1437)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-EBID-0007, I-1437, KL 2087/6-1)
  • Austrian Science Fund (KL 2087/6-1, I1437, FWF I-1437, ANR-13-EBID-0007-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria repens, Dirofilaria immitis, canine dirofilariasis, invasive species, autochthonous infection, mosquito vectors, climate change, Burgenland, Austria
MeSH terms
Animals, Austria, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Europe, Germany, Humans, Insect Vectors, Culicidae, Zoonoses, Endemic Diseases, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Climate Change, Dirofilaria repens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review