CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 461Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structure of Urban Movements: Polycentric Activity and Entangled Hierarchical Flows

Open access
Roth, Camille, Kang, Soong Moon, Batty, Michael, Barthélemy, Marc·2011·PLoS ONE
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0015923PMC PMC3017563
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The spatial arrangement of urban hubs and centers and how individuals interact with these centers is a crucial problem with many applications ranging from urban planning to epidemiology. We utilize here in an unprecedented manner the large scale, real-time 'Oyster' card database of individual person movements in the London subway to reveal the structure and organization of the city. We show that patterns of intraurban movement are strongly heterogeneous in terms of volume, but not in terms of distance travelled, and that there is a polycentric structure composed of large flows organized around a limited number of activity centers. For smaller flows, the pattern of connections becomes richer and more complex and is not strictly hierarchical since it mixes different levels consisting of different orders of magnitude. This new understanding can shed light on the impact of new urban projects on the evolution of the polycentric configuration of a city and the dense structure of its centers and it provides an initial approach to modeling flows in an urban system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0015923

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Flow distribution. Loglog plot of the histogram of the number of trips between two stations of the tube system. The line is a power law fit with exponent .
Figure 1 Flow distribution. Loglog plot of the histogram of the number of trips between two stations of the tube system. The line is a power law fit with exponent .CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Ride distance distribution and propensity. (a) Superimposition of the distance distribution of rides (circles) and of the distance distribution between stations (squares). The distribution of the observed rides can be fitted by a negative binomial law of parameters and , corresponding to a mean kms and standard deviation kms (solid line). This distribution is not a broad law (such as a Levy flight for example), in contrast to previous findings using indirect measures of movement [12], [16]. (b) Ride distance propensity. Propensity of achieving a ride at a given distance with respect to a null-model of randomized rides.
Figure 2 Ride distance distribution and propensity. (a) Superimposition of the distance distribution of rides (circles) and of the distance distribution between stations (squares). The distribution of the observed rides can be fitted by a negative binomial law of parameters and , corresponding to a mean kms and standard deviation kms (solid line). This distribution is not a broad law (such as a Levy flight for example), in contrast to previous findings using indirect measures of movement [12], [16]. (b) Ride distance propensity. Propensity of achieving a ride at a given distance with respect to a null-model of randomized rides.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Total flow distributions. Zipf plot for the total inflows (red circles, below) and total outflows (blue squares, above) for morning peak hours (7am–10am). The inflow (outflow ) of a station () is defined as (). The straight lines are exponential fits of the form with for the inflow and for the outflow.
Figure 3 Total flow distributions. Zipf plot for the total inflows (red circles, below) and total outflows (blue squares, above) for morning peak hours (7am–10am). The inflow (outflow ) of a station () is defined as (). The straight lines are exponential fits of the form with for the inflow and for the outflow.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Hierarchical organization of the activity: Polycenters. Breakdown of centers in terms of underlying stations and inflows. We gather stations by descending order of total inflow and we aggregate the stations to centers when taking into account more and more stations. In this process, all stations within meters of an already-defined center are aggregated to this main center. This yields the dendrogram shown here which highlights the hierarchical nature of the polycentric organization of this urban system. The bold names to the left of the aggregates — such as “West End” for the group of stations around Oxford Circus — are used throughout the paper as convenient labels to denote the polycenters.
Figure 4 Hierarchical organization of the activity: Polycenters. Breakdown of centers in terms of underlying stations and inflows. We gather stations by descending order of total inflow and we aggregate the stations to centers when taking into account more and more stations. In this process, all stations within meters of an already-defined center are aggregated to this main center. This yields the dendrogram shown here which highlights the hierarchical nature of the polycentric organization of this urban system. The bold names to the left of the aggregates — such as “West End” for the group of stations around Oxford Circus — are used throughout the paper as convenient labels to denote the polycenters.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The London subway (tube) system: polycenters and basins of attraction. In the inset, we show the entire tube network while in the main figure, we zoom in on the central part of London. We represent the ten most important polycenters defined in the dendrogram of Figure 3, and show the corresponding propensity to anisotropy comparing actual flows with the null model defined in the text. A propensity of means that there is no deviation in a given direction with respect to the null model. Circles correspond to various levels of identical propensity values: the thicker circle in the middle corresponds to , inner circles correspond to propensities of and , and outer circles to and . The anisotropy is essentially in opposite directions from the center, thus showing a strong bias towards the suburbs for peripheral centers essentially, rather than for central centers. Moreover, most stations control their own regions and seem to have their own distinctive basins of attraction.
