Cited by 140Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 33 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Telephone helplines are frequently and repeatedly used by individuals with chronic mental health problems and web interventions may be an effective tool for reducing depression in this population. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of a 6 week, web-based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) intervention with and without proactive weekly telephone tracking in the reduction of depression in callers to a helpline service. METHOD: 155 callers to a national helpline service with moderate to high psychological distress were recruited and randomised to receive either Internet CBT plus weekly telephone follow-up; Internet CBT only; weekly telephone follow-up only; or treatment as usual. RESULTS: Depression was lower in participants in the web intervention conditions both with and without telephone tracking compared to the treatment as usual condition both at post intervention and at 6 month follow-up. Telephone tracking provided by a lay telephone counsellor did not confer any additional advantage in terms of symptom reduction or adherence. CONCLUSIONS: A web-based CBT program is effective both with and without telephone tracking for reducing depression in callers to a national helpline. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Controlled-Trials.comISRCTN93903959.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a national helpline RCT, a 6-week web CBT program (BluePages + MoodGYM) reduced depression more than treatment as usual at post-intervention and 6-month follow-up, with large effect sizes. Adding weekly telephone tracking by a lay counsellor did not improve symptom reduction or adherence, and tracking alone was not effective.

Key findings

  • Among 155 callers randomised, web CBT conditions showed greater decline in CES-D depression than control at post-intervention and 6 months. Effect sizes were large: web only vs control g = 0.76 post-intervention and 1.19 at 6 months; web with tracking vs control g = 1.04 post-intervention and 1.26 at 6 months.
  • Tracking alone did not differ significantly from control at post-intervention or 6 months, and telephone tracking did not confer additional benefit over web CBT alone for symptom reduction or adherence.
  • At 6-month follow-up, clinical caseness on the CES-D was 43.5% in web only, 50.0% in web with tracking, and 90.9% in control. NNT was 6.03 for web only and 4.43 for web with tracking.
  • Adherence did not differ significantly between web conditions: average MoodGYM modules completed were 1.5 (SD = 1.89) for web only and 2.0 (SD = 1.88) for web with tracking; 15.8% and 17.8%, respectively, completed all five modules.

Methods

  • Randomised controlled trial recruiting callers to Lifeline’s 24-hour telephone counselling service in four major Australian cities; eligibility included age ≥18, English, Internet access, and K10 score ≥22.
  • Participants were randomised to web only, web with tracking, tracking only, or treatment as usual; the web intervention combined BluePages psychoeducation in Week 1 with five MoodGYM CBT modules over Weeks 2–6, and tracking consisted of weekly 10-minute calls from a telephone counsellor.
  • Primary outcome was CES-D depression, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis using mixed models repeated measures ANOVA with planned contrasts; effect sizes used Hedges’ g, and logistic/linear regressions examined dropout and caseness.

Limitations

  • Stated: intervention completion rates were lower than in some other web-based depression trials; symptom severity remained high post-intervention; greater dropout in the web with tracking condition may have inflated effects in that condition; two outliers were excluded from primary analyses; and depression caseness was estimated by CES-D cutoff rather than diagnostic interview.
  • Stated: the trial was a true effectiveness trial using a volunteer workforce, which may contribute to recruitment and adherence issues relative to efficacy studies.
  • Evident from the text: the achieved sample of 155 was below the original target of 400, although the authors state it maintained above 80% power to detect differences of less than 0.5 SD units in planned comparisons between individual treatment arms.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0028099

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 49 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 29
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 22
48 of 48
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Missingness is either completely at random or at random conditional on observed data.

    “Mixed modelling allows the use of all available data for each participant to yield unbiased estimates of effects under the assumption that missingness is either completely at random (MCAR) or at random conditional on observed data (MAR) [30].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No studies have directly compared the relative efficacy of an Internet-based self-help treatment monitored by non-professionals with a non-guided treatment.

    “However, to-date, no studies have directly compared the relative efficacy of an Internet-based self-help treatment monitored by non-professionals (such as volunteer telephone counsellors) with a non-guided treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No trials have evaluated the effectiveness of web based interventions within existing helpline or call centre services.

    “To our knowledge, no trials have evaluated the effectiveness of web based interventions within existing helpline or call centre services.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mainstream mental health services are often difficult to access because of cost, structured consultation times, waiting list length, and location, and may not inspire trust.

    “However, mental health services are often difficult to access because of cost, structured consultation times, waiting list length, and location. In addition, mainstream mental health services may not inspire trust.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Volunteer counsellors constitute a ready made workforce to refer and/or guide callers, making it possible to use the existing call centre structure to deliver immediate, cost-effective, evidence-based help.

