Cited by 111Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reversal of Fragile X Phenotypes by Manipulation of AβPP/Aβ Levels in Fmr1KO Mice

Open access

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited intellectual disability and the leading known genetic cause of autism. Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), which is absent or expressed at substantially reduced levels in FXS, binds to and controls the postsynaptic translation of amyloid β-protein precursor (AβPP) mRNA. Cleavage of AβPP can produce β-amyloid (Aβ), a 39-43 amino acid peptide mis-expressed in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Down syndrome (DS). Aβ is over-expressed in the brain of Fmr1(KO) mice, suggesting a pathogenic role in FXS. To determine if genetic reduction of AβPP/Aβ rescues characteristic FXS phenotypes, we assessed audiogenic seizures (AGS), anxiety, the ratio of mature versus immature dendritic spines and metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)-mediated long-term depression (LTD) in Fmr1(KO) mice after removal of one App allele. All of these phenotypes were partially or completely reverted to normal. Plasma Aβ(1-42) was significantly reduced in full-mutation FXS males compared to age-matched controls while cortical and hippocampal levels were somewhat increased, suggesting that Aβ is sequestered in the brain. Evolving therapies directed at reducing Aβ in AD may be applicable to FXS and Aβ may serve as a plasma-based biomarker to facilitate disease diagnosis or assess therapeutic efficacy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0026549

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 92 references

1 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Hagerman RJ Hagerman PJ 2002 Physical and behavioral phenotype Baltimore John Hopkins University Press 3 109
  2. [69]Miller LJ McIntosh DN McGrath J Shyu V Lampe M 1999 Electrodermal responses to sensory stimuli in individuals with fragile X syndrome: A preliminary report. Am J Med Genet 83 4 268 279 10208160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–111 of 111

Metadata

Authors
Westmark, C. J., Westmark, P. R., O'Riordan, K. J., Ray, B. C., Hervey, C. M., Salamat, M. S., Abozeid, S. H., Stein, K. M., Stodola, L. A., Tranfaglia, M., Burger, C., Berry-Kravis, E. M., & Malter, J. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • Fraxa Research Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Westmark, Cara J.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-10-26
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
e26549
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966255973
Cited by
110
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • Waisman Center (P30 HD03352, HD03352)
  • National Institutes of Health (HD033.52)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA026067)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P30HD03352., P30HD003352)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMRP, amyloid precursor protein, amyloid-beta, Fmr1 knockout mice, audiogenic seizures, anxiety, dendritic spines, metabotropic glutamate receptors, long-term depression, plasma biomarkers, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Male, Neurons, Peptide Fragments, Phenotype, Genetic Therapy, Down-Regulation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate, Mice, Knockout, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review