The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multizone Paper Platform for 3D Cell Cultures
Open accessAbstract
In vitro 3D culture is an important model for tissues in vivo. Cells in different locations of 3D tissues are physiologically different, because they are exposed to different concentrations of oxygen, nutrients, and signaling molecules, and to other environmental factors (temperature, mechanical stress, etc). The majority of high-throughput assays based on 3D cultures, however, can only detect the average behavior of cells in the whole 3D construct. Isolation of cells from specific regions of 3D cultures is possible, but relies on low-throughput techniques such as tissue sectioning and micromanipulation. Based on a procedure reported previously ("cells-in-gels-in-paper" or CiGiP), this paper describes a simple method for culture of arrays of thin planar sections of tissues, either alone or stacked to create more complex 3D tissue structures. This procedure starts with sheets of paper patterned with hydrophobic regions that form 96 hydrophilic zones. Serial spotting of cells suspended in extracellular matrix (ECM) gel onto the patterned paper creates an array of 200 micron-thick slabs of ECM gel (supported mechanically by cellulose fibers) containing cells. Stacking the sheets with zones aligned on top of one another assembles 96 3D multilayer constructs. De-stacking the layers of the 3D culture, by peeling apart the sheets of paper, "sections" all 96 cultures at once. It is, thus, simple to isolate 200-micron-thick cell-containing slabs from each 3D culture in the 96-zone array. Because the 3D cultures are assembled from multiple layers, the number of cells plated initially in each layer determines the spatial distribution of cells in the stacked 3D cultures. This capability made it possible to compare the growth of 3D tumor models of different spatial composition, and to examine the migration of cells in these structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The origins and the future of microfluidics
Whitesides, G. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05058 · Cited by 9,687
Self-citationHydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Lutolf, M. P., & Hubbell, J. A. (2005) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1055 · Cited by 4,551
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Taking Cell-Matrix Adhesions to the Third Dimension
Cukierman, E., Pankov, R., Stevens, D. R., & Yamada, K. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1064829 · Cited by 3,027
Drug penetration in solid tumours
Minchinton, A. I., & Tannock, I. F. (2006) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1893 · Cited by 2,805
Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model.
Sutherland, R. M. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2451290 · Cited by 1,803
Spheroid-based drug screen: Considerations and practical approach
Friedrich, J., Seidel, C., Ebner, R., & Kunz-Schughart, L. A. (2009) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2008.226 · Cited by 1,742
The use of 3-d cultures for high-throughput screening: the multicellular spheroid model.
Kunz-Schughart, L. A., Freyer, J. P., Hofstaedter, F., & Ebner, R. (2004) · SLAS DISCOVERY · doi:10.1177/1087057104265040 · Cited by 797
In vitro and in vivo degradation of porous poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) foams
Lu, L., Peter, S. J., D. Lyman, M., Lai, H.-L., Leite, S. M., Tamada, J. A., Uyama, S., Vacanti, J. P., Langer, R., & Mikos, A. G. (2000) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00047-8 · Cited by 668
Cited by
From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips
Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,834
Self-citationEngineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia
Berthier, E., Young, E. W. K., & Beebe, D. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc20982a · Cited by 799
Engineered In Vitro Disease Models
Benam, K. H., Dauth, S., Hassell, B., Herland, A., Jain, A., Jang, K.-J., Karalis, K., Kim, H. J., MacQueen, L., Mahmoodian, R., et al. (2015) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040418 · Cited by 554
Self-citationCarbon Nanotube Reinforced Hybrid Microgels as Scaffold Materials for Cell Encapsulation
Shin, S. R., Bae, H., Cha, J. M., Mun, J. Y., Chen, Y.-C., Tekin, H., Shin, H., Zarabi, S., Dokmeci, M. R., Tang, S., et al. (2012) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn203711s · Cited by 464
Self-citationRodenhizer, D., Dean, T., D'Arcangelo, E., & McGuigan, A. P. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201701174 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Derda, R., Tang, S. K. Y., Laromaine, A., Mosadegh, B., Hong, E., Mwangi, M., Mammoto, A., Ingber, D. E., & Whitesides, G. M.
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-05-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e18940
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156272762
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 9.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multizone Paper Platform for 3D Cell Cultures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0018940
- The paper
- Derda, R., Tang, S. K. Y., Laromaine, A., Mosadegh, B., Hong, E., Mwangi, M., Mammoto, A., Ingber, D. E., & Whitesides, G. M. (2011). Multizone Paper Platform for 3D Cell Cultures. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018940
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.