The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG Responses to TMS Are Sensitive to Changes in the Perturbation Parameters and Repeatable over Time
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: High-density electroencephalography (hd-EEG) combined with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a direct and non-invasive measure of cortical excitability and connectivity in humans and may be employed to track over time pathological alterations, plastic changes and therapy-induced modifications in cortical circuits. However, the diagnostic/monitoring applications of this technique would be limited to the extent that TMS-evoked potentials are either stereotypical (non-sensitive) or random (non-repeatable) responses. Here, we used controlled changes in the stimulation parameters (site, intensity, and angle of stimulation) and repeated longitudinal measurements (same day and one week apart) to evaluate the sensitivity and repeatability of TMS/hd-EEG potentials. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 10 volunteers, we performed 92 single-subject comparisons to evaluate the similarities/differences between pairs of TMS-evoked potentials recorded in the same/different stimulation conditions. For each pairwise comparison, we used non-parametric statistics to calculate a Divergence Index (DI), i.e., the percentage of samples that differed significantly, considering all scalp locations and the entire post-stimulus period. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that it was possible to find an optimal DI threshold of 1.67%, yielding 96.7% overall accuracy of TMS/hd-EEG in detecting whether a change in the perturbation parameters occurred or not. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These results demonstrate that the EEG responses to TMS essentially reflect deterministic properties of the stimulated neuronal circuits as opposed to stereotypical responses or uncontrolled variability. To the extent that TMS-evoked potentials are sensitive to changes and repeatable over time, they may be employed to detect longitudinal changes in the state of cortical circuits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An information integration theory of consciousness
Tononi, G. (2004) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-5-42 · Cited by 1,958 · cited 2×
“Meanwhile, it would be interesting to test whether the DI resulting from two different perturbations decreases in physiological (sleep, anesthesia) and pathological (coma, epilepsy) conditions, where the capacity for integration and differentiation in thalamocortical circuits is thought to be altered [35,37,44,45].”
BackgroundBreakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep
Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Huber, R., Esser, S. K., Singh, H., & Tononi, G. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1117256 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationModalities, Modes, and Models in Functional Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174521 · Cited by 489
Modeling Sleep and Wakefulness in the Thalamocortical System
Hill, S., & Tononi, G. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00915.2004 · Cited by 417
Thut, G., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0115-4 · Cited by 388
A perturbational approach for evaluating the brain’s capacity for consciousness
Massimini, M., Boly, M., Casali, A., Rosanova, M., & Tononi, G. (2009) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17714-2 · Cited by 184
Self-citation
Cited by
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Stratification of unresponsive patients by an independently validated index of brain complexity
Casarotto, S., Comanducci, A., Rosanova, M., Sarasso, S., Fecchio, M., Napolitani, M., Pigorini, A., G. Casali, A., Trimarchi, P. D., Boly, M., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24779 · Cited by 487
“has been shown to produce robust and reproducible EEG responses.(24,25) If no large muscular or magnetic artifacts were visible on single-pulse responses, a few tens of trials were averaged”
BackgroundSelf-citationClinical utility and prospective of TMS–EEG
Tremblay, S., Rogasch, N. C., Premoli, I., Blumberger, D. M., Casarotto, S., Chen, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Farzan, F., Ferrarelli, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., et al. (2019) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.01.001 · Cited by 472
Self-citationRecovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients
Rosanova, M., Gosseries, O., Casarotto, S., Boly, M., Casali, A. G., Bruno, M.-A., Mariotti, M., Boveroux, P., Tononi, G., Laureys, S., et al. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr340 · Cited by 457
Self-citationPlasticity induced by non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation: a position paper
Huang, Y.-Z., Lu, M.-K., Antal, A., Classen, J., Nitsche, M., Ziemann, U., Ridding, M., Hamada, M., Ugawa, Y., Jaberzadeh, S., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.09.007 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Casarotto, S., Romero Lauro, L. J., Bellina, V., Casali, A. G., Rosanova, M., Pigorini, A., Defendi, S., Mariotti, M., & Massimini, M.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-04-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- e10281
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070723051
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG Responses to TMS Are Sensitive to Changes in the Perturbation Parameters and Repeatable over Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0010281
- The paper
- Casarotto, S., Romero Lauro, L. J., Bellina, V., Casali, A. G., Rosanova, M., Pigorini, A., Defendi, S., Mariotti, M., & Massimini, M. (2010). EEG Responses to TMS Are Sensitive to Changes in the Perturbation Parameters and Repeatable over Time. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.