The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistatic Relationships between sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The accessory gene regulator (agr) and staphylococcal accessory regulator (sarA) play opposing roles in Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. There is mounting evidence to suggest that these opposing roles are therapeutically relevant in that mutation of agr results in increased biofilm formation and decreased antibiotic susceptibility while mutation of sarA has the opposite effect. To the extent that induction of agr or inhibition of sarA could potentially be used to limit biofilm formation, this makes it important to understand the epistatic relationships between these two loci. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We generated isogenic sarA and agr mutants in clinical isolates of S. aureus and assessed the relative impact on biofilm formation. Mutation of agr resulted in an increased capacity to form a biofilm in the 8325-4 laboratory strain RN6390 but had little impact in clinical isolates S. aureus. In contrast, mutation of sarA resulted in a reduced capacity to form a biofilm in all clinical isolates irrespective of the functional status of agr. This suggests that the regulatory role of sarA in biofilm formation is independent of the interaction between sarA and agr and that sarA is epistatic to agr in this context. This was confirmed by demonstrating that restoration of sarA function restored the ability to form a biofilm even in the corresponding agr mutants. Mutation of sarA in clinical isolates also resulted in increased production of extracellular proteases and extracellular nucleases, both of which contributed to the biofilm-deficient phenotype of sarA mutants. However, studies comparing different strains with and without proteases inhibitors and/or mutation of the nuclease genes demonstrated that the agr-independent, sarA-mediated repression of extracellular proteases plays a primary role in this regard. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE: The results we report suggest that inhibitors of sarA-mediated regulation could be used to limit biofilm formation in S. aureus and that the efficacy of such inhibitors would not be limited by spontaneous mutation of agr in the human host.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, R., Braughton, K. R., Kretschmer, D., Bach, T.-H. L., Queck, S. Y., Li, M., Kennedy, A. D., Dorward, D. W., Klebanoff, S. J., Peschel, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1656 · Cited by 1,046
Evolution of virulence in epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Li, M., Diep, B. A., Villaruz, A. E., Braughton, K. R., Jiang, X., DeLeo, F. R., Chambers, H. F., Lu, Y., & Otto, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900743106 · Cited by 394 · cited 1×
“As a result, they produce extracellular toxins at high levels [34], and this contributes to their ability to cause invasive disease even in otherwise healthy individuals [35,36].”
BackgroundComparative Genomics of Staphylococcus aureus Musculoskeletal Isolates
Cassat, J. E., Dunman, P. M., McAleese, F., Murphy, E., Projan, S. J., & Smeltzer, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.187.2.576-592.2005 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Roy, R., Tiwari, M., Donelli, G., & Tiwari, V. (2018) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372 · Cited by 1,523
Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
Cheung, G. Y. C., Bae, J. S., & Otto, M. (2021) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688 · Cited by 1,380
Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: Properties, regulation, and roles in human disease
Archer, N. K., Mazaitis, M. J., Costerton, J. W., Leid, J. G., Powers, M. E., & Shirtliff, M. E. (2011) · Virulence · doi:10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 · Cited by 1,018
Peptide Signaling in the Staphylococci
Thoendel, M., Kavanaugh, J. S., Flack, C. E., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100370n · Cited by 438
Self-citationNew approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections
Kiedrowski, M. R., & Horswill, A. R. (2011) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06281.x · Cited by 288
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beenken, K. E., Mrak, L. N., Griffin, L. M., Zielinska, A. K., Shaw, L. N., Rice, K. C., Horswill, A. R., Bayles, K. W., & Smeltzer, M. S.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2010-05-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e10790
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096803605
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epistatic Relationships between sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0010790
- The paper
- Beenken, K. E., Mrak, L. N., Griffin, L. M., Zielinska, A. K., Shaw, L. N., Rice, K. C., Horswill, A. R., Bayles, K. W., & Smeltzer, M. S. (2010). Epistatic Relationships between sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010790
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.