Cited by 105Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of a Novel Risk Locus for Multiple Sclerosis at 13q31.3 by a Pooled Genome-Wide Scan of 500,000 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

Open access
Comabella, Manuel, Craig, David W., Camiña-Tato, Montse, Morcillo, Carlos, Lopez, Cristina, Navarro, Arcadi, Rio, Jordi, BiomarkerMS Study Group, Montalban, Xavier, Martin, Roland·2008·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with an important genetic component and strongest association driven by the HLA genes. We performed a pooling-based genome-wide association study of 500,000 SNPs in order to find new loci associated with the disease. After applying several criteria, 320 SNPs were selected from the microarrays and individually genotyped in a first and independent Spanish Caucasian replication cohort. The 8 most significant SNPs validated in this cohort were also genotyped in a second US Caucasian replication cohort for confirmation. The most significant association was obtained for SNP rs3129934, which neighbors the HLA-DRB/DQA loci and validates our pooling-based strategy. The second strongest association signal was found for SNP rs1327328, which resides in an unannotated region of chromosome 13 but is in linkage disequilibrium with nearby functional elements that may play important roles in disease susceptibility. This region of chromosome 13 has not been previously identified in MS linkage genome screens and represents a novel risk locus for the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0003490

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Graphs showing physical position of SNP rs3129934 on chromosome 6. SNP rs3129934, which showed the strongest association with the disease in the Spanish and US replication cohorts, is located approximately 200 kb from the HLA-DRB1 locus.
Figure 1 Graphs showing physical position of SNP rs3129934 on chromosome 6. SNP rs3129934, which showed the strongest association with the disease in the Spanish and US replication cohorts, is located approximately 200 kb from the HLA-DRB1 locus.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Graph illustrating genes located in proximity to SNPs rs1327328 and rs7326018 on chromosome 13. SNP rs1327328 was the second most significant SNP validated in the Spanish and US replication cohorts, and is in strong linkage disequilibrium with SNP rs7326018. SNPs rs1330943, rs9588771, rs6492466, rs9583760, rs4284505, and rs9589207 have been typed by HapMap.
Figure 2 Graph illustrating genes located in proximity to SNPs rs1327328 and rs7326018 on chromosome 13. SNP rs1327328 was the second most significant SNP validated in the Spanish and US replication cohorts, and is in strong linkage disequilibrium with SNP rs7326018. SNPs rs1330943, rs9588771, rs6492466, rs9583760, rs4284505, and rs9589207 have been typed by HapMap.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
Comabella, M., Craig, D. W., Camiña-Tato, M., Morcillo, C., Lopez, C., Navarro, A., Rio, J., BiomarkerMS Study Group, Montalban, X., & Martin, R.
Affiliations
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Comabella, Manuel
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2008-10-22
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
e3490
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105655586
Cited by
105
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, genetic susceptibility, single nucleotide polymorphisms, linkage disequilibrium, replication cohort
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 13, Genotype, HLA-DQ Antigens, HLA-DR Antigens, Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review