    “Volunteer counsellors constitute a ready made workforce to refer and/or guide callers, making it possible to use the existing call centre structure to deliver immediate, cost-effective, evidence-based help.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The CES-D cutoff used adequately identifies clinical caseness of depression.

    “depression caseness was estimated using a cutoff on the CES-D.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Helpline users prefer to treat themselves, manage their own health, and retain a greater sense of control over their treatment.

    “Helpline users in particular may prefer to treat themselves, to manage their own health, and to retain a greater sense of control over their treatment.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    High baseline depression symptom levels enabled greater change in symptoms from pre- to post-intervention.

    “the high baseline depression symptom levels observed in this sample may have enabled greater change in symptoms from pre to post-intervention.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(6, 100.5) = 2.97reported p = .01 · recomputed p = .010

    “F(6,100.5) = 2.97, p = .01”

  • Consistentt(109.2) = -3.34reported p = 0 · recomputed p = .001

    “t(109.2) = −3.34, p = .00”

  • Consistentt(109.5) = -2.23reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .028

    “t(109.5) = −2.23, p = .03”

  • Consistentt(109.2) = 1.38reported p = .17 · recomputed p = .170

    “t(109.2) = 1.38, p = .17”

  • Consistentt(105.8) = -2.16reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .033

    “t(105.8) = −2.16, p = .03”

  • Consistentt(105.7) = -0.89reported p = .37 · recomputed p = .375

    “t(105.7) = −0.89, p = .37”

  • Consistentt(105.4) = -1.35reported p = .18 · recomputed p = .180

    “t(105.4) = −1.35, p = .18”

  • Consistentt(100.5) = -2.97reported p = 0 · recomputed p = .004

    “t(100.5) = −2.97, p = .00”

  • Consistentt(100.7) = -1.43reported p = .16 · recomputed p = .156

    “t(100.7) = −1.43, p = .16”

  • Consistentt(100) = -0.01reported p = 1 · recomputed p = .992

    “t(100.0) = −0.01, p = 1.00”

  • Consistentt(100.3) = -3.16reported p = 0 · recomputed p = .002

    “t(100.3) = −3.16, p = .00”

  • Consistentt(100.4) = -1.54reported p = .13 · recomputed p = .127

    “t(100.4) = −1.54, p = .13”

  • Consistentt(100.7) = -1.74reported p = .09 · recomputed p = .085

    “t(100.7) = −1.74, p = .09”

  • Consistentt(112.6) = -2.09reported p = .039 · recomputed p = .039

    “t(112.6) = −2.09, p = .039”

  • Consistentt(109) = -1.98reported p = .051 · recomputed p = .050

    “t(109.0) = −1.98, p = .051”

  • Consistentt(107.7) = -1.72reported p = .089 · recomputed p = .088

    “t(107.7) = −1.72, p = .089”

  • Consistentt(107.7) = -2.83reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “t(107.7) = −2.83, p = .006”

  • Consistentt(81) = 0.388reported p = .7 · recomputed p = .699

    “t(81) = 0.388, p = .70”

  • Consistentt(81) = 0.728reported p = .47 · recomputed p = .469

    “t(81) = 0.728, p = .47”

19 of 19

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Tracking-only never-married percentage does not match the group size

    Minor

    Table 1 reports 7 never-married participants among 37 in the tracking-only group. That is 18.92%, which rounds to 19%, not 18%.

    Reported 18 · recomputed 18.918919

  • Same comparison has two different effect sizes in Table 4

    Minor

    Table 4 labels two rows "Web with tracking vs control," but reports different effect sizes for that comparison at both time points. The fourth row appears to describe a different comparison.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2003, National Review of Tele Counselling and Web Counsellling Services: Final Report
  2. AL Calear, 2009, The YouthMood Project: a cluster randomized controlled trial of an online cognitive behavioral program with adolescents., J Consult Clin Psychol, 77, 1021, 10.1037/a0017391 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–140 of 140

Metadata

Authors
Farrer, L., Christensen, H., Griffiths, K. M., & Mackinnon, A.
Affiliations
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Farrer, Louise
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-11-30
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
e28099
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038169816
Cited by
140
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council (LP0667970)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (525413, 525411)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, telephone helpline, telephone counseling, online intervention, psychological distress, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Patient Dropouts, Patient Participation, Telephone, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Confidence Intervals, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review