The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Bile Acid Receptor GPBAR-1 (TGR5) Modulates Integrity of Intestinal Barrier and Immune Response to Experimental Colitis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: GP-BAR1, a member G protein coupled receptor superfamily, is a cell surface bile acid-activated receptor highly expressed in the ileum and colon. In monocytes, ligation of GP-BAR1 by secondary bile acids results in a cAMP-dependent attenuation of cytokine generation. AIMS: To investigate the role GP-BAR1 in regulating intestinal homeostasis and inflammation-driven immune dysfunction in rodent models of colitis. METHODS: Colitis was induced in wild type and GP-BAR1(-/-) mice by DSS and TNBS administration. Potential GP-BAR1 agonists were identified by in silico screening and computational docking studies. RESULTS: GP-BAR1(-/-) mice develop an abnormal morphology of colonic mucous cells and an altered molecular architecture of epithelial tight junctions with increased expression and abnormal subcellular distribution of zonulin 1 resulting in increased intestinal permeability and susceptibility to develop severe colitis in response to DSS at early stage of life. By in silico screening and docking studies we identified ciprofloxacin as a GP-BAR1 ligand. In monocytes, ciprofloxacin increases cAMP concentrations and attenuates TNFα release induced by TLR4 ligation in a GP-BAR1 dependent manner. Treating mice rendered colitic by TNBS with ciprofloxacin and oleanolic acid, a well characterized GP-BAR1 ligand, abrogates signs and symptoms of colitis. Colonic expression of GP-BAR1 mRNA increases in rodent models of colitis and tissues from Crohn's disease patients. Flow cytometry analysis demonstrates that ≈90% of CD14+ cells isolated from the lamina propria of TNBS-treated mice stained positively for GP-BAR1. CONCLUSIONS: GP-BAR1 regulates intestinal barrier structure. Its expression increases in rodent models of colitis and Crohn's disease. Ciprofloxacin is a GP-BAR1 ligand.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures


![Figure 3 Ciprofloxacin is a GP-BAR1 ligand. Panel A. Chemical structure of taurolithocholic acid (1) a natural GP-BAR1 ligand and ciprofloxacin (2). Panel B. The predicted GP-BAR1 three dimensional structure was used to analyze the interactions of taurolithocholic acid (lefts) and ciprofloxacin (right) with its binding domain. Both taurolithocholic acid (purple) and ciprofloxacin (yellow) accommodates on the GP-BAR1 binding site (lower panel). Panel C. Ciprofloxacin and TLCA increases [cAMP]i in GLUTag cells. N = 4; P<0.05. Panel D. Ciprofloxacin and taurolithocholic acid , 10 µM, caused a 2–3 fold increase in [cAMP]i in spleen-derived monocytes isolated from GP-BAR1 wild type mice (n = 4–5; P<0.05), but not in cells isolated from GP-BAR1−/− mice. Panel E. Ciprofloxacin, 10 µM, inhibits LPS-induced TNFα release in GP-BAR1+/+ monocytes but not in cells isolated from GP-BAR1−/− mice (n = 6; P<0.05 versus naive).](/paper-figures/645ac59c3ac349adb9dedb9289446954/the-bile-acid-receptor-gpbar-1-tgr5-modulates-integrity-of-intestinal-barrier-figure-3.jpg)


![Figure 6 Anti-inflammatory effects of oleanolic acid. Oleanolic acid (panel A), a natural GP-BAR1 agonist, exerts anti-inflammatory activity and protects against colitis development in wild type mice. Panel B. Oleanolic acid increases [cAMP]i in RAW cells in a concentration-dependent manner. N = 4; *P<0.05 versus basal. Panel C. Oleanolic acid reduces TNFα release from murine macrophages exposed to LPS. N = 4. *P<0.05; **P<0.05 versus LPS alone. Panel D–F. Oleanolic acid dose-dependently attenuates sign and symptoms of colitis induced by TNBS in wild type mice. N = 5 per group. *P<0.05 versus naive: ** P<0.05 versus TNBS alone. Panel G–I. Oleanolic acid treatment leads to a significant reduction in the colonic expression of inflammatory mediators including TNF-α and IL-6. *P<0.05 versus naive: ** P<0.05 versus TNBS alone.](/paper-figures/34660ea2467d400f94f732c92ee9c1cf/the-bile-acid-receptor-gpbar-1-tgr5-modulates-integrity-of-intestinal-barrier-figure-6.jpg)

Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“changes in the composition of the bile acid pool, an increase in colonic expression of GPBAR1 and a decrease in ileal activity of BAR have all been detected in patients suffering from IBD (Cipriani et al., 2011; Duboc et al., 2013; Lenz et al., 1976; Nijmeijer et al., 2011; Rutgeerts et al., 1979).”
From Understanding the Holobiont: How Microbial Metabolites Affect Human Health and Shape the Immune System (2017) · cites this paper as Cipriani et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Gpbar1−/− mice, like their Nr1h4−/− counterparts, develop more severe disease than wildtype controls in several animal models of inflammatory disorder, including colitis, hepatitis and gastritis (Cipriani et al., 2011; C. Guo et al., 2015; Y.-D. Wang et al., 2011).”
From Understanding the Holobiont: How Microbial Metabolites Affect Human Health and Shape the Immune System (2017) · cites this paper as Cipriani et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Mice treated with GP-BAR1 agonists (ciprofloxacin and oleanolic acid) abrogated the signs and symptoms of TNBS-induced colitis.117”
From Regulation of Intestinal Barrier Function by Microbial Metabolites (2021) · cites this paper as [117]
In the citing paper
“Importantly these mice were more susceptible to DSS- or TNBS-induced colitis.117”
From Regulation of Intestinal Barrier Function by Microbial Metabolites (2021) · cites this paper as [117]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility
Morris, G. M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M. F., Belew, R. K., Goodsell, D. S., & Olson, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21256 · Cited by 26,294
Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints
Šali, A., & Blundell, T. L. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · Cited by 12,977
MANTOVANI, A., SOZZANI, S., LOCATI, M., ALLAVENA, P., & SICA, A. (2002) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/s1471-4906(02)02302-5 · Cited by 5,528
Comparative Protein Structure Modeling of Genes and Genomes
Martí-Renom, M. A., Stuart, A. C., Fiser, A., Sánchez, R., Melo, F., & Šali, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.29.1.291 · Cited by 3,169
Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation
Watanabe, M., Houten, S. M., Mataki, C., Christoffolete, M. A., Kim, B. W., Sato, H., Messaddeq, N., Harney, J. W., Ezaki, O., Kodama, T., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04330 · Cited by 2,220
A G Protein-coupled Receptor Responsive to Bile Acids
Kawamata, Y., Fujii, R., Hosoya, M., Harada, M., Yoshida, H., Miwa, M., Fukusumi, S., Habata, Y., Itoh, T., Shintani, Y., et al. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m209706200 · Cited by 1,628
Main-chain Bond Lengths and Bond Angles in Protein Structures
Laskowski, R. A., Moss, D. S., & Thornton, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1351 · Cited by 1,217
Identification of membrane-type receptor for bile acids (M-BAR)
Maruyama, T., Miyamoto, Y., Nakamura, T., Tamai, Y., Okada, H., Sugiyama, E., Nakamura, T., Itadani, H., & Tanaka, K. (2002) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02550-0 · Cited by 993
Katsuma, S., Hirasawa, A., & Tsujimoto, G. (2005) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.139 · Cited by 789
The bile acid receptor FXR is a modulator of intestinal innate immunity
Vavassori, P., Mencarelli, A., Renga, B., Distrutti, E., & Fiorucci, S. (2009) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803978 · Cited by 655
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bile Acid Metabolism and Signaling
Chiang, J. Y. L. (2013) · Comprehensive physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c120023 · Cited by 1,662
Commensal bacteria at the interface of host metabolism and the immune system
Brestoff, J. R., & Artis, D. (2013) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2640 · Cited by 945
Connecting dysbiosis, bile-acid dysmetabolism and gut inflammation in inflammatory bowel diseases
Duboc, H., Rajca, S., Rainteau, D., Benarous, D., Maubert, M.-A., Quervain, E., Thomas, G., Barbu, V., Humbert, L., Despras, G., et al. (2013) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302578 · Cited by 930
Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy
Li, T., & Chiang, J. Y. L. (2014) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.113.008201 · Cited by 935
Postler, T. S., & Ghosh, S. (2017) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.008 · Cited by 876
“These protective effects notwithstanding, intestinal ATP has also been implicated in the development of IBD, likely due to the generally pro-inflammatory properties of ATP.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Cipriani, S., Mencarelli, A., Chini, M. G., Distrutti, E., Renga, B., Bifulco, G., Baldelli, F., Donini, A., & Fiorucci, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Perugia (IT)
- University of Salerno (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Fiorucci, Stefano
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS ONE
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2011-10-27
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e25637
- ISSN
- 1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3203117
- OpenAlex
- W1970465623
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2013-01-29)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi del Molise (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- TGR5, bile acid receptors, colitis, intestinal barrier integrity, tight junctions, intestinal permeability, ciprofloxacin, oleanolic acid, cAMP signaling, TNF-α, TLR4, monocytes, Crohn's disease, DSS-induced colitis, TNBS-induced colitis, lamina propria
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cholera Toxin, Ciprofloxacin, Colitis, Haptoglobins, Immunity, Intestinal Mucosa, Ligands, Permeability, Protein Precursors, Mice, Knockout, Tight Junctions, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review