The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing
Open accessAbstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are highly subject-specific and vary considerably even between recording sessions of the same user within the same experimental paradigm. This challenges a stable operation of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems. The classical approach is to train users by neurofeedback to produce fixed stereotypical patterns of brain activity. In the machine learning approach, a widely adapted method for dealing with those variances is to record a so called calibration measurement on the beginning of each session in order to optimize spatial filters and classifiers specifically for each subject and each day. This adaptation of the system to the individual brain signature of each user relieves from the need of extensive user training. In this paper we suggest a new method that overcomes the requirement of these time-consuming calibration recordings for long-term BCI users. The method takes advantage of knowledge collected in previous sessions: By a novel technique, prototypical spatial filters are determined which have better generalization properties compared to single-session filters. In particular, they can be used in follow-up sessions without the need to recalibrate the system. This way the calibration periods can be dramatically shortened or even completely omitted for these 'experienced' BCI users. The feasibility of our novel approach is demonstrated with a series of online BCI experiments. Although performed without any calibration measurement at all, no loss of classification performance was observed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080 · cited 4×
“[11,12,13,14,10]) is a technique to analyze multi-channel data based on recordings from two classes (conditions).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA spelling device for the paralysed
Birbaumer, N., Ghanayim, N., Hinterberger, T., Iversen, I., Kotchoubey, B., Kübler, A., Perelmouter, J., Taub, E., & Flor, H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/18581 · Cited by 1,577
The Berlin brain-computer Interface: accurate performance from first-session in BCI-naive subjects
Blankertz, B., Losch, F., Krauledat, M., Dornhege, G., Curio, G., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2008.923152 · Cited by 338
Self-citationVidaurre, C., Schloogl, A., Cabeza, R., Scherer, R., & Pfurtscheller, G. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2006.873542 · Cited by 195
A Note on Brain Actuated Spelling with the Berlin Brain-Computer Interface
Blankertz, B., Krauledat, M., Dornhege, G., Williamson, J., Murray-Smith, R., & Müller, K.-R. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73281-5_83 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Cited by
Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial
Blankertz, B., Lemm, S., Treder, M., Haufe, S., & Müller, K.-R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.048 · Cited by 1,138
Self-citationHigh-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface
Chen, X., Wang, Y., Nakanishi, M., Gao, X., Jung, T.-P., & Gao, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508080112 · Cited by 969
Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance
Blankertz, B., Sannelli, C., Halder, S., Hammer, E. M., Kübler, A., Müller, K.-R., Curio, G., & Dickhaus, T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.022 · Cited by 674
Self-citationClassification of covariance matrices using a Riemannian-based kernel for BCI applications
Barachant, A., Bonnet, S., Congedo, M., & Jutten, C. (2013) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2012.12.039 · Cited by 493
Jayaram, V., Alamgir, M., Altun, Y., Scholkopf, B., & Grosse-Wentrup, M. (2016) · IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine · doi:10.1109/mci.2015.2501545 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Krauledat, M., Tangermann, M., Blankertz, B., & Müller, K.-R.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2008-08-13
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e2967
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018364998
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0002967
- The paper
- Krauledat, M., Tangermann, M., Blankertz, B., & Müller, K.-R. (2008). Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002967
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.