Cited by 461Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows

Open access

Abstract

The spatial arrangement of urban hubs and centers and how individuals interact with these centers is a crucial problem with many applications ranging from urban planning to epidemiology. We utilize here in an unprecedented manner the large scale, real-time 'Oyster' card database of individual person movements in the London subway to reveal the structure and organization of the city. We show that patterns of intraurban movement are strongly heterogeneous in terms of volume, but not in terms of distance travelled, and that there is a polycentric structure composed of large flows organized around a limited number of activity centers. For smaller flows, the pattern of connections becomes richer and more complex and is not strictly hierarchical since it mixes different levels consisting of different orders of magnitude. This new understanding can shed light on the impact of new urban projects on the evolution of the polycentric configuration of a city and the dense structure of its centers and it provides an initial approach to modeling flows in an urban system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0015923

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

4 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–458 of 458

Metadata

Authors
Roth, C., Kang, S. M., Batty, M., & Barthélemy, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Barthélemy, Marc
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-01-07
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e15923
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015480405
Cited by
461
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
72.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
urban mobility, activity centers, flow heterogeneity, urban hubs
MeSH terms
City Planning, Humans, London, Population Dynamics, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review