Figure 5 The London subway (tube) system: polycenters and basins of attraction. In the inset, we show the entire tube network while in the main figure, we zoom in on the central part of London. We represent the ten most important polycenters defined in the dendrogram of Figure 3, and show the corresponding propensity to anisotropy comparing actual flows with the null model defined in the text. A propensity of means that there is no deviation in a given direction with respect to the null model. Circles correspond to various levels of identical propensity values: the thicker circle in the middle corresponds to , inner circles correspond to propensities of and , and outer circles to and . The anisotropy is essentially in opposite directions from the center, thus showing a strong bias towards the suburbs for peripheral centers essentially, rather than for central centers. Moreover, most stations control their own regions and seem to have their own distinctive basins of attraction.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Structure of flows at and of the total flow. When considering the most important flows from stations to centers such their sum represents of the total flow in the network, we observe sources (represented as squares) with outdegree such as London Bridge, Stratford, or Waterloo connecting to three different centers (represented as circles), as well as sources with (eg. Victoria) and (eg. Elephant and Castle). We also show how the pattern of flows is constructed iteratively when we go to larger fraction of the total flow (from shown in black to shown in red). We represent in red the new sources, centers and connections. The new sources connect to the older centers (eg. West End, City, etc) and the existing sources (eg. Victoria) connect to new centers (eg. Northern stations, Museums, and Parliament).
Figure 6 Structure of flows at and of the total flow. When considering the most important flows from stations to centers such their sum represents of the total flow in the network, we observe sources (represented as squares) with outdegree such as London Bridge, Stratford, or Waterloo connecting to three different centers (represented as circles), as well as sources with (eg. Victoria) and (eg. Elephant and Castle). We also show how the pattern of flows is constructed iteratively when we go to larger fraction of the total flow (from shown in black to shown in red). We represent in red the new sources, centers and connections. The new sources connect to the older centers (eg. West End, City, etc) and the existing sources (eg. Victoria) connect to new centers (eg. Northern stations, Museums, and Parliament).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Most important links. Proportion of links going from sources to centers of a certain group (I, II, III), considering links of decreasing importance for each given source, when raising (from the first link appearing, at left, to the last link, at right).
Figure 7 Most important links. Proportion of links going from sources to centers of a certain group (I, II, III), considering links of decreasing importance for each given source, when raising (from the first link appearing, at left, to the last link, at right).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Transition matrix. Typical form of the outdegree transition matrix , consisting essentially of a row vector (, inexistent sources before the transition) and an upper triangular matrix (made of a diagonal of sources having the same out-degree after the transition, and a submatrix of sources whose out-degree increases after the transition).
Figure 8 Transition matrix. Typical form of the outdegree transition matrix , consisting essentially of a row vector (, inexistent sources before the transition) and an upper triangular matrix (made of a diagonal of sources having the same out-degree after the transition, and a submatrix of sources whose out-degree increases after the transition).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Evolution of the number of sources and their type. (a) Number of new sources () versus the total flow . (b) Fraction of existing sources whose type is changing () when the total flow varies from to . Here .
Figure 9 Evolution of the number of sources and their type. (a) Number of new sources () versus the total flow . (b) Fraction of existing sources whose type is changing () when the total flow varies from to . Here .CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Roth, C., Kang, S. M., Batty, M., & Barthélemy, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Barthélemy, Marc
ORCID
Venue
PLoS ONE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Published
2011-01-07
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
e15923
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0015923
PMC
PMC3017563
OpenAlex
W2015480405
Cited by
461
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 19
FWCI
72.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
urban mobility, activity centers, flow heterogeneity, urban hubs
MeSH terms
City Planning, Humans, London, Population Dynamics, Urban Population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review